“I am bad” vs. “something bad happened to me” - Vegas and Pete (tw for child abuse & talking about trauma)
In a trauma informed approach to mental health people often talk about the difference between “I am bad” and “something bad happened to me”. When we experience trauma or Trauma, we often internalize the message “I am bad”. I think the easiest to understand example of this is with child abuse. Children who are abused often believe that their parents are hurting them because they are “bad” in some way. That’s the only way a child can understand being hurt by someone they (naturally and correctly) look to for care, protection and love. And children can carry that message with them into adulthood.
That’s what’s happening with Vegas. He literally says it to Pete. Vegas has no external framework for understanding his abuse. He believes he is bad because that’s what his father has told him. Obedience to his father – seeking his fathers approval – becomes rational if he, Vegas, is the source of the “problem”. That’s the trap Vegas is in and it’s an unsolvable catch-22 because he will never be able to “fix” himself and live up to his fathers expectations (as Pete points out, those expectations are a moving target and have nothing to do with Vegas himself). This also explains how blithe Vegas was about Porsche telling him he sucked. Vegas was like, “yeah, of course I suck”, because he literally believes it and not just in the context of his (very) bad behavior.
Pete has also experienced child abuse but he understands that he wasn’t “bad” or “wrong” as a child, instead “something bad happened” to him (although he may not always believe it, because belief and understanding are two different things).
The difference is crucial and probably also related to the difference between “I am bad” and “I did a bad thing” - for which Vegas clearly also has no real distinction.