An especially engaging discussion for people interested in both the abortion debate and true crime content.
"Interview with Dr. Christina Francis regarding the case of Tierra Walker
Key Takeaways
Tierra Walker’s death reflects repeated failures in basic medical care and coordination.
Standard protocols for managing severe hypertension and preeclampsia exist and should have prevented discharge at 20 weeks.
Improving maternal outcomes should be a shared goal across abortion disagreements, with many avenues for common ground.
...ProPublica focuses on whether and when doctors should suggest abortion, but is less detailed about non-abortion standards of care."
I've said this over and over and over and OVER again for the past five years: ABORTION LAW HAS LITTLE, IF ANY, EFFECT ON MATERNAL MORTALITY. So long as abortion restrictions make room for medical procedures that end a pregnancy before viability and other similar scenerios, obstetric care is usually unaffected.
So why do pro-abortion publications regularly ignore or straight up lie about specialist maternal care? If they care so much about pregnant women, why are they conflating obstetrics with elective abortion? Why are they not highlighting medical neglect - a common killer of pregnant women ALL AROUND the US, regardless of abortion law? ProPublica and other similar outlets lack the integrity to accurately report on something that has been a problem well before Roe was overturned. I'm so damn tired.












