#lesbwian

[gettingintoknives]

Is this the one :(

yea!!!!! thank you Mai i needed that ❤️

[tridentarius]

🍓 ❣️

I was so pleasantly surprised when u followed me on my old blog and u always have the best takes and I know ur tumblr experience must be hell bc I think any post that exceeds 2000 notes should just delete itself lol

mutuals send me a 🍓 and ill compliment u!

[siryouarebeingmocked]

celticpyro

Why is it only Catholics have to sell their priceless artifacts of worship? What about every other religion with gold statues and jewel-encrusted temples? Why is no one joking about making them give all that away?

By the way, the Catholic Church is by far the largest charitable organization in the world, and many of those “golden cathedrals” you so badly want to have sold off double as homeless shelters and soup kitchens. We already give and give and give but every time the joke is “Hm, well that tabernacle looks expensive, why don’t you have it melted down and feed a bunch of starving African kids?”

Just say you have no respect at all for Christianity or what’s considered sacred. You don’t give a shit about poor people, you just have a personal disdain for the Church.

done-with-discourse

Children in Africa aren’t starving because the Catholic Church won’t feed them. They’re starving because we keep sending them money but their corrupt governments keep it for themselves while their people continue to fucking starve.

I’m not even Catholic, but this has been common knowledge for years.

Now, I’m no economics major, but I’m pretty sure all the money Catholics would make from selling all their gold and stuff wouldn’t make much of a dent in world hunger and might actually crash the gold and stuff market.

But of course tumblr thinks “throw other people’s money at the problem!” is a good idea.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

So, folks like lesbwian decided to Make A Point about Harley Quinn’s outfit in the DCEU.

There’s something ironic here. Harley has almost always been a performer, been broad and theatrical. Her basic character theme, visually, is “sexy harlequin”. But apparently these SJWs don’t like the idea of her being sexy and wearing edgy clothes, which makes me wonder if they were fans of her in the first place.

The “dog collar” is actually a human collar, custom-made for her. It’s what kinky people do IRL, sometimes. And ripped clothing has gone in and out of style since, what, the 80s?

Haven’t feminists spent decades arguing women can dress sexily for their own pleasure? I seem to recall SlutWalks a few years ago.

IIRC, the “camera” in the first one is cropped from promotional art to show off the Suicide Squad’s costumes. Which, necessarily, means they want to get as much of their bodies in the shot as they practically can. And the second one is a screenshot from a video meant as a character teaser.

But okay. Let’s say the first one is “centered on her boobs” and is a screenshot from the movie. She appears to be talking to someone, which means the frame had to include them as well. And, of course, the instant in the screenshot isn’t automatically representative of the overall movie, just like a promo video for Birds of Prey isn’t representative of the actual movie, profeminist

In fact, given how Robinson up there seems to think her subjective opinion is some kind of moral stance, I wouldn’t put it past her to deliberately choose images which emphasize her point.

Remember,: Harley Quinn is and always has been a popular cosplay, especially her Suicide Squad version. Shedloads of women go far, far out of their way to dress like the version on the left. It was a very, very popular Halloween costume.

https://comicbook.com/dc/2019/02/03/birds-of-prey-movie-2020-costume-designer-erin-benach/

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/suicide-squad-costume-designer-reveals-margot-robbie-almost-wore-the-classic-harley-quinn-jester-a7142306.html

Also, the costume designers for both Birds of Prey and Suicide Squad are women. Unless OP is talking about the directors of the respective movies. And even then you have to ignore Katana and Waller. Heck, Katana is arguably less sexy in the movie than most of her costumes in the comics.

She’s basically wearing normal clothes, instead of some shiny ninja catsuit.

And last time I checked, the DCEU Joker is 2Edgy, so it makes sense Harley would be too. And Harley has had pigtails in several different incarnations before, because they look like the thingies on her headgear.

Including her original BTAS version.

Oh, and “I know it when I see it” is widely mocked, because it was saying something is “defined” by an entirely subjective judgement. I’m pretty sure the real version it’s not “male gaze” to you is because she isn’t as obviously sexy.

Like I always say, “nobody is more sexist than feminists”.

It’s funny how feminists keep trying to turn Harley into some sort of empowered women icon when she’s literally the opposite. She’s an abused and manipulated woman. In some continuities, she’s found the strength to quit Joker, but not all of them.

Wow, Grey-Warden, that sure is a lot of stuff you’re assuming without any evidence. Also “Daddy’s little monster” is an edgelady shirt. She’s not calling herself crap. >It’s a punk rock reference<. You know what punks often have? Ripped, edgy clothing and overall looks which don’t confirm to cultural conventions! She has a studded belt and spiked bracelets, how did you miss that?

No. Put down the goalposts. Harley Quinn, as portrayed in the movie, is not remotely a normal woman. That’s literally the whole point of the Suicide Squad; black-ops budget Avengers; extraordinary people to fight the battles America never could...be officially connected with. Harley has always been sexy. If you have a problem with that, you didn’t really like Harley Quinn.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

hominishostilis

People really be doing backflips out here to justify emotion-driven arguments with no substance, because WOMYN

Which is funny, because shit like this just reinforces the belief that women are emotional crybabies who can’t calmly debate anything

Sure is interesting how SJWs can’t seem to decide whether men are dangerous emotional ragebeasts who are wrong, fragile emotional whiners   who are wrong,  or emotionless robots who are wrong .

Oh, and also their arguments constantly talk about men, and are often about petty things, but men never really care about the issues at hand, and it’s always about women’s “basic humanity”.

It’s not like men have women in their lives that they care about, right?

This totally isn’t feminists attempting to move the goalposts to make their cause seem more important than it really is and act like they’re always right and somehow incapable of emotional bias.

/s

This isn’t even the first time lesbwian tried to deflect personal responsibility, and I doubt it’ll be the last.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Why is there always someone going "no! I don't wanna take personal responsibility for my spending habits! Stop oppressing me!"

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/05/07/americans-spend-thousands-on-nonessentials/39450207/

And of course it’s lesbwian posting this strawman socialist garbage even though the infographic is about the spending of the average American, because why she? Of course the block happy coward would post something completely wrong.

...So you’re saying OP was wrong?

Literally just making sandwiches is cheaper and healthier than buying food from other people. Like I said, if you have time to extensively complain about how you can’t cook online, you probably have time to cook.

My grooming involves occasionally buying lotion, razor blades, toiletries and cutting my own hair. I’m not sure I’ve spent $100 in the past three months. My biggest recurring expense is my frigging toilet paper.

It’s amazing how someone can literally acknowledge how the infographic post says “average American” and then still use the minimum wage numbers. That is incredibly stupid.

https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-career/how-much-does-the-average-american-get-paid-per-hour.html/

Oh look, the average American is apparently paid almost four times more than minimum wage.

But why would I expect common sense from these folks.

Which...would be true. Some go broke because they waste money on crap they don’t need.

Apparently poor people are completely immune to poor money manageme-

Wait a second. That’s not an actual counterargument. If people become and stay poor because they waste their money, that means this applies to them. You don’t have to waste as much money as the infographic, specifically, to keep yourself in poverty.

People waste money on crap they can’t afford all the time, at every economic level. Poor people are not immune. 

I have seen many people fighting tooth and nail to defend the practice of poor people spending hundreds a month eating out. Eat fast food for breakfast and lunch and occasionally dinner, and you could very, very easily end up in the $200 range. I don’t think it’s laziness, I think lots of people just don’t know any better. 

Except for the “I hate personal responsibility” folks, of course. In their case, the system is apparently forcing them to eat bad food.

[gogetyrshovel]

Happy birthday! Wishing you the best 💖

thank you!!!

[tauruz]

🐄 ❣️