lulabo replied to your post “To All The Boys I’ve Loved Before and its sequels, by Jenny Han”
I've only made it a third of the way through the 2nd book without stalling. I think the movie was one of those adaptations that elevated everything that was great about the books and smoothed out the stuff that I either thought was icky or boring. Which is to say AGREED.
ladyherenya replied to your post “To All The Boys I’ve Loved Before and its sequels, by Jenny Han”
I've read the first two but haven't gotten around to the third. It sounds like I probably don't need to read that one.
Yeah, I would definitely suggest you skip the 3rd.
There were things near the end of the 2nd that were pretty good, but I don’t know if they’re necessarily worth the journey.
So, yes--the movie did a good job of adapting the story, exploring and perhaps exaggerating the essentials (e.g., she didn’t actually faint in the book) while skipping and glossing over some of the weirdness of the books. Genevieve is a bit flattened out in the movie (just a mean girl antagonist rather than a real person) compared to the (2nd) book, but I think that’s the only area in which the books are better.
Also... I wish the covers had Lana Condor on them. The cover model looks too old and too tall.









