#fabians

[aeltri]

“Removing Your Face” is an MKUltra Dogwhistle 🎭

So, Caitlin Moran allegedly claimed that Ben could “remove his face at festivals.” Cute, right? Wrong. That wasn’t “quirky humour.” That was Fabian code. Anyone who’s read anything about trauma-based mind control knows exactly what “removing your face” means: Alters. Switching. Dissociation as performance. It’s not a metaphor, it’s a tell. Moran has been around establishment media long enough to know the language. She’s mocked Ben before and even made him cry in public, humiliation as entertainment. By dropping “remove his face,” she both signals insider knowledge and ridicules him in front of an audience who won’t get the reference. To the uninitiated: “Haha, Ben’s so skilled that he can disguise himself!” To those in the know: “We control him so completely that he can’t even keep his System together without our say-so.” That’s not storytelling. That’s weaponized disclosure and the fact that it’s said so casually is part of the ritual: make it public, disguise it as a joke, then dismiss anyone who notices as paranoid.

Funny how those “quirky” Dish anecdotes sound like reheated fragments of his actual life, scrambled into cover stories: Thriller dance? That was with Olivia Poulet years ago. Chewbacca impersonation? He did that on Graham Norton. Stuffy fursuit? 'Eric'. Face-removal at festivals? That’s a lazy metaphor for DID. It’s the same repetitive tactic: blend fragments of truth with PR lies until you can’t tell which is which. Let's not forget how Cunter’s own SIL got her dreck novel 'The End We Start From' fast-tracked into a film. Not because of “artistic merit.” It was a Fabian laundering op, a mediocre cultural project to funnel hush money and keep Ben’s silence intact. Another Fabian beneficiary, just like Moran. Funny how it’s always the same network: Moran, longtime Fabian mouthpiece and Camp Cunter, tied to Fabian Handlers. The publishing/film pipeline conveniently opening up for them and Fabians aren’t just some leftist intellectual club. They’re the cultural arm of the Frankist machine, desperately recycling trauma narratives because said machine is sputtering. Even Mandy’s not doing so great these days, his influence is waning, and his usefulness as a Fixer is dwindling. If that’s the fate of a Rothschild cousin, what does that say about the rest of their mid and low tier Assets? Soon it won’t be Ben crying in public, it’ll be them.

PS: The 🌹 in 'The Roses' is also a nod to the Fabians themselves and by extension, Labour.

[jessicaoutofthecloset]

Here’s what I was up to yesterday: giving a speech and taking part in a panel at the Labour Party Conference discussing how we can achieve Everyday Equality for disabled people. And yes, I’m talking alongside two MPs- how exciting is that! There was a very positive response to what I had to say and I’m still buzzing! If you want to know what was said there will be a full audio recording of the event available from the Fabian Society website and I’m going to do a write up of the event for the blog! . . . . . . . . #JessicaOutOfTheCloset #equality #disabilityrights #disabilitypride #disabled #invisibleillness #invisibledisability #chronicallyfabulous #chronicillness #fabians #fabiansociety #everydayequality #disabilityawareness #scope #scopecharity #lab17 #labourparty #labourpartyconference #mps #labourconference #policy #politics #spoonie #staystrong #ootdsocialclub #brighton @uklabour @scopecharity

[gettothedancing]

The tragedy of so many intellectuals in the contemporary world is that while opposing extreme forms of totalitarianism, they are themselves half-totalitarians; that is to say, they express a desire for a society which is half-controlled, half-regimented, half-planned, part capitalist and part socialist. This strange hybrid they will find (indeed, have found) to be a Frankenstein monster which, ironically, they have a great responsibility for creating. Thus, the Fabian [Britain’s “democratic socialists”] of yesteryear becomes inexorably the totalitarian of tomorrow, and ultimately the victim of his own creation. Horrified by some evils and excesses in a free society (which will always be imperfect) he turns hopefully to the blueprint of a controlled society which promises a heaven on earth in the very near future. But since the individual must always be imperfect this side of paradise, his society must always be imperfect, and the more absolutely it is controlled by single committees or groups of imperfect men with unlimited power, the more imperfect it is likely to be.

George S. Schuyler (1895-1977), black American journalist, circa 1960s

[gravalicious]

If [J.B.S.] Haldane’s opinions were sui generis, they would be of only minor interest. But far from expressing views that were unique Haldane’s linked beliefs in socialism, inequality, and eugenics were widely shared on the left, particularly amongst Marxists and Fabians with scientific interests. Beatrice and Sidney Webb, George Bernard Shaw, Havelock Ellis, Eden and Cedar Paul, H.J. Laski, Graham Wallas, Emma Goldman, H.G. Wells, Edward Aveling, Julian Huxley, Joseph Needham, C.P. Snow, H.G. Muller and Paul Kammerer-to note just some of the more prominent figures-all advocated (though in varying forms; some “positive” and some “negative,” some here and now and some only in the socialist future) the improvement of the genetic stock of the human race through selective breeding.[3] It was Shaw who argued that “there is now no reasonable excuse for refusing to face the fact that nothing but a eugenic religion can save our civilization,” Eden Paul that “unless the socialist is a eugenicist as well, the socialist state will speedily perish from racial degradation” and H.J. Laski that “the different rates of fertility in the sound and pathological stocks point to a future swamping of the better by the worse. As a nation, we are faced by race suicide.”[4] In the approximate half-century separating the work of Galton from the rise of fascism (which more than any other factor was responsible for the collapse of socialist enthusiasm for eugenics), such views were common.

Diane Paul - Eugenics and the Left [Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 45, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1984), pp. 567-590]

[fabians-popband-blog]

Music from 1986 20 years after stop playing just jooking around recorded on a music stereo....

[tanknoise]

[hengegirl]

Why has nobody seen through Andrew Harrop’s transparent and flimsy attempt to trash Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party? His ‘research’ (if you can call it that) is riddled with fa…