seen from Brazil
seen from Uruguay

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Colombia
The canon queer character of the day is:
Alexandra “Alex” Chen from Life is Strange: True Colors, who is bisexual.
Life is Strange: Reunion releasing on March 26th, 2026
CHLOE PRICE in Life is Strange: Reunion
@LifeIsStrange: Separate the real from the rumor... Join us for the exclusive reveal of the next Life is Strange game: youtu.be/b2eHeCKYHJc January 20. 10am PST / 1pm EST / 6pm GMT / 7pm CET.
Maisy Stella as Chloe Price for the live-action adaptation of Life Is Strange via Instagram
stuff like this is why it’s important to recognize that don’t nod’s canon differs from deck nine’s interpretation of the story/characters. people aren’t just whining or “not accepting canon” when they say that bts, de, and re are not part of the actual intended canon. and you still can enjoy d9’s interpretation while recognizing that! i’ve never understood why it needs to be one or the other, or why people feel the need to get so defensive when it gets pointed out, especially when the material already has canon inconsistencies, and therefore it should be obvious that it’s basically an alternate universe separate from how the story and characters were actually intended. michel’s comments also reinforce my opinions on before the storm; i’ve always thought that they should have never given rachel a new backstory. had they made the game with the og canon in mind, they could’ve just shown rachel through chloe’s eyes, which would’ve naturally explained the romanticized portrayal given it’s chloe’s perspective, while still keeping the mystery around her character since we’d still be seeing a somewhat limited, subjective version of her. instead, they gave her a full familial backstory that directly contrasts with canon and doesn’t really go anywhere in the context of lis1. it’s unfortunate. bts def has other problems too (like the, imo, censoring of chloe’s character and other canon inconsistencies) but that direction has always been what mostly bothered me about it.
also re: complex characters and morally grey ones. what michel explained is why a lot of discourse among lis fans around the more prominent and generally loved characters feels silly to me. they are not supposed to be depictions of perfect people, and not recognizing their complexities feels like a disservice to the story and characters themselves. the tendency to either vilify or completely sanctify a character in order to justify disliking or loving them reflects a kind of moral puritanism that’s increasingly common in fandom spaces, and it’s unfortunate to see people engage with media in this way.