they do this everytime
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from Malaysia
seen from Honduras
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from China
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Canada
they do this everytime
Disco Elysium skill talk! Mostly featuring Electrochemistry
The Rethoric - Conceptualization dialogues:
Conceptualization: Is there a way to express how incredible the alfajor is?
Rethoric: The best alfajor is clearly the Guaymallén. The people's alfajor.
Far too much debate today is more like a play of competing monologues, or forms of self-promotion designed to perform for one’s tribe. Shoul
Much debate today more resembles an alternation of competing monologues, forms of self-promotion designed to play-up to one’s tribe of the “already convinced”, gratuitous appeals to one’s base, rather than expressions of genuine responsiveness.
Two years ago.
One of my country's politicans starts a speech against another polotican: "When do you mean to cease abusing our patience? How long...?"
Me, completely shook:
some empathy drawings. honestly just wanted to draw him pissed
Huh
Listening to Prattchets Hogfather and thinking about the concept of Death having a grandkid. About six hours in I only started wondering about Death having a "kid".
I'm new to the Discworld and have only listened to one other book up until now, but it made me think how that is actually a pretty neat way to guide other people's minds; the "kid" of Death would raise a LOT of questions I guess, if you only went to write about it as lf it was normal. But if you throw in a grandchild and explain how they came to be you're basically avoiding to explain the kid's existence and implement it as a completely normal thing in your readers view.
Not sure how to phrase it, but it's like saying two weird things and only explaining the send, taking your listeners focus away from the first so completely that it is established as "normal".
Maybe comparable to "normal and cishetero people living in polyamouros relationships", which establishes every queer person as "normal" and would be questioned instantly, but the moment you throw in the "polyamorous relationships" the focus is set on that and the other thing is overlooked and forgotten.
Could be used as a rethoric (?) tool. Needs more thinking on my side. Seems like a cool thing, though.
What is advertising?
I do not regard advertising as entertainment or an art form, but as a medium of information. When I write an advertisement, I don’t want you to tell me that you find it ‘creative.’ I want you to find it so interesting that you buy the product. When Aeschines spoke, they said, ‘How well he speaks.’ But when Demosthenes spoke, they said, ‘Let us march against Philip.’
—David Ogilvy, Ogilvy on Advertising (1983)