Discover Top Posts Tagged with #forked personality

A Reaction to Jordan Peterson's "12 Rules for Life Tour - Melbourne, Australia." YouTube Video

Jordan Peterson seems a bit monomaniacal in regards to this hierarchy/nature over nurture vibe to his argumentation. I Sydney Barbour slightly oppose this "vibe". I prefer a non-positional mindset [An insouciant attitude towards the rat race, especially when someone has gratitude for things regardless of how they may benefit from them in regard to the pecking order.]. Jordan Peterson wants to maximize the minimum prospects with a meritocratic system. Ya know dudes like in that Aristotelian fashion where you give the virtuous folk the flutes to get maximal benefits for society -- bruh. I suppose my position comes out of like constructivism, social constructivism, nurture over nature/nurture over the hereditarian arguments, and radical fluid identity theory [which posits that many of the putative unchangeable characteristics, such as race or gender,will become irrefutably protean in the future given we reach the point where it's technologically possible to do things like switch genders or race more easily & or in a (more) irrefutable manner. Supposed unchangeable characteristics would become patently changeable & analogous to the clothes one chooses to wear or the colour of hair one chooses to have.]. So in conclusion, I’m like digging some of this stuff, but not all of it.

I do like his grow the pie vibes & his opposition to cherry-picking the 1% that would conveniently leave out the middle class of highly developed countries as opposed to the significantly less well-to-do countries.I dig him calling out some hypocrisy of them phony statisticians -- dude.

Written By Sydney Barbour (a forked personality of Murdoch’s with a Voluntaryist perspective/bias)

#Sydney Barbour #forked personality #politics moribund #politics moribund institute #political moribund #political #jordan peterson #jordan peterson reaction #meritocratic system #non-positional mindset #voluntaryist #protean #radical fluid identity theory #social constructivism #hereditarian arguments #nurture v. nature #Aristotelian

Do Libertarians eschew most partisan traps?

Is the US Libertarian party the only political party with staunch supporters who are aptly ready to call out the party when it does something dumb? Republicans & Democrats seldom seem to be able to call out their party. As of late, I've seen the Democrats who have this Micheal Sandal guy willing to say that the Democrats haven't put up a decent candidate to oppose Trump in 2020, but a lot of Democrats say that and sort of religiously endorse Biden anywho. Aside - ROFL the presidential race is between these two old, out of touch, Keynesians. Aside 2 - To be honest the Democrats had some ludicrous presidential nominees this year too like some new-age mystic lady [See: DnD]. Continuation - Yet, for this 2020 election, the Democrats had a promising rising star (a sort of Keynesian superhero) Andrew Yang who seemed willing to call out the democratic party for their bosh – for while at least. Sadly methinks he's given way to pragmatism; because of the putative Trump threat. Along with every other Democratic nominee, Andrew Yang endorsed Biden #Disapointing. Which in my mind twas somewhat sketch that all the Democratic nominees were willing to endorse someone like Biden. Someone with a lousy track record on immigration (very harsh), drugs (war on drugs leader), and worst of all a Keynesian. In regards to the Republicans and their people who would be willing to call out their party for its humbug. Would prolly be this Justin Amash guy who calls out the poor incentive structure within the US government all the time [See: Justin Amash on "Yang Speaks" juxtapositing how laws get passed in the statehouse versus how laws get passed in congress]. Plus, these Republicans have this Rand Paul guy who calls out the dumb nature of making it super impossible for most of the congress-people to have time to read the bills & whatnot. With the result of such having it so only the party leaders supposedly know what's in the bills. These main congress folk ends up whipping the rest of their partisan side into voting whichever way their part leaders, please. Finally, upon reflection, this Libertarian party is seemingly chockful of these highly individualized people – who (to be honest) are a bit too oppositional to everything. There was one VP candidate who stripped on stage apparently – I'd say that's very oppositional to societies tacit norms. I say the US's Libertarian party may have a superfluity of these disputatious folk. Yet the confounding variable to this situation may be the fact that tis a small 3rd party which draws the highly ideologically motivated or attention-seeking wacky-folk to run as candidates. Also, to that, I hear the Libertarian presidential race is pretty open and easy to join in comparison to the other parties – so that may give way to less established to join the race. In regards, to calling out political parties for doing dumb stuff. Methinks the Libertarian party shouldn't have picked Spike Cohen as it's 2020 VP pick –albeit I do understand that a podcaster may be good for marketing. I'd prefer to put up a qualified front for a presidential race. With Jo Jorgensen as the presidential pick (something which I approved of wholeheartedly) and Judge Jim Gray as the VP pick. – Murdoch Harris's 2020 Self Who is Leaning Libertarian & Interested In Ricardian Socialism & Anarchic Marxism Whatever Those Are Iteration

Written By Sydney Barbour (a forked personality of Murdoch’s with a Voluntaryist perspective/bias)

Socialism tis a Governmental System of the Future not the Present

Isn't the iterations of socialism that are coming out these days – making Socialism look bad? These days socialism is associated with icky centralization, bureaucracy, and bad regulations that are inbringing a need for more regulations that inbring a need for more regulations. We're stuck with electorial market-socialist poo-poo that vitiates our markets. A socialistic system that really shouldn't be tied to any sort of nation-state. Socialism is a governmental system of the future, not the present. Socialism is a governmental system for a land of decentralization, smart contracts supplanting lawyers, and scarcity being a thing of the past. Socialism doesn't seem to help any modern nation-state system. If only the Socialists had some sort of anarchic agorist type movement; instead of, this revisionist Marxist & reformist whatnot. Then these Socialists could more easily experiment with various iterations of their "ideology in process" instead of releasing substandard defective products i.e. poo-poo policies that inbrings higher costs of living which in turn makes a minimum wage seem necessary( a policy that only makes the problem worse). These versions of Socialism coming out as of late are substandard systems that inbring inflation year after year making fat-cats richer whilst removing rungs from the ladder of social mobility. Foisting a situation where everyone has to become a stock speculator, find alternative currencies, or find any other sort of method to eschew their national currencies. These poo-poo situations give the Socialists such a poor track record with their association with poo-poo Keynesianism which is such a half in the bag system. Methinks we should treat these socialists like governnauts [explorers of new forms of governance], and underwrite their exploration via crowdsourcing (voluntarily – unlike their present nonvoluntary icky Democratic Socialism feigning consent via substandard/not fully fleshed out democracy). Socialism please move to some seastead or something and find a way to make your ideology more voluntary and give people the right to secede from such voluntary ideology. Whilst these Socialists explore, and if we have to continue these nation-state systems – methinks the Austrian economists should be in charge. These Austrian economists are pretty baller with precluding the icky stuff associated with crony capitalism i.e. revisionist Marxism/market socialism/mercantilism/protectionism. Let's make these Austrian economists more popular. Then we should move into treating our governments like companies competing for customers & our companies should act as though they're all public interest companies with more explicit eleemosynary goals. Governments should be voluntary subscription model systems with people being incentivized to donate to others' welfare to eschew involuntary Socialism.

Written By: Levi Mulder (a forked personality of Murdoch’s with a Republican political bias)

Murdoch will write under load of political characters. He has a dramatis personae of political writers including Elliot Mccreary [anarcho-syndicalist], Sydney Barbour [Voluntaryist], Jody Hewitt [socialist/democrat/market socialist/democratic socialist], Carson Malley [Environmentalist], etcetera.