I said what I said

seen from Türkiye

seen from Jordan
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Belarus
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China

seen from Morocco
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Uzbekistan

seen from France
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands

seen from Chile
seen from United States
I said what I said
3BP2 Episode 5: Ill Gotten Gains
Since itās a slow Sunday, weāre going for a two-fer!
I do 2 watches of favorite shows when they first come out. Ā The first, a single binge-watching session through all new episodes, so I can feel all the emotions Iām gonna feel. Ā The second is slower, to fully take in the new material and sort out my thoughts. Ā This time, with 3Below, Iāve decided to liveblog my second watch through.
Episode 1. Ā Episode 2. Ā Episode 3.Ā Episode 4.
Beneath the cut, thoughts on 3Below Part 2 Episode 5: Ill Gotten Gains.
Cataclysm : Ultimate X-Men 1
Cataclysm : Ultimate X-MenĀ 1
Writer Josh Fialkov
Penciler Alvaro Martinez
Penciler John Lucas
Colorist Jordie Bellaire
Letterer VCās Joe Sabino
Part One of Three
Ultimate Kitty Pryde is only referenced twice in Rogueās narration captions. Ā Which I find disappointing as I was hoping she was leading the charge. Ā Hopefully she shows up in this mini or the proper Cataclysm miniseries.
Kitty sends a rescue squad to what is leftā¦
View On WordPress
Hey gang, on may 7, go to your local comic-shop and get a free comic book!
My bro Geoffo and I did the layouts for this "Amazing Spider-man: Who am I ?" book, so, go get it!Ā
USA Today Names THE BUNKER the best digital comic of 2013.
Best digital series:Ā The Bunker. Joshua Hale Fialkov and Joe Infurnari's DIY digital comic garnered a print home with Oni Press and a TV deal, too. As it should, since its concept ā a bunch of kids are faced with what their future selves will unleash ā is one of the best seen in any entertainment medium this year.Ā Honorable mention:The Private Eye. Only Brian K. Vaughan doing a surprise comic could crash a website with people wanting to peep it. He and Marcos Martin let fans pay whatever they want to for installments of their sci-fi mystery about a society where people wear masks for privacy's sake, yet it's so good, one might consider it priceless.
And you can check it out in stores in a special enhanced print edition from onipress in February! Ā Order form here.Ā
Source:Ā http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/2013/12/31/best-comic-books-of-2013/4259801/
Come on DC, this is wrong on so many levels. First, killing off one of your, if not THE most prominent black characters? Second, you made a promise to creators not that long ago to not fuck with stories once approved... so then you turn around and have Fialkov kill off one of the two stars of his book after his pitched story had already been greenlit? And Diggle ALSO walked off of Action due to meddling? And both of them before their first issues even hit the stands? This HAS to be a sign that you're doing something seriously wrong in regards to how you treat creative. If writers keep walking due to meddling, especially after that promise you made to them, you're soon not going to have anyone left.
I mean. I understand that from a storytelling point, sometimes a character death is called for. I get that. But if Fialkov didn't think a character death was called for, why did editorial? What possible purpose could this death serve which would justify it? And why Stewart rather than Gardner? I'm not saying race should grant immunity to this sort of thing, but when you have so few black characters to start with, I think the death of one of them should be approached with extra care, especially if they are as prominent as John Stewart. It should be impactful and have a good, well thought out storytelling reason behind it.
And not only that, he is the Green Lantern in much of the animated fare, and is more recognizable to many people than even Hal, so this move becomes extra baffling, since you are killing off a potential gateway character that could be a bridge for people to move from TV to the comics.
I understand that as a company DC (or Marvel etc) has the right to determine the direction of the characters they own, and have the right to veto what writers would like to doĀ with them. I get that, and don't have a problem with this in general. But there is a right way and a wrong way to go about it, and I think DC has consistently been going about it in the wrong way. Last minute changes to already approved stories, which just results in a directionless floundering mess of a book, is definitely at the top of the list of things not to do.Ā Marvel has been doing much better in treating it's talent well, recently, and people are going to move to greener pastures. I have been greatly enjoying much of the Marvel Now stuff, in a large part because the books feel more cohesive, like they have a solid direction to them, and the writer isn't being constantly shot down by editorial. I am not sure exactly how true this is in practice, but as someone who has been a comic reader for some time now, I've come to recognize certain telltale signs of excessively heavy handed editorial, and I'm not seeing it at Marvel right now, (outside of events) and the books are better for it. To Fialkov, Diggle, and any other creator who has walked over excessive meddling, good for you for sticking to your creative guns. If more writers would do that, DC will (one would hope) be forced to treat all of creative a bit better.
I, Vampire is a bloody brilliant read
First off, I should start by pointing out that I wasn't going for a pun with that title. I was just trying to emphasise my point in a very British way, but it works.
Anyway, here goes my first attempt at reviewing a comic. When DC announced last year that they were rebooting their catalogue with 52 new titles, I wasn't sure how to react. I'd only been reading comics properly for a few months and was enjoying the stories at the time. But when the first wave came out I was looking forward to sorting the wheat from the chaff.
One of my favourites so far has been I, Vampire. I've always enjoyed vampires, but in the classic sense. Not the glittery, teen girl fantasy fuel of Twilight (I actually felt the bile rising up my throat in anger as I wrote that word!), but the dark, mysterious and evil vampires of Bram Stoker. I, Vampire has been refreshing in that it doesn't romanticise vampires. It's clear that you are meant to dislike Mary, and you do. Joshua Hale Fialkov is weaving a great story with this book and it's one of the very few titles I'm actually looking forward to reading each month.
The art is a brilliant compliment to the story. I'm not going to be able to explain this well, but I'll give it a go. I really like the way that Andrea Sorrentino draws faces and bodies and the use of shadow and darkness is a fantastic compliment to the theme. And there seems to a be mistiness or fogginess throughout that adds a great effect. And the splash pages are developing, I'm going to post an image of one from issue 5 which I think is amazing.
That wasn't a very good review to be fair, mainly because I find it quite hard to put in to words my opinions on artwork, no matter how much I enjoy it. But if there are any comic fans reading this and you haven't read I, Vampire yet, I highly recommend picking it up.