Hi Allie I had a question about “Larry baiting”. I’m a larrie and I believe they’ve been together since 2010/11 but one of my friends brought up something that kind got me a bit stuck. When Louis changed the Spotify covers earlier this year for the walls anniversary, wouldn’t it be possible that his management/label had him do it for “Larry baiting”? Because otherwise I don’t think he would be allowed to do anything of the sort. It’s really loud and obvious. How would u explain the whole situation ? Now I’m not saying I’m “unlarrying” because that’s dumb but isnt it possible that even though larry is real, that was done for more attention ?
No, dear, it really wouldn't. Because for it to be used as "larrybaiting", therefore a PR strategy, larry would have to be openly discussed and "displayed" like it was something fine or at least acceptable. I don't think we really talk about this anymore, but larrybaiting 100% happened at some point. In very early days, they used to milk the shit out of larry, their "bromance" was everywhere, larry stylinson was everywhere. I mean...
(the heart-shaped picture is absolutely ridiculous omg look at them this is disgusting)
Stuff like this article is totally profiting from their special connection and lovely "friendship". I think is very easy to tell why 1D was so huge, the boys' friendship was very genuine, people loved to see them together and interact. It makes them look relatable and essentially good guys that you would like to date. And that's when things changed. 1D was always marketed as the boys next door, extremely appealing for the young female audience, but things for larry actually changed when their "bromance" got in the way of how the band was being promoted. Promoting a homosexual relationship was the last thing they wanted when talking for an audience that was basically fantasising about them. And that's when larry became a forbidden subject, they stopped interacting, not leaving any room for interpretations, that's when the narrative against larry and larries began - like, real fans don't support larry stylinson, it's disrespectful, it ruined their friendship, conspiracy theory - basically to help to shut down rumours putting the fans against each other. And that's what we still see to this day, and that's why probably all of our inboxes are full of hate right in this second.
So for it to be an actual strategy to "please" larries, larry would need to be allowed in the first place. And that's obviously not the case. Everything official follows the official narrative where they hate larry, everything indisputable leans towards completely heterosexual images with girlfriend and son. Why would their teams put so much effort into larrybaiting when they would have to deal with damage control immediately after. Larry only shows up when there is room for plausible deniability. Which is exactly what happens in this case.
Now, here's a question to you anon or anyone who believes "larrybaiting" is a thing: would they really do that? I mean, we're talking about guys desperately talking through teddy bears, would they play this game while facing such severe closeting? And if you think larry is not real, but they still larrybait (because that's the only logical explanation for a few things let's face it), why are you supporting them then? Larry ruined their friendship, it's horrible and disrespectful, but they are fine with profiting from it? Feeding it? What kind of people do you think they are.

















