#no nets

[cemetery-driven]

losing lungs

[nonswsharkcull]

Ocean Care Day

Source: Fin Free Sydney

[nonswsharkcull]

Breaking news - This morning it was announced that a further $250,000 would be spent on Aerial and on water surveillance and also tagging programs and education smile emoticon Sadly Mike Baird is also considering shark nets too - He doesn't seem to realise that shark nets = shark cull. Below is the article http://www.abc.net.au/…/nsw-mayor-claims-win-amid-s…/6695164

[nonswsharkcull]

[nonswsharkcull]

Australasian Science magazine online is an independent source of news and commentary on scientific developments. Each month scientists and science journalists write about the latest research in plain language and offer opinions and analysis of topical scientific issues

Excerpt taken from the Australiasin Science Magazine "Does culling work? So often the argument in favour of a cull comes down to the emotional question of who is more important: a human or a shark. Rather, we need to ask the question, will culling sharks actually reduce the risk of an attack?

The answer is no. In fact, when shark culling was carried out in Hawaii, between 1959 to 1976, over 4,500 sharks were killed and yet there was no significant decrease in the number of shark bites recorded.

Culling has been the primary shark mitigation policy of the New South Wales Government for over 60 years, through the use of “shark” nets. But a report by the Department of Primary Industries showed that 24 of the 38 (63%) attacks in the state, between 1937 and 2008, occurred at netted beaches.

Pre-emptively killing sharks is a response based on emotion rather than of scientific data."