blake kathryn
Jules of Nature
roma★
Andulka
The Bowery Presents
Misplaced Lens Cap
Aqua Utopia｜海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
titsay
oozey mess
if i look back, i am lost
One Nice Bug Per Day
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Sweet Seals For You, Always
macklin celebrini has autism
No title available
noise dept.
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
official daine visual archive
Not today Justin
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from United States
seen from Sweden
seen from Singapore
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from Netherlands
seen from Canada
seen from Philippines
seen from France
seen from Brazil
seen from Türkiye
seen from T1
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom
@neurotypicalabusesurvivor
Disability benefits shouldn’t be tied to the income of a disabled person’s partner/spouse/parent.
Do you hear me?
DISABILITY BENEFITS SHOULDN’T BE TIED TO THE INCOME OF A DISABLED PERSON’S PARTNER/SPOUSE/PARENT.
This is the straight forward way to deprive a disabled person of their financial freedom and independence and trap them into possible abusive relationships.
happy disability pride month to mean cripples, nasty addicts, people with down syndrome who arent nice and talk constant shit, wheelchair users that WILL run you over, autists that dont care and arent about to pretend to, people who lie to their psychiatrists, people that sit on the floor in public places with no benches, amputees that lie profusely about "what happened"; to the "noncompliant", the "drug seeking", the "mean", the "difficult" and the "undeserving", and so on and so forth, i love us all and we deserve the world actually mwah mwah
“It just means you have to work double as hard as most people!”
Well maybe I don’t WANT to work double as hard as abled people!! Maybe I deserve a BREAK!! Maybe I’ve been working MORE THAN double as hard for MY WHOLE LIFE and it’s led me to immense burnout & caused me to develop several MORE disabilities!! Maybe I should be ACCOMMODATED so I don’t have to KILL MY BODY AND BRAIN over trying to do what abled people can do!! Maybe I DON’T have to work double as hard!! Maybe if there’s the option to let me NOT work double as hard, I should have it, because I’m already working double as hard JUST TO SURVIVE!!
Why do you think disabled people deserve less rest than mentally & physically abled people?
Tumblrer 1: "monogamy is an oppressive system and shaming cheaters is part of that. Why do you even care if your husband cheats."
Tumblrer 2: "I agree that monogamy is oppressive. However, you should cosider the specific material conditions. Most women are at risk of losing their only source of income and thus survival if their husband cheats on them. If you want to abolish monogamy -as do I- you gotta make sure all women are able to be economically independent from men first."
Tumblrer 1: [raging islamophobia]
ultimately monogamy exists as a social contract between men about evenly distributing the women they own, so why self-proclaimed feminists don't think that we should work towards abolishing it is baffling
When I see a questioning endo system describe their plurality and its just… normal internal monologue stuff. “uhm i answer my own questions in my head” thats called having an internal dialogue. “but sometimes i act like different people around others” thats a normal adaptive social behavior. “well i forget things once!!” FORGETTING IS NORMAL!! I CANT STAND IT ANYMORE. 10,000 BEES UPON YOUR EXACT LOCATION.
If you ever wondered why they call tattoos and piercings "unprofessional" and "unsophisticated"
Source: Lainey Molnar
"im a misandrist but not in a terfy way"
theres no feminist way to be a misandrist that doesnt bleed into terf ideology.
if youre a misandrist, then i dont trust you not to be racist towards men of color.
if youre a misandrist, then i dont trust you not to be ableist towards disabled and/or neurodivergent men.
if youre a misandrist, then i dont trust you not to be intersexist towards intersex men or intersex people that look like men.
if youre a misandrist, then i dont trust you not to be transphobic towards trans women who don't want to pass or cant pass for whatever reason.
if youre a misandrist, then i dont trust you not to be transphobic towards trans men.
if youre a misandrist, then i dont trust you not to be exorsexist towards nonbinary men or nonbinary people who might look like men.
if youre a misandrist, i dont fucking trust you. you are not an ally to me or to marginalized people.
Being a misandrist means you only think cishet white ablebody Christian men exist.
And be less serious, I know telling people they support eugenics is an asshole move, but that's what selective abortion is
"I don't want to raise a child with disabilities." Then don't have kids. Stop trying to get pregnant, don't even adopt a kid, because even if your kid isn't born with a disability they could end up disabled because life is like that.
"I don't want a baby that might die shortly after being born." Then don't have kids. Stop trying to get pregnant. Your baby, even if all the tests and screening says everything is perfect, could die minutes, hours, days after birth. This is a tragic reality for many parents.
You aren't ready to have a child if you haven't come to terms with the fact that your child might be disabled, or might die. You aren't emotionally or spiritually prepared enough to have a child if you get pregnant thinking you can just abort when you're not happy with projected outcomes.
Make peace with having an imperfect child, and quit getting pregnant with the intention of aborting the moment you're unhappy.
From paaunow's Instagram
It is a high-point of toxic individualism to look at the many ableist barriers in this society and insist that the only real solution to this society being hostile to disability should be aiming to somehow fully cure or eugenically abort individual disabled people.
The pro life movement is pro eugenics. Any movement that dosent demand the socialization of all basic human needs is pro eugenic.
Pro life people do not care if a unfit to reproduced group has a good life after they are born. Leaving them with bad quality of life.
The pro life movement is ableist. They don't believe in accommodating disability to the point t of trivialities. They won't redirect police and military funding to support disabled people.
Don't get me wrong I do not like the pro choice movement because it weaponizes abortion rights to justify eugenics, but I also hate the pro life movement.
As someone who is pro-choice, I think we need to have an important discussion. You can be pro-choice but also anti-eugenics, and I think a lot of people see abortion as a black and white subject where if you're against any form of abortion. I say this because I've had multiple other pro-choice people get mad at me for questioning this.
(Note: This person got banned for this post. Don't support this crap.)
In light of recent events, abortion posts have been popping up more. And that's a good thing! But that being said, there is something we need to address in our movement. I've noticed a lot of people are saying "Women should unconditionally have the right to choose what they do with their bodies.", and that's valid! The state shouldn't have control over people's bodies. But that being said, there's a specific way in which people are supporting that, and we need to talk about it. People have been using abortion to support eugenics, specifically, a lot of people are trying to say it isn't eugenics to abort a fetus solely because the mother sees their traits as undesirable (traits like skin color, genetic condition like autism, etc).
I have seen multiple pro-choice advocates state that since women should have access to an abortion unconditionally, it's okay if the sole purpose that someone gets an abortion is that they were already planning on having the child, but then out of nowhere get their child screened, discover that they might have undesirable genes (being black or autistic), and then decide to get the abortion for that reason.
Not only is this hateful, denying births to a protected minority group because they're part of said minority group is eugenics. This has been practiced by governments before as racial eugenics. It's no different if it's practiced by individuals. The point of it being bad isn't "the government is doing it", the point of it is that eugenics is bad.
I think we need to talk about this because as leftists, we lean towards pro-choice arguments because our goal is social justice. Pro-choice arguments generally talk about situations where the pregnancy was always unwanted, and that's good, but we need to talk about situations where it was wanted from the beginning and then changed because of hate.
Now before anyone says it: No, abortion is not eugenics. Pro-lifers, fuck off. Don't use this to support your beliefs.
Another thing I see a lot of pro-choicers say is that "It isn't eugenics because it isn't being forced by the government / It is not a coordinated attempt by the state to wipe out an entire group"
Eugenics is neither of those things. A coordinated attempt to wipe out a protected class is genocide. Eugenics is an ideology. Think of it like fascism. Just like fascism, it started in Europe. It spread about in the UK and got us posters like these, supporting the idea of not having 'mentally defective' children (it then changed to be about race too).
This did lead to genocidal policies in the United States, where the US forced sterilizations on disabled people and enacted similar policies, but it also had general hateful policies like the Immigration Act of 1924, which barred immigrants based on race. Eventually, Nazi Germany picked it up but even then, it wasn't used to justify killing entire groups until later. At first, it was just about denying births to protected classes because they were deemed flawed, such as preventing births of disabled people and ethnic minorities. (It should also be mentioned that eugenics used to be about superiority and aborting fetuses just because they're 'unfit', but in modern times that is not always the case)
Why am I mentioning this? Because it seems like a lot of people have flawed perceptions on what eugenics is, and that's really bad because it leads to people accidentally supporting eugenics by claiming what they're supporting isn't eugenics.
I have seen a lot of people say this isn't a form of eugenics because it's being done by an individual and not the state. Well, the thing about that is eugenics was advertised as an individual choice, as a self directed thing. This is not to mention eugenics is an ideology, and ideologies can be practiced by anyone.
Lastly, I want to state that this is not about the fetus. This is about eugenics being bad, and that we shouldn't normalize it in leftist circles. We can't say we're fighting for social justice when we're normalizing eugenics talk. This is about minority groups. We can be pro-choice and anti-eugenics at the same time. But I feel like for a lot of people, they refuse to see what has been practiced as eugenics on a state level as eugenics when it's practiced by an individual. And for others, they hold "Women have the right to choose no matter what" so strongly that they're willing to put minority groups in the line of fire just to get that point across.
This is not okay, no matter what. This is not okay. This only goes to make us look bad. I've seen so many pro-lifers using this against us and I am tired of it. Stop giving them ammunition.
Being a endogenic plural means being scared to make online friends who might secretly be anti's
Based. People who spread miss information should be scared of making freinds on the internet.
laughable.
[image description: screenshot of rules 12 and 13 from some forum or website, presumably for discussion of 'narcissistic abuse'. text reads as follows.
12: Narcissists are not allowed to post or comment here. // If you have been diagnosed with NPD or self-identify as a narcissist, you are not allowed to participate in RBN/LAN. Furthermore, do not promote the work of narcissists here, such as Sam Vaknin.
13. No generalizing about groups of people. // This includes race, religion, profession, gender, political party, age, ethnicity, etc. /end description]
#"there's only two things I can't stand in this world: people who are intolerant of other cultures and the dutch” (via @luimnigh)
If I’m wrong that’s cool but isn’t this literally from r/raisedbynarcissists and this is like entirely reasonable for the forum jfc
attributing the abuse that parents are able to inflict on their children due to the structural power of the nuclear family on the nebulous category of a "personality disorder" is ableist. Not to mention, if you have abusive parents you are more likely to be diagnosed with a PD. This doesn't help anyone.
Plus personalities are partly socially constructed so people don't have to admit neurotypicals are shitty. Neirotypicals are the most violent and controlling neurotype.
Lesbian separatism is rooted in the hatred of men rather than the love of women, and that shines through in many of yalls beliefs. Lesbian separatism has done so much damage to our community. You all need to learn and grow out of this harmful ideology and become a community where we love and care for one another.
