So I have a question (This is really long, sorry)
If a person has a life threatening growth, you’d have it removed. No one would argue against the surgery if it would save the patient’s life and the only way to do so was to remove the growth. Now replace “patient” with “young mother” and “growth” with “baby”. Suddenly we’re talking about abortion. We’ve humanized the growth and brought religious rules down upon us. It amazes me that in today’s world, a teacher for once didn’t have an answer to a relevant question asked in his class. The question posed was; “if the baby is the reason the mother is going to die, as in, the mother was particularly weak or something, and the strain of growing a life inside her was going to kill her, would the catholic church allow her to abort the baby without excommunicating her?”. And to my amazement my teacher stared at me like a deer in headlights, before putting on a thoughtful expression and telling me I should ask the bishop in our town.
Now I’m not religious, I was just asking a question, trying to get a better understanding of a rule I was just taught. And I still don’t have an answer. So I’ve decided to ask the people on here.
If the rule for catholic churches is “no abortions with no exceptions, however there is the Doctrine of double effect”, which is to say “There are times when an abortion may occur. E.g. when a woman is sick and requires an operation, but in the process of operating on her the baby is lost.”
Then my question is this; If the baby is the cause of the problem, if the baby is the only cause of the problem, and there is no other way to save the mother without aborting the baby, would the catholic church allow for the baby to be aborted without excommunicating the mother? (This is all under the assumption the mother is a devout catholic etc)