Dating method: Molecular clock.
This dating method is not as popular as it includes determining a timeline of history comparing regional differences in DNA. The origin theories of would claim at one time they had the same genome then genetically drifted over time seen so the method essentially “counts backwards”.
One experiment concluded Aboriginal Australians have were around for fifty thousand years (conducted by using aboriginal DNA to compare it to the DNA of the indigenous of New Ginae).
The rate of genetic change seems way to long probably because the dating method is used under the bias assumption that confide with the timeline scale of evolution origins (until it doesn't work such as this case). Turns out when calibrated to an experiment derived rate of change (or non origin evolution) of living organisms of the present the number makes sense. So when using a method that assumes evolutionary origins it disagrees with evolution despite the scale being calibrated by it.
As mentioned before when the scale is calibrated with scientifically tested rates of change or test evolution it aligns with a biblical timeline of about five thousand to ten thousand years. I am only putting the “ultimate origins of evolution” and “time” under a microscope. I obviously know we have the ability to adapt and evolve progressing by generation to generation.
I only dispute the origin theory of evolution not the rest that has been seen in laboratory (and every day settings). For natural and artificial selection has been know since there have been shepherds. A shepherd wants furrier sheep so they breed the furriest sheep. A cold winter could do the same trick by removing all the non furry sheep.
Source for the experiment (unable to archive).
Archive source for biblical timeline: https://archive.li/ChpPk
Archive source for image (and more like it): https://archive.fo/Z6nOy