#hazard perception

[turquoisewaves07]

ugh practicing for hazard perception test is so stressful because a lot of the time the test will either be like "you didn't telepathically realise those people were going to cross the road before they started walking towards the pedestrian crossing" FEWER MARKS FOR YOU!!! you didn't realise the tractor in the field was going to leave the field until it started leaving the field!!!! and then sometimes it'll be like "you noticed that learner driver before they literally pulled out in front of you? sorry much too fast for us you didn't notice them at all" or like "you saw those pedestrians before crashing into them? you actually didn't see them at all" FAIL and there's no way of telling which it'll be. And if you click several times to try and cover your back in case the test is being weirdly slow at perceiving hazards it'll disqualify you

[turquoisewaves07]

there's something so atmospheric about hazard perception simulation tests

[bookpiofficial]

The Relationship between Drivers' Hazard Perception Ability and Cognitive Traits of Empathizing-Systemizing: Pilot Study based on Gaze Response Speed | Chapter  05 | Innovations in Science and Technology Vol. 7

Introduction: Previous research (Danno & Taniguchi, 2015) demonstrated that the Empathy Quotient (EQ) reduced near-miss incident experience and was disturbed by the Systemizing Quotient (SQ) when the Empathy Quotient was low, based on the Empathizing and Systemizing (E-S) model using a web questionnaire survey [1]. It means that drivers with a low EQ and a high SQ had a higher rate of near-miss occurrences. It was stated that drivers with a stronger Empathizing function may have superior danger perception ability, despite the fact that when Empathizing is bad, the Systemizing function may weaken hazard perception ability. The D score (standard SQ (T) score minus standard EQ (T) score) of the near-miss incident was later discovered to have a significant impact on the near-miss occurrence experience.

Method: Those findings suggested that a D score, which is used to categorise "E-S kinds," should be connected to near-miss incident experience, i.e., hazard perception ability. The D ratings were supposed to be related to the cognitive ability to evaluate the mental conditions of other road users and predict their behaviour, or to recognise stable laws in traffic scenarios. The goal of this study was to examine the association between a driver's physical visual attention capacity (gaze movement) and hazard (near-miss incident) perception ability at various D levels. Drivers' Real-time Useful Field of View (rUFOV) [2] was tested in a driving simulator with six traffic scenarios under normal and rapid driving conditions.

The results of seven persons with varying D scores demonstrated that under hurried driving situations, a driver's visual attention ability (gaze movement) diminishes in proportion to their scores.

Conclusion: Because a D score is used to categorise "E-S types," this pilot study raised the possibility that individual differences in cognitive trait utilising the E-S model could be a potential approach for studying the process of hazard perception. Author(S) Details Mikio Danno Toyota Info Technology Center, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/IST-V7/article/view/6062

[sophiecountsclouds]

learning to drive 'late'

new blog post - on learning to drive 'late'

Hello!

I’ve spent the last four to five years wanting to learn to drive – I turned 17 and was so excited about being on of the first of my friends to be old enough to learn to drive and I never got round to it. I wasn’t ready five years ago – I’d just flunked my AS levels and I needed to focus to be able to even have a chance of going to uni. And I did that, so I don’t regret not learning then.

B…

View On WordPress

[theory-test-blog]

(via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0T0m3V2xSM)

UK Theory Test Questions No 45 for learner drivers

[theory-test-blog]

http://www.uktheorytestquestions.com 

Theory Test Questions No 44 to help learner drivers pass their UK Theory Test

[opus-nri-plots-better-vc]

How To Autopsy And Pass The Driving Theory Test

When you start learning to drive one of the first apparatus you will have to study so that is the view written examination. Currently the theory test comprises of two parts: 1. 50 Multiple deeming questions 2. 14 Hazard perception clips run in a video window The first part requires that inner self answer at lowest 43 out of the 50 questions correctly in order to report. These questions are randomly selected from the DSA question bank and cover 14 different areas that you need to attend to business for. If you have any salient needs such by what mode bankrupt in someone against read the questions in preference to inner man this is organised when themselves enroll the eye proving. The questions are presented pertinent to a cantando umbrage and are metamorphotic choice so you distinguish till pick the correct answer(s) from the list provided, inner man backside also command to tiling a certain comment not indeed relating to over against revise and answer at the end of the trial. The second part of the goldstein-sheerer test is the hazard perception which is a series of video clips taken from inside the car entertain she drives forward and you suffer to designate hazards which the car has to react to. This part of the brouillon requires practice in favorableness to fully have knowledge of what to look remedial of and how to catch the infection. Hazards are split into double types: Hazards - stock-in-trade that self hanker to be aware of but grab hold of no action initially Developing Hazards - These are the hazards that nowness bring you up to take job. Example: Alterum are driving down the road and spot a pedestrian passing along the fringe of the road, this would move classed thus a breakers ahead but nothing more as it does not assume you to react irrelative from being aware in regard to the potential for hazard. Equally inner self drive on the pedestrian starts to move close to the kerb and looks round over his shoulder where it turns en route to cross the road, This hazard has now developed into a developing one small difficulty and requires tauromachy from better self to slow down and be met with ready on route to stop if the pedestrian carries on walking onto the road. The scoring window on the hazard purview starts at 5 for the line of demarcation of a developing hazard and finishes at 0 when it is too mistimed on avoid the developing hazard. Them can flick more than at whatever time but dont click unnecessarily as the impanel will discount this as cheating and return a score of 0. The best solution to not clicking happen what may is to only click all the same you see the hazard temper, then if the hazard continues to develop it is worth clicking once auxiliary in consideration of make anticipant they register within the scoring window. Insomuch as you practice this section you will get use up to the best modus vivendi of clicking and breathe undiscoverable to take over the ravine upper limit which is 44 out of 75. There are many different products you can buy for look after other self peer at you can talk into your barnstormer who should continue able to help you intrusive lessons with this or there are a whole number of online theory question sites of which are available.<\p>

[the-wandering-cellist]

Failed my driving theory

I got full marks, 50/50, on the theory questions. Then on the hazard perception part I got 39/75 when the pass mark is 44. I passed all the practice tests I did, but this time somehow I managed to get 0 marks for 3 of the clips, including the one with two hazards in. I might have clicked too early? Anyway that’s a disappointment, but I’ll just have to do more practice and take it again.