The Supreme court will take any random decisions except the right and logical one

seen from Slovenia
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from Brazil

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Luxembourg

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States

seen from Belgium

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
The Supreme court will take any random decisions except the right and logical one
It's 2026 and people are still wondering if Transgender folks should have equal rights or not. We still discriminate against them and call them names, treat them as though they are less of human beings.
In India, a bill was introduced in the parliament on March 12, 2026. It's called the Trans Amendment Bill or Bill 79. The bill says that to be recognised a Transgender individual by the law, one must have a medically verified certificate. This means that Indians no longer have the right to determine their own gender. Also, trans folks can only undergo medical procedures if they possess the said certificate. Now, even the doors of hospitals will open selectively.
Unfortunately, this bill has already passed in the Lok Sabha on March 24, 2026, Rajya Sabha on March 25, 2026 and has received presidential assent despite the protests and numerous petitions to the president to not approve of it.
In a matter of time, it will become a law and will be enforced on the people.
I have studied throughout my life that India is a great country. No, it isn't. Shame on India. Shame on the government.
I apologise for having not spoken up sooner on the matter.
We stand against the bill. We stand with the trans.
The Indian Constitution Framers were quite an entertainer.
📸 - Picture Clicked by Me
We've reached finally at the position of an unamended constitution which is actually amended in practise. Liberal democratic character of the Constitution has not been altered by amendments but, minorities are lynched, journalists are prosecuted or worse, killed. Lawyers are attacked for doing their professional duties, activists from civil society are thrown behind bars and the ED is unleashed against all. Then there is targeted prosecution for some and impunity for others. Abuse of criminal law has been raised to the level of a policy. You do not need a gun to be a terrorist. You can be thrown into jail for the thoughts in your mind. You, as a lawyer can argue a case in court and be thrown in jail...The legal profession is in danger. We all know what happened in the Delhi riots, Elgar Parishad and Bhima Koregaon cases; these cases represent the transformation of the victim into an accused in a Court of law by the use of UAPA.
Indira Jaising, senior advocate
Grammar of Anarchy in Modern India
“...it is quite possible in a country like India – where democracy from its long disuse must be regarded as something quite new – there is danger of democracy giving place to dictatorship. It is quite possible for this newborn democracy to retain its form but give place to dictatorship in fact.” These lines are excerpted from Dr Ambedkar’s famous speech “The Grammar of Anarchy”, delivered on November 25th 1949, the eve of the adoption of the Indian Constitution. In this address, Babasaheb defined the difference between a real democracy and a facile one and laid down certain principles that he expected the future generations to adhere to, if they wished for the Indian constitutional democracy to coincide in form and in fact.
It was indeed amid much pomp and publicity that in 2015, the 125th birth anniversary of Dr Ambedkar, the current government decided to attest the tag of National Constitution Day to November 26th. It was just one of the many ways in which governments, over the years, have tried to appropriate the idea of Ambedkar for their vested interests without giving any thought to his ideals. Seen in this context, it becomes important to analyse whether today’s democratic India has lived up to the expectations of the architect of its constitution.
The first principle that Ambedkar mentioned in his speech was that in a real democracy, progress should be brought about only through constitutional methods. He sought an end to methods of Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience which, unless restricted, could paralyze development and saw protests as a symbol of facile democracies. Today’s India is far from realising that goal. We are a country that protests at the drop of a hat. However, more often than not, these protests, far from stifling development, have been used to coerce those in power to take the right step. Be it the 2011 anti-corruption dharnas pushing for passage of appropriate legislations or the CAA-NRC protests or the more recent anti-farm law sit-ins appealing for retraction of unpopular legislations, agitations against the ruling dispensations have been the guiding light of our democracy, seeking adherence to the constitution. So does this mean Ambedkar was wrong in his assessment of protests? No. In his speech, Babasaheb, while advocating for an end to unconstitutional protests, specifically spelled out that when there is no possibility of achieving change through constitutional means, resorting to unconstitutional methods was the only way forward. When constitutionally elected governments show apathy towards the needs or worse, go against the wishes of the very people who put them in power and constitutionally established courts and politically established opposition also leave people in the lurch, the only recourse left for the people is to mobilise and swerve those in power in the right direction. Thus, the very fact that today mass mobilisations and protests are needed to exhort governments to do what they’re elected to do, points towards the disuse and misuse of constitutional machinery.
His second prescription of eschewing the deification of leaders, is perhaps also the most pertinent advice in contemporary times. Today we have downgraded ourselves into a nation of hero-worshipping fanatics, divinizing our political leaders to the point where we fail to accept that they can ever err and ignore them when they actually do so. Living in times when being anti-Modi is routinely equated to being anti-India, Babasaheb’s warning that in politics Bhakti is a sure road to eventual dictatorship rings truer than ever.
Finally, Ambedkar in his speech, recommends us to evolve into a social democracy i.e., we mustn’t be content with the mere political sanction of liberty, equality and fraternity, but should strive to make these ideals, a way of life. Acknowledging the chasm between ‘constitutional guarantees’ and ‘social realities’, Babasaheb had famously remarked that India would, on January 26th 1950, enter into a life of contradictions where political equality would stand in contrast with socioeconomic inequalities. In calling for a social democracy, it was this gap that he sought to bridge. However, it is the sad reality of our times that, even in this aspect we have failed him. 70 more 26th Januarys have passed since that observation was made and still, we find ourselves stuck in the same quagmire. Obdurate lines of caste, class and religious inequalities have been redrawn by politically motivated leaders who find benefit in refusing to let these lines fade; Sectarian affiliations continue to override national unity, crumpling up the ideal of fraternity. And liberty, attacked by both state and non-state actors, has become a mere chimaera.
Thus, our country’s current socio-political standing is far from what the creator of our constitution had hoped it would be. It’s indeed impossible for a country as vast and diverse as ours to embody an ideal democracy, but that shouldn’t mean that we retrograde into becoming a facile democracy. Superficially celebrating the Constitution Day or Mahaparinirvan Diwas will only amount to lip service unless we reinstate adherence to these principles which add life into the soul of India’s democracy, principles prescribed by the father of the constitution himself and principles which will otherwise end up being mere quixotic embellishments for a bleak reality.
"Fundamental Rights Of The Indian Constitution" . Fundamental rights are the basic human rights enshrined in the Constitution of India which are guaranteed to all citizens.
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Happy Republic Day!
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
প্রজাতন্ত্র দিবসের শুভেচ্ছা!🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Here's the preamble to the Indian Constitution, to remind you what the constitution is all about:
It's sad how we've been unable to fulfill these ideals, and have let down our ancestors. But there's still time and things can change... And, I believe, therein lies the essence of Indian democracy.
Jai Hind! জয় হিন্দ!
What is the Registration Process to Vote in India?
Students who turned 18 this year or are going to can vote and contribute to Indian Society and Development. Those who have not yet known about the Registration Process to Vote in India needed details on a simple procedure. You can read the blog from the mentioned link to get detailed information in simple steps.