#guilbeault

[vincentreproches]

invention de l’affiche en recto/verso

invention du programme/slogan en icônes (mais qui peut dire ce qu’il promet?)

[immunobiz]

🚨 Canadiens, ouvrez les yeux! La loi C-11, c’est bien plus qu’une simple réglementation. C’est un outil de censure 📵, un bâillon numérique 🧨. Ils veulent choisir ce que vous pouvez voir, entendre et penser 🎯. Et maintenant, Carney et Guilbeault passent à l’action 🧠⚠️.

🎬 Liberté numérique en péril. Ce n’est pas un complot… c’est la réalité. 😡📛💥🧠💻👀🗣️🚨🧨🇨🇦

🚨 Canadians, wake up! Bill C-11 is more than just regulation — it’s digital censorship in disguise 📵. They want to control what you see, hear, and think 🧠💥. Now Carney and Guilbeault are pushing it full force ⚠️.

🎬 Your freedom online is under attack. This isn’t a theory — it’s happening. 😡📛💥🧠💻👀🗣️🚨🧨🇨🇦

[mgeist]

Federal Court Approves Consent Order Requiring Minister Steven Guilbeault to Unblock Ezra Levant on Twitter

The Federal Court has approved a consent order requiring Environment and Climate Change Minister Steven Guilbeault to unblock Rebel News publisher Ezra Levant on Twitter. The order stems from a 2021 lawsuit filed by Levant which argued that blocking “violated the Applicants’ constitutional rights under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in blocking access to official…

View On WordPress

[mgeist]

The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 126: Why Canada's Online Harms Consultation Was a Transparency and Policy Failure

The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 126: Why Canada’s Online Harms Consultation Was a Transparency and Policy Failure

This week’s Law Bytes podcast departs from the typical approach as this past week was anything but typical. As readers of this blog will know, last week I obtained access to hundreds of previously secret submissions to the government’s online harms consultation. Those submissions cast the process in a new light. This week’s Law Bytes podcast explains why the online harms consultation was a…

View On WordPress

[mgeist]

Not an Outlier: What the Government's Online Harms Secrecy Debacle Says About Its Internet Regulation Plans

Not an Outlier: What the Government’s Online Harms Secrecy Debacle Says About Its Internet Regulation Plans

My post on the hundreds of submissions to the government’s online harms consultation has garnered significant attention, including a front page news story from the Globe and Mail (I was also pleased to appear on Evan Solomon’s show and the Dean Blundell podcast). The coverage has rightly focused on previously secret submissions such as those from Twitter likening the Canadian plan to China or…

View On WordPress

[mgeist]

The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 104: Taylor Owen on What the Latest Facebook Revelations Mean for Canada's Online Harms Legislative Plans

The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 104: Taylor Owen on What the Latest Facebook Revelations Mean for Canada’s Online Harms Legislative Plans

Facebook has once again found itself in the political spotlight as Frances Haugen, a former data scientist and product manager with the company turned whistleblower, provided the source documents for an explosive investigative series in the Wall Street Journal followed by an appearance before a U.S. Senate committee. The Facebook Files series comes just as Canada is moving toward its own…

View On WordPress

[mgeist]

Tracking the Submissions: What the Government Heard in its Online Harms Consultation (Since It Refuses to Post Them)

Tracking the Submissions: What the Government Heard in its Online Harms Consultation (Since It Refuses to Post Them)

The Canadian government’s consultation on online harms concluded earlier this week with a wide range of organizations and experts responding with harshly critical submissions that warn of the harm to freedom of expression, the undermining of Canada’s position in the world as a leader in human rights, and the risk that the proposed measures could hurt the very groups it is purportedly intended to…

View On WordPress

[mgeist]

Failure to Balance Freedom of Expression and Protection from Online Harms: My Submission to the Government's Consultation on Addressing Harmful Content Online

Failure to Balance Freedom of Expression and Protection from Online Harms: My Submission to the Government’s Consultation on Addressing Harmful Content Online

The government’s consultation on its proposed approach to address harmful content online concluded over the weekend. The consultation was one of several consults that ran during the election period and which raise questions about whether policy makers are genuinely interested in incorporating feedback from Canadians. I submitted to all the various consultations and will be posting those…

View On WordPress