The Magnus Protocol Episode 53.
No glitches heard.

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Italy
seen from Sweden

seen from United States

seen from Sweden

seen from Denmark

seen from United States
The Magnus Protocol Episode 53.
No glitches heard.
Crossed Wires is now live on OSF — an open-access white paper exploring the overlooked impact of hemispheric lateralisation in cochlear implantation for APD and early-onset deafness. 📄 https://osf.io/pwqr7/
Abstract Cochlear implantation is often approached as a peripheral correction of hearing loss, with ear selection guided primarily by audiological severity, device history, or anatomical constraints. Yet for individuals with prelingual deafness and auditory processing disorder (APD)—particularly those who developed language through visual-dominant modalities such as lipreading and captioning—this approach may overlook a crucial factor: brain lateralisation.
The auditory system is inherently asymmetrical, with each ear routing input to the opposite cerebral hemisphere. Given that the left hemisphere is typically dominant for language decoding, implanting the left ear (feeding into the right hemisphere) may, in some cases, introduce an artificial signal into a neural system ill-suited to interpret it.
This paper proposes that ear choice in cochlear implantation should consider cerebral dominance and sensory compensation history, particularly in older CI recipients with entrenched APD and visual adaptation. Drawing on findings from research on hemispheric language dominance, cortical reorganisation, unilateral vs bilateral stimulation, and cross-modal plasticity, it identifies a critical gap: current CI evaluation protocols rarely account for how early sensory deprivation and neural re-routing shape long-term comprehension.
Evidence suggests CI outcomes can vary based on implantation side (Chilosi et al., 2014) and that unilateral implants may lead to asymmetric cortical dominance with lasting consequences (Gordon et al., 2013).
This paper doesn’t prescribe a universal protocol, but calls for a more personalised, neurocognitive framework—one that recognises that more input does not always mean more understanding, especially when the signal enters the wrong side of a rewired brain.
look I'm just saying
steven really be out here glitchin this episode 👀
Dude. What if Five was the glitch. His dad was a programmer/hacker. What if he hacked Hinobi technology and purposely made a glitch like Ridley. We never hear about Five’s mom or that side of the family. What if he got the nickname “Five” as he was the fifth attempt at making a successful AI.
I dunno. I’m kinda tired.
Never finished Inktober, but here are some prompts that I did in advance because I knew I’d be busy when I was meant to do them
1) Past
This one made me think of the time travel ep, so I drew young Donald and Della!
2) Legend
I considered doing Scrooge for this prompt, but in the end I settled for this random girl on a cliff
3) Isolation
This prompt made me think about alleycats, I’m not sure why? But I went with it and it took forever to colour
4) Spirit
Need I explain? Tis Duckworth!
5) Glitch
Ok, so this prompt actually made me think of a wholeass theory so strap in bois-
So Frank said that maybe “Agent 22” came before “Bentina Beakley”, and that made me think, what if Beakley’s a robot?
Maybe she was the 22nd attempt at creating the perfect simulation of human life, and was made to be the perfect agent, able to easily blend in, but also kick your ass.
It would explain why the crowd shout “22! 22!” at the party in the time travel ep, because in reality “Bentina Beakley” is her code name.
And maybe she stopped working for SHUSH because they discovered a glitch, and planned to shut her down and begin work on attempt 23
think about the glitch theory and
the way Felix is so self aware in D9 and the I am NOT trailer??
we know he's the glitch, but is he the same kid of glitch as the others?
I think Felix is a controlled glitch
as in he was made by the government. during his part in the I am NOT trailer it says "fake", could that mean that Felix is a fake glitch?
You can’t talk about a glitch canon without discussing Glitch Feminism and Legacy Russell. Here is Legacy giving a talk about it at LSE and here is a link to her text for Rhizome.
Glitches Get Stitches: An Interview with Artist Phillip Stearns
Writer Nick Zurko interviewed Phillip David Stearns, the artist and designer behind GlitchTextiles. From music to art, glitch to stitches and everything in between. This interview is the most comprehensive glimpse yet at the story behind the creation of GlitchTextiles. READ MORE