Nanase Haruka from Free! is an autistic gay princecoric chlorinegender salvian boyflux person who uses they/them, cae/caer, and it/its pronouns! It still questions itself constantly, but it’s starting to feel more comfortable with its identity. Cae’s in a relationship with Yamazaki Sousuke, a gay nachtesian acidgender gendercute bungender person with anxiety who uses he/him, pup/pups, and bun/buns pronouns!
Salvian and a couple imperial soldiers were headed to Solitude with a prisoner when they were ambushed by some stormcloaks. They requested he stand down and release the man, to which Salvian quickly drew his sword and put it against one of the stormcloaks necks. This didn't phase them at all. In fact they warned him to hand over the prisoner or he would pay. Salvian laughed not knowing there were more stormcloaks hidden nearby. They all faught hard, but it did not end well for Salvian. The prisoner was told he would pay for his crimes and that prisoner happened to be Angof. The imperials who reported Salvian's death claimed that he was the one who killed him, but it was actually one of his own men.
@avaleon sorry I don't have anything proper, but this is basically what happened. 😊
OK right so Salvian was a fifth century Christian writer who was born in Cologne-ish and travelled round Lyons and Marseilles and wrote this enormous work called "On the government of God" which is his attempt to find a theodicy for why the Roman Empire was falling to bits.Which, in prophetic style, he blames on the sins of the Roman authorities themselves. Obviously, this means that there is a clear and obvious bias in how he presents and selects his material - but, because he's interested in talking about their exactions and effects, it's one of the few texts we have which is directly interested in what life was like for the Roman poor - he's also remarkably sympathetic to 'heretics' and barbarians, which is unusual.
You can find all eight books in excellent English translation here: I'm just going to quote some things.
Under the cut: Salvian on the barbarians' 'heresy'; Salvian on unequal taxation of rich and poor; Salvian on land-grabbing; Salvian on the false appearance of charity; Salvian argues that Romans are going over to the barbarians due to their unfair treatment by the powerful and the state.
5.3 [on heresy - the Goths in particular were Arians, which meant they believed that Jesus was partially divine and like God but not fully identical with God] "Indeed it is only among us that they are heretics, and not among themselves, for they are so sure of their own orthodoxy that they libel us in turn by the accusation of heresy. As they are to us, so are we to them. We are convinced that they injure the holy incarnation in calling the Son inferior to the Father: they think that we do injury to the Father in believing the two equal. The truth is on our side, but they claim it for theirs. We truly honor God but they think their belief honors his divinity the more. They fall short in their Christian duty, but through what they think its fullest performance; their lack of reverence seems to them true piety. So they err, but with the best intentions, not through hatred, but through love of God, believing that they honor and love him. Although they have not the true faith, yet they think they possess the perfect love of God. How they shall be punished for the error of their false opinion on the day of judgment, none can know but the Judge. In the meantime, God bears with them patiently, I think, for he sees that though they have not the true faith, yet their error is due to the love of what appears to be the truth, especially since he knows that their wrongdoing is due to ignorance, while among us men neglect what they believe."
5.7 [unequal taxation of rich and poor, and how it works] The rich themselves from time to time make additions to the amount of taxation demanded from the poor. You may ask how it is, when their assessment has already reached a maximum figure, and the payments due from them are very large, that the rich can possibly wish to increase the total. But I did not say that they increase their own payments, for they permit the increase simply because it does not cost them anything additional.
Let me explain. Frequently there come from the highest imperial officials new envoys, new bearers of dispatches, sent under recommendation to a few men of note, for the ruin of the many. In their honor new contributions and tax levies are decreed. The mighty determine what sums the poor shall pay; the favor of the rich decrees what the masses of the lowly shall lose; for they themselves are not at all involved in these exactions....
The poor, indeed, in the extremes of their misery, pay all the exactions of which I have spoken, in utter ignorance of the object or reason of the payments. For who is allowed to discuss the payments, or inquire into the reasons for the amounts due? The sum is openly published only when the rich fall out with one another, and some of them feel slighted because they learn that assessments have been passed without their advice and management. Then you will hear some among them say: "What an unconscionable crime! Two or three decide the ruin of the many; a few powerful men determine what is to be paid for by many poor wretches!" For each individual rich man thinks it due to his honor to object to any decree passed in his absence, but he does not consider it due to justice to object to any wrong being enacted in his presence.
Finally, what they have criticized in others they themselves afterward establish in law, either in requital for the earlier contempt, or as proof of their power. As a result the most unhappy poor are like men far out at sea, buffeted by conflicting winds; they are overwhelmed by the billows that break over them now from one side, now from the other.
But surely, you say, those who are unjust in this respect are known to be moderate and just in another, and atone for the wickedness in the one matter by their generosity in the other. For in proportion as they burden the poor with the weight of new indictions they sustain them by proffering new alleviations; in proportion as the lesser men are weighed down by new tributes, they are relieved by new remedies.
But this is not the case, for the injustice is alike in both the exactions and the remedies. As the poor are the first to receive the burden, they are the last to obtain relief. For whenever, as happened lately, the ruling powers have thought best to take measures to help the bankrupt cities to lessen their taxes in some measure, at once we see the rich alone dividing with one another the remedy granted to all alike. Who then remembers the poor? Who summons the needy and humble to share in the common benefit? Who allows the man who is always first in bearing the burden to have even the last place in receiving relief? What more can I say? Only that the poor are not reckoned as taxpayers at all, except when the weight of taxation is being imposed on them; they are outside the number when remedies are being distributed.
Under such circumstances can we think ourselves undeserving of God's severe punishment when we ourselves continually so punish the poor?
5.5 [exactions of magistrates lead Romans to flee to the 'barbarians']
Meanwhile the poor are being robbed, widows groan, orphans are trodden down, so that many, even persons of good birth, who have enjoyed a liberal education, seek refuge with the enemy to escape death under the trials of the general persecution. They seek among the barbarians the Roman mercy, since they cannot endure the barbarous mercilessness they find among the Romans.
Although these men differ in customs and language from those with whom they have taken refuge, and are unaccustomed too, if I may say so, to the nauseous odor of the bodies and clothing of the barbarians, yet they prefer the strange life they find there to the injustice rife among the Romans. So you find men passing over everywhere, now to the Goths, now to the Bagaudae, or whatever other barbarians have established their power anywhere, and they do not repent of their expatriation, for they would rather live as free men, though in seeming captivity, than as captives in seeming liberty. Hence the name of Roman citizen, once not only much valued but dearly bought,is now voluntarily repudiated and shunned, and is thought not merely valueless, but even almost abhorrent. What can be a greater proof of Roman injustice than that many worthy noblemen to whom their Roman status should have been the greatest source of fame and honor, have nevertheless been driven so far by the cruelty of Roman injustice that they no longer wish to be Romans?
The result is that even those who do not take refuge with the barbarians are yet compelled to be barbarians themselves; for this is the case with the greater part of the Spaniards, no small proportion of the Gauls, and, in fine, all those throughout the Roman world whose Roman citizenship has been brought to nothing by Roman extortion.
