It’s not a woman job to educate a man on how to be a decent human being.
- gender has nothing to do with humanity

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Congo - Kinshasa

seen from Italy

seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from China

seen from China

seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from India
It’s not a woman job to educate a man on how to be a decent human being.
- gender has nothing to do with humanity
The Freedom to Choose
Celebrating Independence
The morning sun shone over Golden Army Stadium as supporters arrived for another match.
Brock Gold #46 watched as one fan confidently made his way through the stadium using his mobility aid, stopping to greet volunteers before finding his own seat. Nearby, another supporter navigated independently with a white cane while others used accessible entrances designed for everyone.
No one rushed in to take over.
No one assumed they needed help.
The stadium had been built so every supporter could move through it with confidence and dignity.
Brock smiled as he looked around.
"Real inclusion isn't doing everything for someone," he said. "It's making sure everyone has the freedom to do it for themselves."
As the crowd rose for kickoff, every voice joined together.
Different journeys.
Equal opportunities.
One Golden Army.
The Golden Army believes everyone deserves the freedom to participate, contribute, and belong. True inclusion means creating opportunities for people to live, cheer, and succeed with independence and dignity.
Ready to join a brotherhood that values respect, teamwork, and equal opportunity? Contact our recruiters: @alton-gold77 or @polo-drone-125 and become part of the Golden Army today.
DEI isn’t just corporate speak - it’s a bridge to opportunity for communities fighting systemic barriers 🌉 When we open doors to education and resources, we’re not just changing lives, we’re transforming generations 📚 True inclusion means ensuring every voice has access to the tools for success ✨
🚀 Exciting News! 🌟 We're moving from Tumblr to Bluesky! 🚀
We’re excited to announce that we’ve decided to make the move from Tumblr to Bluesky! Here’s why we believe this is the best step forward for us and our community:
1️⃣ No Ads, No Interruptions: One of the biggest reasons we’re making the switch is that Tumblr has been increasingly promoting paid content, which often buries authentic posts and disrupts your experience. Bluesky, on the other hand, is completely ad-free, ensuring that every post is seen on its own merit—without any distractions or commercial influence. We can focus on what matters most: sharing amazing space discoveries and engaging with YOU, our community.
2️⃣ Equal Opportunity for Every Post: On Tumblr, posts that aren’t promoted or sponsored often struggle to gain visibility. This results in an uneven playing field where only paid content gets the attention. With Bluesky, every post gets equal opportunity to be seen. Whether it's a groundbreaking discovery or a fun stargazing fact, every piece of content is treated fairly and given a chance to shine.
3️⃣ A Stronger Community: Bluesky’s open, decentralized platform offers a more collaborative and community-driven experience. It’s built to empower creators and followers alike, fostering real conversations without the interference of algorithms prioritizing paid content. We’re excited to be part of a space where authentic engagement thrives and where we can connect directly with space enthusiasts like YOU!
4️⃣ Better Privacy and Control: Bluesky is committed to protecting user privacy and giving people more control over their online experience. With fewer ads and data-driven manipulations, we feel more comfortable knowing our content is shared in a more transparent environment.
5️⃣ Innovative Platform for Creators: Bluesky is all about experimentation and innovation, offering a fresh take on social media. It’s the perfect space for us to push boundaries, share captivating visuals, and build a community that appreciates the wonders of space exploration without the clutter of traditional social media platforms.
🌌 Join Us on Bluesky! 🌌
We’re excited to continue our journey of space discovery with you, but this time in a more direct and engaging way on Bluesky! If you haven’t yet, be sure to follow us at @webbdiscoveries to keep up with all the latest updates from the James Webb Space Telescope, stargazing tips, and fascinating insights into the universe!
We can’t wait to connect with you in this new, refreshing space. See you there! 🚀✨
Merit, privilege, equality: what if it’s not that simple?
Is meritocracy kind of… a lie?
It’s a question I’ve been hearing more and more, in articles, social media, podcasts, etc... Like, do people really succeed because they “worked hard”… or because they started way ahead? A comfortable background. The right people. The right codes. And suddenly, what we call “merit” feels a lot like disguised privilege.
Thing is, this isn’t a new idea. Back in the 60s, Bourdieu was already saying school doesn’t actually reward the most deserving, it just reproduces social inequality. Then in the 2000s, Piketty came in and showed how wealth mostly gets passed down. Not earned, inherited.
And now? People are pushing even harder. Some say meritocracy should just be abolished. That it's this comforting story we tell ourselves to believe the system is fair, when it’s been skewed from day one.
But honestly… is it really that black and white?
Of course, inequality exists. Some people start life with ten steps of advantage. Saying otherwise would be a joke.
But does that mean the whole system needs to be burned down? Does every form of success become suspicious unless it comes out of struggle? And what about effort? Skill? Discipline? Are we just throwing all that out?
Because here’s what we tend to forget:
Yes, some people are born with money, stability, and connections. But if they’re not capable, focused, or grounded… They don’t go far. And they don’t stay long.
Having access is one thing. Turning that into something real, something that lasts, that’s something else.
Right now, there’s this habit of reducing all success to background, like it erases the work, the stress, the responsibility. But running a team, building a business, leading anything: that’s not easy. It’s pressure. It’s risk. And it’s not for everyone even with “good contacts.”
Respect for everyone doesn’t mean absolute equality.
Yes, everyone deserves dignity. But no, that doesn’t mean we should all earn the same, be seen the same, or do the same.
Some roles are heavier. More technical. More exposed. And yeah, they should come with more, as long as it’s fair. No superiority complex. No abuse.
So maybe the real question isn’t: Should we cancel meritocracy? But: How do we open responsibility to people who are actually capable, even if they didn’t grow up with the right background?
So I’m asking:
Do we need to rethink this whole merit thing? Is background enough to explain success? Does “merit” still mean something today?
What’s your take? :)
- L.S.K.
(P.S. Translating this into English since apparently nuance doesn't hit unless it’s in meme format with a cartoon dog. Also just got back on Tumblr and it’s like my teenage bedroom got squatted by anarchist art students who start yelling “brainwashed” if you say not all rich people are demons. So here’s some context. Good luck.)
Reblog or like if you stan Equal Rights Activist Satan ™️
“In the face of the Black Lives Matter protests, some detractors are insisting that we celebrate the British government for abolishing slavery. Here's why that is ridiculous:
It was actually the Haitians that first abolished slavery, in 1804. Britain didn't get around to it until *three decades later*, and then only reluctantly, under sustained pressure from slave revolts and radical social movements (to whom the real credit belongs).
The Abolition Act of 1833 was not progressive but rather explicitly racist, declaring that enslaved persons were not humans but property, that therefore abolition amounted to expropriation, and that slave owners must therefore be compensated for their loss.
Not only did the British government pay an extraordinary sum to slave owners in a perverse act of reverse reparations, it required that slaves pay for their own freedom by working unpaid for a further 8 years after abolition ("apprenticeship", they called it).
Britain continued to openly countenance and profit from slavery in its colonies for more than a century after the Abolition Act, liberating slaves in Nigeria only in 1916, in Sierra Leone only in 1923, and in the West Indian colonies and the Cape colony only in 1938.
Britain engaged in state-sponsored trafficking of black people for more than 200 years. To claim credit for abolition is like a serial killer expecting praise for being made to stop murdering. Call not for praise but for remembrance and reparations.
And yet the British defense *against* reparations claims is to argue, ironically, that slavery was legal at the time. But you can't have it both ways. It is contradictory to invoke the legality of slavery and expect praise for ending it in the same breath.”-Jason Hickel