I support Palestinian self‑determination. My concern is whether the current factional and militia structure would allow that state to be genuinely free?
Anon, have you heard of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs?
Needs must be met in order: physiological needs, safety, belonging, esteem, and self-actualization, and each level depends on the foundation of the level beneath it.
You can't have self-actualization without esteem, can't have esteem without belonging, can't have belonging without safety, and you can't have safety until physiological needs are met.
Now imagine a pyramid of problems Palestinians must face in order to create a state.
Whether or not such a state would be genuinely free is at the top of the pyramid. Your concern (while wholly valid) is wildly premature.
At the bottom of the pyramid (the foundation everything else rests on) is the most basic question: does a critical mass of Palestinian political culture actually want a state at peace with Israel, or will it stick with maximalism and eliminationism, demanding that Israel cease to exist? Until that's resolved, nothing above it is stable.
One tier up: Does that same political culture want a secular, pluralist state, or an Islamist one? You can want peace with Israel and still want a theocracy. I'd argue that not every Islamic theocracy is Islamist. You can want a democracy and still harbor eliminationist positions about your neighbor. So...these decisions have to be made and popularly embraced before a state can be planned.
Above that: Unified, competent, honest leadership. The Palestinian national movement is currently split between a corrupt, sclerotic PA that controls parts of the West Bank without popular support and a corrupt designated terrorist organization that controls Gaza and started the war that leveled it, actively seeking maximum death and destruction of Gaza's people and property.
A state requires a government which is capable of governing, controls corruption, and can gain the trust of at least a plurality of the people.
There isn't anything like that at the moment (and hasn't really ever been) - and such things are rarely built quickly.
Above that: Territorial continuity. Gaza and the West Bank don't share a border. Can a state in two non-contiguous pieces really be a state? Assume Israel agrees to land swaps to bridge the two with a corridor: how is that done with security for all involved?
Above that: Institutional capacity. Courts. Tax collection. Civil service. A currency or monetary framework. An economy not dependent on aid. The boring infrastructure of actually governing.
And at the top (tier six) is whether the state would be genuinely free.
The question of whether a Palestinian state would be genuinely free is worth asking - but it's tier six.
We're still negotiating tier one. The foundation must be built before anyone can argue about the architecture.














