Various doodles of Frev/Hunterverse stuff including my OC Pierre (and his BF Benoît)
And also here’s a mini comic for shits and giggles featuring Pierre and Danton
The voices in Pierre’s head won.

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Italy

seen from Poland

seen from Germany
seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye

seen from Australia
seen from Lithuania

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Greece
Various doodles of Frev/Hunterverse stuff including my OC Pierre (and his BF Benoît)
And also here’s a mini comic for shits and giggles featuring Pierre and Danton
The voices in Pierre’s head won.
Two Worlds.
Just some silly doodles plus requests from comments :3
Hopefully I can finish some bigger art this week, but life´s in the way.... :(
Anyways Happy Halloween!
Kinda like Frankenstein or something
Draw Antoine Lavoisier? He's one of people at french revolution history 🤔 (I'm sure you saw him in your chemistry textbook or science encyclopedia)
Yes
In fact this is my first time drawing him LOL
Condamnation à mort d'Antoine Laurent Lavoisier, 5 mai 1794, page 5 / Death Sentence of Antoine Laurent Lavoisier, May 5, 1794, page 5
Quiz II - The Answer Is Finally Revealed
Are you ready to find out the answer of my last quiz?
Who wrote: "The Newtonians count seven; nonetheless, from the mixture of only three, painters create every shade. Could art then be simpler than nature? […] According to my experiments, it is certain that the primary colors are limited to yellow, red, and blue, because one always succeeds in extracting from the light that decomposes at the edges of bodies only these three distinct colors."
Ready? 🥁*Drum roll*🥁
No, it is not answer A, Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun. She was a brilliant painter, yes—but she did not write this. And honestly, can anyone imagine her running scientific experiments between two portrait sittings?
Now we are left with three serious contenders: B) Antoine Lavoisier? C) Jean-Paul Marat? D) Jacques-Louis David?
Things get interesting here. Both Lavoisier and Marat were scientists, and—just to complicate matters—they both explored theories of color. And then we have Jacques-Louis David, a renowned painter of the revolutionary era, famous not only for his paintings but also for his vision of art.
The answer is... 🥁Drum rolls🥁
Answer C. Jean-Paul Marat.
Jean-Paul Marat was far from the “ordinary” revolutionary of his time—the typical lawyer raised in a quiet bourgeois family. He wasn’t even French. Before becoming the thunderous revolutionary Ami du peuple, Marat was first and foremost a scientist. He trained as a physician, but medicine alone didn’t satisfy him. Soon, he turned to physics and even built his own laboratory. There, he carried out a series of experiments, including research on color theory.
Of course he did—how could he avoid such a subject? Color is essential to anyone interested in physics. That is why Antoine Lavoisier, an eminent scientist of his time (unlike Marat in the eyes of the scientific elites), also investigated the nature of color.
In his work “Notions élémentaires d’optique,” Marat described his experiments on color among many others. In fact, he openly challenged Newton’s theory of color and criticized his methods. Yet Newton was widely endorsed by the Royal Academy of Sciences and celebrated within French intellectual circles—thanks in no small part to Voltaire’s promotion of his work.
Abroad, however, criticism of Newton existed. The Swiss polymath Leonhard Euler, for example, argued against him. But in France, Newtonian devotion reigned. The abbé Pierre Bertholon even wrote a biting article attacking Marat’s audacity:
“Monsieur Marat uses faulty prisms and treats his flawed observations as proof against Newton.”
Yes—Jean-Paul Marat managed to ignite controversy right up to the very end.
Bertholon's article against Marat: Letter published in Charles Vellay "Marat et l'abbé Bertholon", RHRF, 1912/3, p 295.
If my humble work has pleased you, Citizen, you may drop a revolutionary tip on Ko-Fi! ☕️
The argument that Lavoisier was guillotined because he was a scientist is so hilarious, it amazes me how people still fall for it so easily.
Like, if it was really the case, why and how did all the other men of science manage to keep their head then? Magic?