#medical model

[neurotypicalabusesurvivor]

By the way being afab doesn't excuse ableism nore does it excuse your desire to have a NT child so you get out of unpaid emotional and neurological labor.

[knithacker]

Pattern To Crochet a Larynx Medical Model ... In Case You're Wondering, That's a Voice Box: 👉 https://buff.ly/0wyr0UB - designed and crocheted by Aileen Robinson of Leen Green Bean who also sells them already made.

[neurotypicalabusesurvivor]

The issue with the medical model of disability is the existence of treatment but ratter treatment + individualism + neuronormativity. I myself have massively benefit form ART therapy but i will never blame my trauma disorder for my quality of life that is on society as a whole.

So maybe a more accurate of name for the medical model is the individualistic medical model of disability.

[deepfriedthrifting]

Saturday morning thrifting

[neurotypicalabusesurvivor]

Fetuses are not people so why are you making such a big deal about women saying that poor people and disabled people shouldn't have kids. Because it is eugenics and being a women doesn't give you an excuse to be a bigot.

It enables the patriarchy. The patriarchy is a economic system that exploitation people for reproductive labor by breaking people down into 3 class a productive class, a reproductive class and a ruling class. In order for women to be free form sexism the patriarchy must be completely destroyed. The only problem with this is that women are not the only part of the reproductive class that exist. Kids, queers, sex workers and people who are targeted by eugenics are all part of the reproductive class. There is no matriarchy while eugenics exist.

All people benefit from some degree form ableism this includes all disabled people and all women (including disabled women). This is because ableism reduces the amount of labor you have to do by dumping it onto the disabled person. Disabled people work a triple shift of the normal labor people have to do in addition to the emotional labor and managing their disability. So instead of none disabled people learning how to manage their own biology they instead dump that responsibility onto disabled people. Disabled people are often coheresed into medical treatment and therapy not for their own personal benefit but for the benefit of others. To maintain probability for the bourgeoisie or go homeless. To come across as "pro social" or lose relationships despite the fact emotions are socially constructed and that losing privilege feel like oppression. That fact that many feminist objects to the unpaid domestic labor women do but not to the unpaid labor of managing a disability screams of a lack of intersectionality.

So here the thing the belief that drive women to abort fetus for eugenics reason affect people who are here. Most people see disability as 100% biological but if disability was 100% biological being gay, trans, a ran away slave or a woman with big emotions would never have been label a disability to begin with. The belief that disability is 100% biological infantilizes society by saying society is not the problem the disabled's person biology is. Our society pathologies people who are socially undesirable and people who are biologically incompatible with the existing hierarchy. Ableism exist to reduce the amount of labor people who are biologically compatible with the system has to do.

When people get abortion on the ground of them being disabled you are removing the choice if a disabled person want to exist or not form a disabled person. You have no idea if that disabled person wants to exist or not and as a person who benefits form adult supremacy and ableism should not make that choice for a disabled person. So, we should let the disabled person make that choice by having them choose if they want medically assisted suicide or not.

Saying women have the right to get an abortion due to eugenic reasons is saying that women are more important than disabled people. This is textbook ableism you are saying a group of people are more important than disabled people. The problem is that disabled people face structural and systematic oppression. The problem is that feminist contently try to label sexist men as mentally ill and try to get out of collective reasonability by telling men to go to therapy. This is not to say that sexist men don't have the right to be rehabilitated just that it not a mental illness and therefore not a therapist responsibility to fix them. The thing is everyone in society is responsable for holding men accountable and labeling your political opponents as mentally ill is a deeply ablest thing to do. This is no different than calling school shooter or pedophiles are mentally ill. Having a shitty ideology is not a mental illness. You are trying to distance yourself form socially undesirable people by labeling them mentally ill.

Am I saying abortion on eugenic grounds should be illegal. Yes, but not under current capitalist hierarchal system. If I had enough political power to make all form of eugenics illegal, then i also would have enough political power to socialize healthcare, all day daycare, give people a ubi to compensate them for their domestic work they do and make the social model of disability exist. In other words, disabled people and women would be so supported that the only reason anyone would get an abortion on eugenic grounds is for purely ableist reasons. However, under are current hierarchal system even if a women hated eugenics they may just be cohesion into it by the system at this point the women should not be judged.

Remember eugenic is anti-choice as it violates the choice of both the women and the disabled person right to choose if they want to exist or not.

[chronbinary]

[chronbinary]

fun at the anatomy mall 🍌🍋🍊🍉🍈🍇🫁🫀👍✨

[my-neurodivergent-education]

"...In a number of cases, conventional autism research describes ways in which autistic people outperform nonautistic people in scientific tasks yet interpret those achievements as somehow revealing a problem. That is, data that in fact reveal strengths in autistic people are paradoxically - and bizarrely - interpreted in a negative way, as a consequence of a 'deficit' or 'impairment' (Dawson & Mottron, 2011; Dinishak, 2016; Gernsbacher, Dawson, & Mottron, 2006; Robertson, 2010).... ...This tendency to interpret autistic performance negatively is seen further in the research literature on autistic intelligence, which demonstrates that it is often the research design itself that is the cause of the issue... ...Such negative interpretations and the research design that reinforces them have consequences beyond research itself. Autistic scientist, Michelle Dawson, has long argued that the habit of casting autistic people as 'less than' has resulted in autistic people being subjected to medical and other interventions that are not as fully supported by evidence as they should be. This is particularly the case with one dominant intervention, Applied Behavioural Analysis (Dawson, 2004). Even as recently as 2019, autistic people have been subjected to 'aversive' treatments in behavioural intervention research (Verriden & Roscoe, 2019), including electric shock as punishment at the highly controversial Judge Rotenberg Educational Center of Canton Massachusetts, which is still open for business despite having been condemned for torture by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture (Neumeier & Brown, 2020). The persistent focus on deficits serves to support these dehumansing attitudes; seeing autistic people as 'less than human' (Goffman, 1990; see also Cage, di Monaco, & Newell, 2019) legitimises the use of electric shock in this instance."

-- Pellicano, E. and den Houting, J. (2022), Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. J Child Psychol Psychiatr, 63: 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13534