Craft book review: Story Genius by Lisa Cron
As promised last weekend, here’s a slightly more full review of Story Genius: How to Use Brain Science to Go Beyond Outlining and Write a Riveting Novel (Before You Waste Three Years Writing 327 Pages That Go Nowhere) by Lisa Cron. But to sum up, the very short version:
1) The tone of this book is kind of insufferable;
2) The approach this book suggests is actually pretty useful.
I often find craft books a little difficult to get into because most of them are either a) written for a total beginner (which I am not), or b) focused primarily on literary stuff (which is super not my jam and often unhelpful for genre writers), or c) focused on an approach that is total anathema to me. I am at a point as a writer where yes, I very much want to level up and improve, but I also have a writing process that works pretty well and has to be a foundation for any improvements I try. Basically: telling me to just craft characters and let them have conversations until a story forms isn’t going to work for me (sorry, Bird by Bird) and neither will writing without any idea of where I’m going and unearthing a story by magic, I guess? (Sorry, On Writing.) I am open to suggestions but those things are just unhelpful for me. So I was leery of Cron’s approach, which is focused on using character to discover a story, and really turned off by how much of the book was Cron explaining why Everything You Know Is Wrong (it isn’t) and why her method is the One True Way (it’s not).
The book won me over a bit when it finally got around to actual practical matters: start with your initial glimmer of an idea and identify what it is about that idea that interests you. Use that to flesh out your premise and a protagonist will come with it -- and then focus on the protagonist to figure out the story.
I actually appreciated this method a lot more than I expected to. I’m someone who has always discovered my character through writing the story -- pre-planning doesn’t tend to work for me. But the pre-planning methods I’ve seen before have been things like character sheets, which don’t work because they’re so arbitrary. Deciding, say, what the character’s biggest fear is ahead of time might be useful, if it serves the story, but it also might be completely random and useless. Cron’s method, however, is to flesh out the character based on the premise and conflict built into it.
Per Story Genius, fleshing out the character goes back to what would make for the best possible character to fit the premise you’re interested in. You aren’t pulling together arbitrary details, you’re crafting pivotal moments in the character’s backstory that will lead to the highest possible tension level when you get to the frontstory.
All of that was actually very useful for me. But where it gets less so is as it gets from backstory into outlining (sorry, “blueprinting”) the story itself. That’s where I think Cron’s method might be useful for writers who are at that 101 level and not quite sure how to get started -- but again, that’s not me. And her disdain of any kind of external story structure grated on me, because structure is a huge part of my process. So no, I’m not going to write out an outline card for each potential scene (and then not use a lot of them) and I’m not going to start writing until I know what the overall story is. Because that’s a huge part of how I write. But using some of her character approach has actually been very helpful for me regardless, as I’m preparing to outline a novel, in helping me figure out my protagonist and conflict, and other characters from my protag’s life who have to be involved (and what they do). It’s a slight shift in my thinking, even without using the “blueprint” method Cron suggests, and I’m glad I gave it a try.
With all that said, the idea that any of this is based on “brain science” is laughably nonsensical. There are basically no citations except, like, this one study that one time? And it feels very much like the claim that you should write this way because SCIENCE!!! is supposed to make this book authoritative. But like I said: it’s not (no writing advice can be), and instead left me rolling my eyes at those claims. (Like I said: the tone is insufferable.)
Overall, three and a half stars. It’s worth reading through and mining for ideas that work for you, but it’s not the life changing, revelatory method it claims to be.