Can't unsee it.
seen from Philippines

seen from Egypt

seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Colombia

seen from Bolivia
Can't unsee it.
MARK LOEWEN
MARK LOEWEN
Mark Loewen might be my favorite paleontologist if I were to have one
Mark Loewen knows his dinosaurs.
The prolific researcher has traveled the globe to study them, from Madagascar to Mexico. Besides being a research associate at the Natural History Museum of Utah, he's also a geology and geophysics professor who teaches the popular "World of Dinosaurs" course at the University of Utah. He routinely dissects the original "Jurassic Park" with his students; what it gets right, what it gets wrong. So what does Loewen make of the "Jurassic World" trailer that debuted Tuesday morning?
The teaser offered fleeting glimpses of the dinos â and Chris Pratt's furrowed brow about a mysterious new one. Loewen thinks the movie looks like a good reboot, and his analytical eye found a satisfying improvement over the original, a couple dubious representations — and a potential homage to the real-life experiments to bring dinosaurs back to life. Here's what "Jurassic World" seems to get right, and wrong, about what one day could become our scaly, murderous overlords.
• Raptors are supposed to have feathers.
The killing machines running alongside Pratt are green and scaly, even though we know that velociraptors had feathers. Loewen figures the movie keeps the raptors that way for continuity's sake. Besides the featherless bodies, they're also disproportionately large like the first "Jurassic Park's" raptors â though their size was kind of, sort of vindicated later. The same summer that the original came out, paleontologists discovered our state dino — Utah raptor — which about matches the size of Spielberg's creations.
Velociraptor also isn't a Jurassic-era dino; it belongs to the Cretaceous.
• Possible spoiler warning: The hybrid dinosaur might be part spinosaurus.
Loewen is speculating, but he figures the scientists used the iconic T-Rex and a spinosaurus — a predator famous for the sail on its back — to make their mystery monster. There is a quick shot of the beast's underbelly, and it seems to have the arms and bipedal legs of the theropod family that its parents belong to. And "by looking at the teeth, [Pratt] pulls a tooth out of the Battle Ball, whatever you want to call it," Loewen said, "⦠and that's almost certainly a spinosaurus tooth."
• Same-era dinos actually appear together.
As visitors paddle down a river, their kayaks float by stegosaurus and brachiosaurus, two dinosaurs that actually would have coexisted. That might not seem like much, but it's a noticeable improvement over the first movie. Remember when Alan Grant and Ellie Sattler, who have just seen their first live dinoaur, look across the valley and see older-era braciosaurs in a small lake with the much more recent parasaurolophus? Those species are so far apart in time, the chronological gap between them is greater than the gap between parasaurolophus and us, Loewen said.
• The shark-eating reptile needed a lot more water
If you're wondering "what was that behemoth?" — it's a member of the pliosaur family, big aquatic reptiles that technically aren't dinosaurs. If Loewen had to guess, he thinks it's based on liopleurodon, a fearsome predator of its mid-Jurassic heyday. Devouring the shark was a great homage to the ill-fated cow of the first movie, Loewen said, though there's a distinct problem with the pliosaur's environment.
"No way that water was deep enough to hold that specimen," he said. Besides a renowned dinosaur expert, Loewen is also a scuba diver. That shallow, Caribbean-esque water in the tank is probably no more than a few dozen feet deep. The spectacular monster that lunged out of the water was easily about 100 feet long, and would have needed a much deeper tank, he said. Regardless, it sure looked spectacular, Loewen added.
But there's one more question surrounding the pliosaur's existance for Loewen: where did they get the DNA? Mosquitoes aren't exactly known for feeding on marine life. In fact, "DNA doesn't last in the stomach of a mosquito;" termites' stomachs are better at preserving DNA, he said. And speaking of recreating dinosaursâ¦
• The 'Dino-Chicken' Project
The trailer alludes to learning more about dinosaurs through recent genetic research — an homage, Loewen speculates, to the research of Jack Horner. The scientist, a real-life basis for Alan Grant and a consultant on the films, has beeen devoting himself to what's been called the "Dino-Chicken Project": reverse-engineering dinosaurs from the DNA of their evolutionary descendents, birds. So far, scientists have been able to modify embryos so that chickens have teeth and the three-fingered hands of the archaeopteryx.
If mankind ever does make a dinosaur theme park on an island?
"I'd pay a thousand dollars" to go, Loewen said.
Michael McFall
Twitter: @mikeypanda
Thanks goes to oldoddandowly for telling me about this piece!
...The most famous of Utah’s fossil sites are Jurassic classics. Localities such as Dinosaur National Monument and the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry are rich boneyards from the heyday of Late Jurassic giants. But that’s just one relatively narrow slice of history in a state that offers so much undiscovered Mesozoic history. In 2010, the year before I moved to Utah, paleontologists named eight new dinosaur genera from sites in the state. Several more have followed, with a greater number still in preparation.
At the Top of the Grand Staircase, edited by Alan Titus and Mark Loewen.
The vast majority of the newly-named animals are not from long-known localities, but from Cretaceous sites between 145 and 66 million years old that are only just beginning to be revealed. And of all these places brimming with dinosaur fossils, southern Utah’s Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument has most forcefully captured the attention and imagination of researchers. Not only are the fossil organisms being found there new to science, but the variety of life – from plants to turtles to mammals to dinosaurs – has raised new puzzles about evolution and what researchers previously expected about Late Cretaceous history. The new technical volume At the Top of the Grand Staircase edited by paleontologists Alan Titus and Mark Loewen synthesizes what has been uncovered so far....
Brian Switek's review of the book I got for Christmas. I am excited for when I get the time to sit down and read it!