#mra logic

[theconcealedweapon]

This is proof that antifeminists never actually listen to feminists. They just assume that feminists would always take the most anti-male stance on anything.

The teenage girl who's dating a much older man is being preyed on. The teenage boy who's joining the military is also being preyed on.

[realmisandrists]

A woman chooses the bear. Men are offended.

A man stockpiles guns because he fantasizes about the opportunity to shoot his daughter's boyfriend. Those same men support him.

Those men consider it okay to generalize men, even to the point of threatening their lives, as long as it's men doing it to uphold their power and to treat women like property. But when women try to keep themselves safe, that's when those men suddenly decide to be offended.

[thinkabtthis]

Women with opinions are witches. Women with opinions are feminazis. Women with opinions are TERFs.

~block and stay safe uwu

[aeternalswirlingfight]

When entitled MRAs with low IQs (was it so hard to find out I was a feminist when I write it in every single social page I own? LOL) cry male tears if you call them out on their sexist (do you call men ‘doll’ or ‘hun’ in ‘friendly terms’ too, f*boy? DIDN’T THINK SO), creepy (sending me my own pics from DeviantArt level) and on the whole inappropiate behaviour.  Another day in the life.

Also, it’s pretty hilarious how I’m supposed to feel bad because he ‘hates the radical feminism type’ and he blocked me. Like, good riddance? xD

[realmisandrists]

Woman: "I don't trust men because they do this."

Man: "There's nothing wrong with what I did because all men do it."

Both the man and the woman are generalizing that men do something. The difference is that the woman is trying to stop it while the man is trying to justify it.

If you find yourself being offended by the woman and not by the man, then you're admitting that generalizing men as doing something sexist isn't what bothers you. What bothers you is the expectation that men stop.

[realmisandrists]

I saw a video in which a man told a woman that she needs to lower her standards because otherwise she'll be 35 and alone. He said that no man will want her because they'll all want women who are much younger.

He literally generalized all men as being predators.

Women are not generalizing men. Women are only being hesitant around men in order to stay safe. But gross men? They're the ones projecting their grossness on all men. They're the ones downright demanding that women believe all men are just as bad in order to stop those women from finding better.

[theconcealedweapon]

"But men are more likely to be homeless, more likely to die at work, and more likely to be drafted into war."

So, you want housing to be a human right and an end to hoarding housing for profit? You want better working conditions and for bosses to be held accountable when an employee is injured on the job? You want an end to war?

Or do you want all of those problems to continue and you only use them as a "gotcha" against feminists?

[realmisandrists]

Pay attention to who gets classified as misandrists.

Landlords who hoard houses and cops who criminalize homelessness are not classified as misandrists, even though homelessness is listed as an example of misandry.

CEOs who prioritize profit over worker safety are not classified as misandrists, even though workplace death is listed as an example of misandry.

Politicians who create wars are not classified as misandrists, even though combat death is listed as an example of misandry.

Parents who consider their children to be property are not classified as misandrists, even though circumcision is listed as an example of misandry.

Even overprotective fathers who stockpile guns and fantasize about the opportunity to shoot teenage boys are not classified as misandrists.

They list so many problems as examples of misandry. But they reserve the "misandrist" label for women who choose the bear instead of for the actual source of those problems.