#savitri devi

[rogue762mm]

[ssjkamui-digitalphoenixug]

Reconciling Nick Land and Alexander Dugin: Part Two

Right vs. Left: tradition, destruction, and revolutionary ecstasy

Michael Kumpmann examines the divide between the right-hand and left-hand paths through Evola, Dugin, and esoteric thought, linking warrior archetypes, carnival revolts, and technocommercialism to the deeper struggle between preservation and destruction.

What, then, are the Path of the Right Hand and the Path of the Left Hand?

In principle, the Path of the Right Hand means building and preserving, while the Path of the Left Hand means destruction. But what does that really mean?

The difference is easy to grasp. Let us first look at how the term “right” is used. In many languages, “right” is synonymous with “correct” but also with “law.”

For example, samurai texts such as the Hagakure or The Book of Five Rings are considered “right,” whereas the Kama Sutra is seen as a religiously “left” text.

Evola described the Path of the Right Hand as represented by man as warrior and woman as mother, while on the Path of the Left Hand he located, on the male side, Gnosticism (that is, the questioning of conventional reality),1 sexual magic, and entheogenic drugs.

At this point, an obvious question arises for many: man as warrior and woman as mother are right-hand ideas, while the notions of sex, drugs, and rock and roll are religiously left-hand ideas. Does this not, in a sense, resemble the graphical representation of the political spectrum? On the right side we find, so to speak, fascism, and on the left side the hippies.

Yes, there are overlaps nonetheless. The warrior also stands close to the archetype of the hero. And as we all know from right-wing theory, he is sovereign who controls the state of exception. Yet one could also describe the hero as someone who, in the exceptional situation, restores order and control, thus mastering the state of exception. That Carl Schmitt is essentially the archetypal right-wing thinker, and that for him politics begins with the designation of an enemy, fits perfectly with the warrior. And on the other side, everyone knows the left’s fondness for sex and drugs. This was the case even before the hippies. Take, for instance, Charles Fourier, but also leftist philosophers such as Wilhelm Reich and Georges Bataille, who are of great interest in this regard. To some extent, Deleuze and Guattari also fit here, with their schizoanalysis and the dissolution of the ego through desire. Evola’s “left-hand” Gnostic, who has “awakened” from sleep and illusion and now finally sees reality, also bears a superficial resemblance to the modern term “woke.”

In Templars of the Proletariat, Dugin examines in detail the comparison between the political left and the religious left. He outlines a genealogy in which he traces the revolutionary left back to heretical Russian Orthodox sects. He then describes the political left as a search for a “revolutionary ecstasy” (an ecstasy that sweeps away rules and existing orders), which could manifest itself in political revolution and in “political riots.” This particular revolutionary ecstasy, he argues, is what links the political left with the Path of the Left Hand and with the idea of the apocalypse. (Including hippies and certain old 1968ers.)2 It should also be noted here that Jonathan Pageau associates carnival with postmodernism, the left, and also with the apocalypse.3 And carnival itself is based on the bacchanalia, which in turn are connected to the Dionysian cult of ancient Greece, one of the first cults of the Left-Hand Path in the West. In the Rhineland carnival there is a formalized ritual in which the “jecken” fools (clothed in rags and tatters) are imagined to overrun the city, seize control, and establish a “council.” The parallels with the political left, communism, and carnival are immediately striking. Certain actions by Donald Trump’s supporters, such as the “storming of the Capitol” on January 6 (in which some were even costumed), also carried a “carnivalesque” element. (And many alt-righters adopt the Joker as a personal symbol, who in the Batman comics is famous for regularly overrunning the city with a horde of “clowns.”)

1

It must be noted here that this is associated with the wise old man, but in Jungian teaching also with the (court) jester, since seemingly opposing archetypes can be reduced to the same basic pattern. A good humorist or jester also exposes logical contradictions and unmasks things that people believe even though they cannot be logically true. Or he reveals implications people have not considered. And the archetype of the trickster/fool serves in Jung’s view to tear off someone’s mask and reveal the hidden truth beneath it.

2

See also: Apocalypse as Praxis.

3

Carnival Has Taken Over the World | Benjamin Boyce & Jonathan Pageau, The Anti-Christ and Carnivals (Jonathan Pageau, David Gornoski), The Symbolism of Halloween, The Metaphysics of Clown World, Kanye West — Jesus is King | The Fool and the Inversion, Lindt LINDOR | Verschenke Glücksmomente | Präsente | 20s.

4

Comic artist Alex Ross wrote in 1997 a Nietzsche-inspired Marvel comic series titled Earth X in which he commented on many Marvel heroes. For instance, he suggested that the name “Brotherhood of Evil Mutants” in X-Men was deliberately adopted by Magneto so that his enemy Professor Xavier would be seen as “the good one” and would ultimately be broken by that ideal.

Interestingly, Ross altered the figure of Captain Britain in such a way that Merlin gives him the magical power of creation and preservation on the one hand and destruction on the other. He rejects destruction and chooses creation and preservation. A few panels later it is said that Captain Britain failed and died because he made the mistake of thinking he had to choose between the two. The correct answer would have been to take both. This strongly recalls lightning and sun.

Reconciling Nick Land and Alexander Dugin: Part Two

Right vs. Left: tradition, destruction, and revolutionary ecstasy

[guy60660]

Aten | Savitri Devi

[father-of-the-void]

Creation and destruction are one to the eyes who can see beauty.

— Savitri Devi

[nikolasongsa]

Creation and destruction are one, to the eyes who can see beauty.

Savitri Devi

[autisticsupervillain]

It's Complete Monster Friday!

Today's Complete Monster of the Week: The Avatar/Maximinani Julia Portas

[mrlafont]

L'individu vivant sous la domination de fer et d'acier du « progrès » moderne peut manger tout ce dont il a envie (en grande quantité) et se marier avec qui il veut — malheureusement ! — et aller partout où il veut (en théorie du moins). Mais il est obligé d'accepter, pour toutes les questions extra-individuelles — les questions qui, pour nous, importent réellement — les croyances, l'attitude devant la vie, l'échelle de valeurs et, à une grande échelle, les idées politiques qui tendent à renforcer le puissant système d'exploitation socio-économique auquel il appartient (auquel il est obligé d'appartenir, pour pouvoir vivre) et dans lequel il est un simple rouage. Et de plus, il est obligé de croire que c'est un privilège pour lui d'être un rouage dans un tel organisme; que les questions sans importance pour lesquelles il sent qu'il est son propre maître sont en fait les plus importantes — les seules réellement importantes. On lui enseigne à ne pas estimer cette liberté de jugement concernant la vérité ultime, esthétique, éthique, ou métaphysique, dont il est subtilement privé. Plus : on lui dit — dans les pays démocratiques en tous cas — qu'il est libre à tous égards, qu'il est « un individu qui ne doit rendre de compte à personne sauf à sa propre conscience »... après que des années de conditionnement habile aient modelé sa « conscience » et son être tout entier si parfaitement en accord avec le modèle, qu'il n'est plus capable de réagir différemment. Un tel homme peut bien parler de « pression sur l'individu » dans toutes les sociétés, anciennes ou modernes !

Savitri Devi, La Foudre et le Soleil.

[teutatesmars]