I don't know to what degree Kahanism is going mainstream, but I agree with the rest of this.
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Kyrgyzstan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Japan

seen from United States
I don't know to what degree Kahanism is going mainstream, but I agree with the rest of this.
Leftists using "kahanist" instead of "zionist" thinking that it's an equivalent work-around to not be perceived as antisemitic, meanwhile they know about as much as kahanism as they do zionism (spoiler: they know next to nothing).
Anti-Zionist types seem to do a frustrating little two -step where sometimes when they say “Zionist” they mean “having any sort of connection to the state of Israel, or the concepts of Eretz Yisrael or Am Yisrael, or with Jews as a self-determining collective” and sometimes they mean “Kahanism” (even though most of them probably don’t know the terms “Eretz Yisrael”, “Am Yisrael”, or “Kahanism”) and because they have already previously defined both as “Zionism”, they then define any sort of connection to Israel as a state, or Israel as a concept, or Jews as a people who self-determine who we are, as Kahanism to be shunned/protested/etc. it is literally maddening.
French-Israeli lawyer, Nili Kupfer-Naouri, caused outrage online after stating that “there are no innocent civilians in Gaza” during an interview.
“ur a kahanist”
bitch you just mean “u disagree with me so ur a fascist.” which is the tactic ultra leftists take that most of you criticize sooooo??
throwing out big generalizing terms that evoke negative emotion just to get someone to stop arguing with you or stop posting or stop talking is a manipulation tactic that shows you have no argument. just saying.
in addition, kach:
who’s saying the arab thing anywhere? you can want judea samaria back and not be kach. you can want the temple mount back and not be kach. you can not want peace with neighbors and want to win the war and still NOT be kach. kach is VERY specific.
other kach party platform points (ty liori for translating from hebrew):
The denial of the democratic regime: replacing the Jewish and democratic state regime with a halachic theocracy.
Separation between Jews and non-Jews: in residential areas, educational institutions, beaches, etc.; demanding that sexual relations between Jews and Gentiles be prohibited by law (the penalty is imprisonment).
The denial of the status of the secular, leftist, or liberal Jew; identifying him as a "Greek" who does not share in a Jewish state. Sometimes these things go so far as to spill the blood of secular leftist leaders.
lmfao MANY jews criticize leftist jews but would never say they have no right to a jewish state or encourage violence against them. i certainly would not and i have posted about that before. i have also talked about supporting arab israelis soooo. plus the importance of democracy.
that automatically disqualifies me as a kahanist. 😂 hope that helps.
so in conclusion: MAYBE DO SOME RESEARCH BEFORE FLAPPING YOUR FINGERS lmao and demonizing your fellow jews.
Tankie logic but switch camps:
"Hamas made the next generation of violent West Bank settlers with October 7th. Kahanism is an idea and you can't destroy an idea."
me: censorship is bad
the shelf of Meir Kahane books in a second hand bookstore:
me, through gritted teeth: censorship. is. bad.