Found today -- Notice that Sinwar's bodyguard - Hani Zourab - is an UNWRA teacher from -- Ramallah -- with an Egyptian passport. UNWRA !!!! The UN (UNWRA) is in league with Hamas, and the UN should be defunded.
Only Yarden Bibas being released and neither he nor us knowing the status of Shiri and his two sons is another kind of evil. If you don’t think this, then I don’t know what the fuck kind of world you’re living in. This is psychological torture of the highest degree.
And if Shiri and their two little ones don’t survive, I will never forgive you.
Margaret Thatcher: A country can't support terrorism and still expect to be treated as a member of the international community. To take hostages is to exclude yourself from the civilized world.
Keir Starmer: I state clearly that the United Kingdom formally recognises the state of Palestine.
==
The absolute collapse of the UK's moral integrity is staggering.
And why ‘pro Palestinians’ won’t be happy at this peace deal: they want the eradication of Israel
By: Nicole Lampert
Published: Oct 9, 2025
Happy news today of a new ceasefire will not erase the horror of the past two years. The celebrations of the massacre of Jews. The murders and lies, lies, lies. This is how they started:
On October 7 2023, even as Hamas was still rampaging its way around Southern Israel, murdering, raping and taking civilians as hostages, in the UK, plans were already afoot to come out in support of the attacks.
Radical preacher Haitham al-Hadded, later described by the BBC as a ‘highly respected imam’ and a favourite in UK mosques, put out a video on YouTube saying of the fighters: ‘We urge you to stay updated with the news and think of various ways to support them, whether politically or through lobbying and media exposure. Be prepared for mass demonstrations to support them.’
Those mass demonstrations were already being organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign with the Met Police logging the first request for a national demonstration against Israel on October 7 at 12.50pm. On October 9 they had their first demonstration and a few days later their first march. Separately, MPs were being lobbied on mass to push for the government to ‘immediately withdraw UK financial and military aid from Israel’.
Unofficial large demonstrations, including outside the Israeli Embassy in Kensington, started the night of October 7. Elsewhere in the country, in areas with large Muslim populations, fireworks were set off.
The Hamas massacre launched, according to figures released by the Community Security Trust, the most significant wave of antisemitic hatred in decades. There was a record spike on October 7 and 8; something the former Jihadist turned anti-extremist Hussein Abubakr Mansour later described as a way of people participating ‘symbolically in the pogrom’.
By October 10, university towns were papered in pro-Palestine posters put out by the Socialist Workers Party. One, in Manchester, featured a Palestinian holding a weapon and said ‘Victory to the Palestinians: Why It’s Right to Resist Israel’. It advertised a public meeting at the nearby Quaker’s Friends Meeting House. The church group, which is meant to be pacifist, later cancelled the meeting under public pressure.
Meanwhile, Muslims such as anti-extremist expert Ghaffar Hussain found that on his social media accounts, he was suddenly being sent content of pro-terror material. He believes it is because he has a Muslim-sounding name.
‘Immediately after October 7 my social media feeds were inundated with pro-Hamas content that was promoting and endorsing terrorism. I can imagine how that would have a radicalising effect on those susceptible to hate narratives.
‘All loss of life in a war is tragic but often is framed in a way that suggests all Jewish people are complicit. In this way, social media platforms are actively formenting this unrest.’
If it felt like there was a pro-Hamas campaign ready and waiting for the October 7 attacks, that was because it was. And for the last two years, including on the anniversary of the October 7 massacre, we have seen those libels become every more shrill. And they are repeated and repeated and repeated.
The Israeli PR campaign has been risible in its efforts to defeat the lies, but when you look at what is stacked against it, how long this propaganda war has been prepared for, it is hardly surprising.
For centuries ,both the European and Arab worlds have been fed a diet of hatred against Jews. In Europe this started with religious idea of Jews killing Jesus and then came the invention in the Middle Ages in England of the blood libel: the idea that Jews want to kill Christian children. In the Middle East, separately, Jews, like Christians, were ‘other’. They were to be treated as second class citizens, dhimmis, who had to pay special taxes for their own protection.
Nazi ideology helped bring the antisemitism of those two worlds together. The genocide claim, which permeates social media, universities, the BBC, was one started by the Nazis – even as they were committing genocide against Jews.
‘The idea of Jews wanting to commit genocide against Muslims first appeared in Nazi propaganda for the Arab world,’ says Dr Daniel Allington, a King’s College London expert on extremism who wrote the recently published Counter Extremism Group paper, Islamist Antisemitism: A Neglected Hate. ‘The Nazis wanted to get the Arabs on side, and working with the Mufti in Palestine, he broadcast this idea throughout the Middle East. Even as the Holocaust was going on, the Nazis and their Arab collaborators were promoting the idea that the Jews were going to carry kill all of the Arabs. When people today echo that idea of genocide, they may not realise it, but they are repeating Nazi propaganda.’
The idea continued to take hold within the Middle East as Israel beat back Arab armies and created a state in 1948. The genocide libel was picked up by the Soviets in the 1950s and 1960s: they saw how antisemitism could be a disruptor within the West. While the Holocaust officially meant the discrediting of Nazi style antisemitism, the Soviets saw how it could used as long as it was given a different name: antizionism.
Former Israeli MP and expert in contemporary antisemitism, Dr Einat Wilf, says much of the antizionist style antisemitism we see in the UK is the result of Soviet propaganda which has been disseminated in Western leftist circles for decades.
‘It’s called the placard strategy – you see it on placards. It is basically based on the simple equation of Israel with every evil word it rests on. So imperialism, colonialism, apartheid, racism, ethnic cleansing, genocide, Nazism. These words are chosen not because they bear any relationship to reality but because they are essentially associated with evil.
‘The placard strategy works with a continuous equation of these evil words with Zionism. Sometimes they will just have a star of David. Recently I listened to a talk by a former Soviet operative who was an expert in mass manipulation and he explained what we are seeing right now.
‘Number one, he said, is simple messages. The equation of Israel with all these evil ideas, is simple. Visual symbols, the placards. Then he said, repetition. We see that all the time, repetition is key. And finally, and this is fundamental, he said, prestige paralyses judgement. This is an insight that every Madison Avenue marketing executive knows: a celebrity tells you to buy something, you buy it, so prestige paralyses judgement. Now, what the Soviets did is essentially use institutions of prestige like the UN and human rights NGOs and universities by inserting those ideas into them.
‘So the first and most successful is Zionism equals racism – a phrase passed by the UN shortly after the UN voted that racism is bad. Once it was understood that racism is bad, then the next step was to equate it with Zionism.
‘The red green alliance – the alliance of Islamists and Soviets - began in the Sixties and Seventies to work together to have an automatic majority in the UN General Assembly. Abba Eban, our once legendary ambassador to the UN, said that if Algeria were to bring a resolution to the UN General Assembly that the earth is flat and that Israel had flattened it, it would be passed by a majority of 146 states against 13 with 26 abstentions and those are pretty much still the same proportions.’
Israeli officials call the way Hamas propaganda is disseminated ‘UN washing’. Hamas claims how many people have been killed by the IDF (never saying whether or not they were militants). The UN then repeats the claim. It is then disseminated by news organisations around the world such as the BBC. The UN imprimatur gives the propaganda the ‘prestige’ title. Because the UN is a good thing, isn’t it?
But it is not just the UN. This red green propaganda has been disseminated for decades through universities, which are now educating the people who run the country, the media, and the establishment. All of them, whether they know it or not, have been soaked in anti-Western propaganda, which has been focused on hatred of Israel.
Einat worries about just how far the placard propaganda is now going post October 7. ‘There are now placards about how the world has to be cleaned up with the star of David put in a dustbin. Society is going through a mass psychosis which is once again calling for the elimination of the Jews.’ (I am planning to put out the audio of my interview with Einat in the next few days on here because what she had to say was so fascinating).
In the lead up to October 7 we saw these separate movements: Nazis, Soviets, Islamists, Western social media algorithms, and – to a lesser but growing extent, the far right - work separately and together because antisemitism is the great connector. Which is why opposing groups are willing to overlook their differences on this.
Sunni and Shia Muslims go to war against each other but extremists in both camps are determined to wipe out Israel: for the Shias the destruction of Israel will fulfil a messianic prophecy of the return of the 12th prophet. For the Sunni Islamists, of which the Muslim Brotherhood is a big part, Jews should have no power over what is deemed part of the caliphate lands. Both groups see the destruction of Jews as the path to utopia.
They aren’t the only ones. In the West, with Marxism in the doldrums, the far left latched onto Islamic antisemitism as a way to create the revolution they still crave, and part of that was led by UK groups.
In 1994, a Socialist Workers Party Committee member called Chris Harmen wrote an influential booklet called The Prophet and the Proletariat. Based on the Trotskyist idea of creating broad coalitions, it argued that socialists in the UK should work with Islamists because both were against Western imperialism. ‘He said these guys are really good at fighting imperial powers and if we work with them, the younger members of the Islamist movements will see that revolutionary socialism is right and join us,’ says David Toube, an expert in antisemitic extremism.
In the UK, working alongside the SWP, we see the Muslim Brotherhood. An organisation banned in many Muslim and European countries, the UK is – extraordinarily – one of its global hubs. Hamas is a Muslim Brotherhood organisation.
Lord Walney, a former Labour MP, is the government’s former advisor on political violence and disruption, and has been working on this extremism for years. His work for the government has been ignored for too long. He hopes that the murder of Jews on the streets of Britain and the increasing violence of the pro-Palestine demonstrations will finally force the government to wake up to the huge undercurrent of issues driving this antisemitic campaign.
‘You can see from the silence or even potential hostility from these voices towards the idea of a ceasefire of this so-called genocide that people don’t actually want it to end,’ he says. ‘What is extraordinary is how this movement has percolated through society. I saw it through my work with trade unions, and now being pro-Palestine has become a cloak of the left: you have to wear it to be a good person.
‘You see it in the arts, in the ‘gardeners for Palestine’. To be accepted in society, you have to agree with the Palestinian cuase. The actions of journalists such as in the BBC where they appear more likely to trust Hamas figures than IDF ones shows just how mainstream this is. The UN is looked at as a romantic democratic institution, but the fact that so many of its employees took part in the October 7 [the UN fired nine employees for taking part in the October 7 massacre] should have finished it off.
‘There needs to be a fundamental reset and look at how we have got here. In Britain, we need to turn over a new page. We need to recognise the pernicious effect of the Muslim Brotherhood. We need the Charity Commission to investigate faster, where our money is going. Most of all, there needs to be a political commitment to talk about what is going wrong.
‘We have many bad actors in respectable positions. I want where we are now to be a turning point and for people to recognise the problems.’
==
And people wonder how the Germans got radicalized by the Nazis in the 1930s.
I have asked at least five pro-"Palestine" people on social media if they support the peace deal. I could not get a single one of them to say either yes or no. They can't say yes, because it's not true since Israel didn't lose and hasn't been erased. And they can't say no because it gives the game away. The more people die, the more propaganda they can generate and the larger the cudgel against Israel they can wield.
It was never about the "innocent civilians." It was always about trying to destroy Israel and the Jews by any and every means available, including manipulation and propaganda.
It's worth remembering that Hamas could have met the same terms of this deal - give back the hostages, disarm and leave - 2 years and 68,000 Gazans ago.
Finally, don't miss how the first Tweet talks about "what Palestinians started on Oct 7th"? Remember back when they were saying that Hamas ≠ "Palestinians" and it was wrong to attribute to "Palestinians" what Hamas terrorists had done? Now they're no longer pretending there's a difference. And neither should we. Always believe them when they tell you who they are.
