Fic for the Beach Day
An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works
seen from Portugal
seen from Russia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Yemen

seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from China
seen from Paraguay
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
Fic for the Beach Day
An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works
some of these stories included sensitive content or smut but it will always be mentioned
english is not my first language, please be comprehensive
MALE | GN | FTM
𝔐arvel
𝔇ℭ
𝔄ctors
𝔍ake's characters
𝔖plit/𝔊lass
𝔒ther 𝔐ovies
bannières @/saradika-graphics and @/thecutestgrotto
Other factions
The Human v. Mal'akh conflict The Grand Families shields
The Service and Linear Gallifreyan
D'Jinn, Propaganda, and Placement Mal'akh Origin Notes
Mal'akh .U.K. Henges and Stone circles?
The Points of the Star The Star Chamber and The Service symbols The Service Profile
The Samyaza Rebellion Basic Overview Whatever Happened to the Samyaza Lads?
Grigori/Edimmu symbols
The Samyaza Rebellion Drammatis Personae The Rwenzori Fragment & Old High Gallifreyan= Adamic? The High Place Location
Order of the Black Sun Analysis
Symbol
The Order of the White Peacock Royal Amusements, An Order of the White Peacock front? The Order's known timeline
The Order's Secretary's Name
The Order's symbol
Faction Hollywood Eye of Eternity logos and badges
Eye of Eternity wedding invitation
Other faction symbols Linecross logos
The House of the Rising Sun logo
Eremites symbol The Elemental Empire/Four Elementals symbol Free Time terrorist symbol Fifth Axis symbol and uniform colours
Dan Bown’s The Lost Symbol AU - TLS x BTVS
-> AU characters
Thoughts on The Lost Symbol
So finally finished watching The Lost Symbol. Ultimately I think it was a disappointment despite a solid cast. Fundamentally, I think The Lost Symbol is one of the weaker, if not the weakest of the Langdon books, so I was always a little wary of this story being adapted. As a story, it has far less intrigue compared to The Da Vinci Code, Angels & Demons, and Inferno. And it makes sense why The Lost Symbol got passed over for a movie adaptation while the other three got made into movies.
The show basically only keeps the barebones of the book, with the basic character elements. Unfortunately it doesn't fill it with much else. The show started off quite well and I think it picked up towards the end. But a good stretch of 4-5 episodes felt like they were treading water. For a show that is supposed to be a bit of a puzzle box, it got boring quite fast. That's also part of the problem with the book. The books based on European history take into account very well known European figures and history whereas a lot of what is present in The Lost Symbol is knowledge that only the characters really know about. It also doesn't help is that the final reveal is fundamentally designed to be underwhelming.
The cast is what saves it in my opinion. Ashley Zuckerman is excellent as young Langdon. Very appropriately nerdy, but his eyes seem to show a wisdom behind them. You can't go wrong with Eddie Izzard, though he was definitely wasted in the first half of the season. Valorie Curry is excellent as Katherine and she and Ashley have excellent chemistry. Beau Knapp as Ma'lakh is appropriately menacing and villainous, though the backstory is still not very clear to me. How did he go from point A to point B still seems a bit drastic. Rick Gonsalez was good but his character seemed like he was there to just be a bit of a sidekick and provide Langdon and Katherine some muscle. Montano as Sato was also solid.
All in all, a little disappointing. The show does end the season, teasing a new mystery. It doesn't sound like they are following any other Langdon books just from what they described. I am curious if they keep new characters with Langdon or they keep finding ways for Katherine, Nunez, Peter etc... to be involved. The books always have a completely new set of characters for Langdon to be interacting with.
I’m writing a book that features angels, and while I don’t want them to be the typical christian “robe and wings” image, I’ve heard that many of the other interpretations of angels in media are appropriative of Judaism’s view of angels, and I don’t want to do that. Are there any ways of depicting angels I should definitely avoid? Would depicting them as pure light be alright or no? Thanks!!
.
14x11 and 14x12: Epic Bookends
Found this in drafts and I thought I’d post it. Interesting how the breaking of the codependency has been pulled on with ever increasing sincerity since 13x20. In 15x05 it was a stark thread running through the episode and no, I do not believe the answer to how best to break it is through one brother killing the other. I mean, seriously tut, Chuck, tut. :)
TFW are going through a bit of a tough time, aren’t they? Poor men. Isn’t it glorious? Okay, don’t get me wrong, I feel for them, but all the things that this tough time might be setting up for is making me want to shimmy-shake.
Firstly, I’d like to outline my view of Dean and how I see him relating himself to Sam this season, because these bookends are all about commenting on the breaking codependency.
The codependency, to my mind, was cracked down the middle in 13x20, in that final scene, where Dean realises what his view on life, and family, has meant for Sam’s view on life and family -->
This view is not what Dean wants for Sam. This attitude of them being so closely tied to one another that whatever happens to one of them, happens to both of them, is unhealthy, and Dean’s eyes finally opened to this fact as he, through Sam’s statement, realised exactly how toxic his influence has been on Sam, and it lent him an important tool to begin digging into the self-reflection that’s been going on this season.
Because why has his influence been toxic? Where does this toxicity stem from? Having his behaviour marked as an actual threat to Sam was the needed push for Dean to gain new self-perspective, and through it, grow actually aware of his shadow.
(which is, of course, why he very soon after comes face to face with Michael, who represents Dean’s shadow, just as the Empty represents Cas’ shadow)
Now, Dean has absolutely struggled with Sam’s newfound independence as Chief of their tribe, but he’s also very much accepted Sam taking the lead, and supported it. This whole season, he’s been trying to let go.
Let go of his old view of who he’s been told he has to be, let go of the past, let go of how he’s always leaned on Protect Sammy as his core motto.
Now, Sam is a good leader and he’s proven that this season. He’s moved into that role very aware that Dean might object to it, but he’s stood his ground and hasn’t simply handed over the cape, as it were, to Dean. However, Sam has also struggled with his newfound role, battling with his own search for the answers to who he is and who he wants to be.
Questions he won’t be able to answer properly until the codependency is over and done with, because Dean’s need of him over the years has become such a defining part of how Sam understands his place in the world, and what his purpose is, that Sam doesn’t know who he is without it.
But through Dean being possessed and taken away, Sam was given the necessary foundation to remember his own independence, and he was given a clean motivation to step into the leader shoes as it was wholly tied to getting Dean back. It removed the fear of what it would mean (and the thought that it’s easier to follow than to lead) and gave Sam purpose, which makes any situation easier to face.
He’s the born leader. We’ve gotten to see that this season. Sam has gotten to feel and experience what it’s like to lead this season. It’s a position he should embrace without fear or hesitation, but the hesitation is there, stemming from the fear in not entirely trusting himself yet.
None of these men entirely trust themselves yet, I would venture to say.
But what we’ve been given in these last couple of episodes make me feel perhaps overly positive that they will learn how to, possibly soon, and once they dare trust in themselves, because they know who they are and who they want to be, then they can all answer the question What Do I Want?
Yeah? Everything that’s happening in the narrative right now is pushing for this, to my mind. So. Let’s look at the bookends and I’ll explain why this might all be setting up for questions being answered.
14x11
1. Dean’s Got a Plan
So we get Dean packing a duffel with tools he’ll need for something unknown. He’s clearly determined and focused. (and looks like there’ll be welding) (and oh boy will there be)
He then steps out of the room and gives us a look down the hall -->
If that expression he’s wearing isn’t resignation, then I don’t know what is. It’s like he’s considering, just for a moment, to go see Cas one last time, but thinks better of it, because there’s no telling where that might lead, and he can’t afford distractions.
So, then.
Off he goes to see his brother, and here’s where things begin to take a turn for the highly interesting to me, because my first impression of this scene and how it plays out is this: in Dean’s behaviour is a clear cry for help.
I’ll dig into why I think that, bear with me, but it’s a cry that ripples into 14x12. (and it’s loud)
While researching for an EXCITING CURRENT PROJECT, I stumbled across the Beast of Gévaudan, and doesn’t it seem like exactly the sort of thing Lawrence Miles would sneak into Faction Paradox somewhere? It would fit right alongside the lines of Kaspar Hauser in The Book of the War or, I don’t know, the parallels with Les Liaisons dangereuses in The Adventuress of Henrietta Street. And sure enough, the dates are almost too perfect: in the True History of Faction Paradox audios, a whole clan of Mal’akh are set loose in Italy in 1763, just a year before the Beast started hunting in the mountains of France. And how are the Mal’akh described in Political Animals? “Hunting dogs.”
… which means, of course, that the next time I listen to True History I won’t be able to picture Jala as anything but a goofy wolf-dog …