so i’ve been thinking about the real shitty fairly anti-women stuff that was said by el rey’s network president, and it really got me thinking about how it clearly applied to the parts i was fairly meh about on s3. and i’m not really blaming cotos for this, because i really feel like he had a gun to his head so to speak on this, but like
- kate being amaru instead of having her own arc? that smacks to me very strongly of them just being like eh, agency? fuck it?? it feels lazier and lazier the more i think about it
- richie as a whole getting shelved. especially since the network president went on about masculinity and all of that, and richie has never fit that archetype the way seth has? and that was a major plus for dusk as a show, especially in the first two seasons. and when they backslid into that sort of trope, they ended up pretty much ruining freddie’s character, ignoring richie, and giving seth way too much focus when richie is the one that’s always been prophesied about
- it’s very interesting to me how only now are people speaking out against el rey, because it’s become apparent they might not get what they want- the show has already been treating the geckos kind of strangely, but very few people seemed to mind when they were getting what that want- and that’s coming from me who loves sk and loved episodes 4 + 7 but am still capable of making critique, i know, shocking
- it’s like the disconnect between the super sexualized advertisements and the actual message of the show has finally become connected again, and let me just say, yikes
- and again, fandom loves to do that thing where if you give them a chance to ignore the mentally ill character, they will- this is hardly just a dusk problem, issac lahey sends his regards- but it’s nice to see who’s ableist deep down when it’s not trendy to support mentally ill characters (el rey as a network i guess?)















