take this as an invite for your rant on odesta construing safety? 👀
odesta construing safety…
I think the thing about it that gets to me. like truly gets to me. is that they’re not safe. they’re never once safe. precanon, they are surveilled constantly, even in their own home, and Finnick is basically living a double life (not by choice). in canon, they are both used as pawns and have to very consciously manipulate the narrative around them, as well as use what’s been most likely a dream that’s just for them (and their relationship previously being the only private thing either of them have) as a very public propaganda tool in a war machine. they never get the chance for privacy together. they never get the chance to enjoy a feeling of true safety. so they have to make safety with each other. I think that’s so sweet and such a powerful concept, and I think they construe it in terms of the physical and emotional, but from the angle of defending each other from external factors and the rest of the world, which we see a little bit with the way Finnick reacts in the cafeteria scene.
in terms of the physical, I think they’re both reliant on their physicality, but they have most likely got a lot of trauma around that due to killing people. at the same time, even though it seems counterintuitive, I think having that knowledge of what the other person is capable of physically settles them and makes them both feel safer. I hc that before they even get together, if they’re sleeping in the same room (casual sleepover as friends do) Annie will sleep on the floor in front of the door, so she’ll wake up if anyone comes in, and even though obvs nobody’s going to come in, it really shifts Finnick’s perception of her. I think she also sleeps between him and the door (if applicable) once they get together.
in terms of emotional safety, I think it’s less that they construe safety to be openness and the ability to confide in each other, because again, we know the victors’ houses are bugged. they can’t fully confide in each other. but I think they both defend and support each other emotionally in other ways, and primarily it’s through supportive continuity. obviously Finnick is a great support to Annie as her caretaker, and having that in a nonjudgmental and unconditional way makes an enormous impact, but I think she feels safe with him emotionally not because of that, but because he shows how dedicated he is to caring for her and protecting her. on Finnick’s side, I think Annie goes to bat for him a lot. there’s no way he’s not getting flak for how he’s perceived to treat her (because who’s going to know about the trafficking. it looks like he’s caring for her and then immediately going and sleeping with a bunch of other people) and I think while maybe she doesn’t always defend him aggressively, because maybe he doesn’t want that, the fact that she simply ignores it all and continues to be with him is very meaningful to him. with that continued presence, I think it both makes them secure and comfortable with each other, and that in turn makes them feel safe.
I just think it’s very interesting that their sense of safety most likely isn’t found in openness with each other, but is instead constructed defensively and as a clear reaction to constant surveillance and pressure. they don’t have a concept of safety that’s reacting logically to or even that influenced by their surroundings, they have an “us against the world” mentality and are carving out moments of peace despite always being on high alert.











