Demisexual representation
I’m not sure if I’m doing this as a “tips to write good demisexual representation” post or “I haven’t found good demisexual representation and that's driving me crazy” post.
So I was really excited to read Radio Silence by Alice Oseman, but I did my best waiting and reading their other books in chronically order, before starting with Radio Silence, what I finally did five days ago. I was literally screaming when I started with it.
Why? Because I thought that I would finally find good demisexual representation. Key word: thought.
(Hold on the hate, let me get to the point, thanks)
I have read loads of books (on Wattpad) that promise demisexual characters. But half the time they didn’t use the label inside the book, or just on (in, at???? Please correct any grammar mistake) the epilogue. The others were one hundred percent as demiromantic as demisexual characters but they NEVER labelled the demiromantic part of the character’s experience.
So did Alice in Radio Silence. And I’m really disappointed.
Not because a character (as any people) cannot be demi in both types of attraction. Anyone can be both, anyone can experience sexual and romantic attraction in the same way.
But when talking about representation of an oppressed group, when our oppression is determined by how well allopeople can understand our experiences, it’s transcendental how well labelled are characters sold as ace/aro representation.
It's not that the demisexual part is bad written in Radio Silence, but it's not the only part written, just the only one mentioned.
So yes, if you want to write a character that is demisexual and demiromantic, that’s amazing, only if you name both labels.
So yes, Aled Last is both demisexual and demiromantic. And I know that he doesn’t care about labels, but he’s a character, not a person. He is a symbol for and of our communities. So both spectrums need to be named.
So yes, I’m tired of people who mix up sexual and romantic attraction. And still I rated Radio Silence with 5 stars ‘cause that’s my only critic, and I don’t know why these lines are constructed like this, but that’s the only part that bothers me completely about the book and how it's written.
Demisexual people do have crushes on any kind of people.
Commonly, it’s not that obvious that we don’t feel certain things, till you start noticing that you’re missing part of the experiences everyone else seems to have. But the romantic attraction (if you are just demisexual and not in the aromantic spectrum) is as everyone else’s and, since what I’ve talked with other demisexual people, commonly even more intense.
We just notice that how we have those crushes is different. Usually we don't understand how is different till we read about the split attraction model (SAM).
Fun fact (no that fun): Some demisexual people develop sexual attraction towards people for whom they don’t feel romantic attraction, too. And this part of our experience needs to be represented as well.