“I see nothing but a world of ruins, where a kind of front line is possible in the catacombs”
一 Julius Evola
seen from Canada

seen from China

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China

seen from Czechia

seen from Sweden
seen from Netherlands

seen from Sweden
seen from Yemen
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada
seen from Canada
seen from Netherlands
“I see nothing but a world of ruins, where a kind of front line is possible in the catacombs”
一 Julius Evola
Julius Evola Reading Guide
On topic of AI art: I use AI Art sometimes, but I have mixed feelings about it. Very mixed feelings about it.
One first thing: I think most AI critics make a huge mistake in thinking "AI bad, but technology good". In a way, AI is not just like every other technology but AI reveals the Essence of technology as such. I think every criticism of technology by heidegger, Marcuse, Ahmad fardid etc. Apply especially strong to AI. In a way, nick land was right: AI is the culmination of technology as such.
This will ofcourse be a very long topic and I cannot discuss everything in one article. If people are interested in it, I can do more texts.
I would like to start with Evolas criticism of technology. For evola, the main problem with technology is that better technology grants people access to powers they do not deserve to have and do not know how to handle in a responsible way. (Think this way: there are many superhero stories by marvel and dc, for example earth x, where suddenly everyone gets superpowers and society collapses due to many people abusing their powers. This is basically what evola meant.)
According to evola, the more time and effort it takes to learn a certain still and Power, the more this trains people to use it responsible. Best example here: it takes a lot of effort to properly learn Kung fu. But it's comparatively easy to learn how to use a Gun. And now, its almost unheard of that people use Kung fu to commit robberies and other Crimes. On the other hand, using guns to commit Crimes is very common.
One related aspect here is: if something takes a lot of effort, you think long before you decide to do it. You do not waste your time on crap. This weeds out bad stuff.
This problem is literally one of the Main explainations of AI slop: people do stupid things because its now easy to do. (And I must admit, one of the first things I did with AI was literally porn, just because I wanted to see if AI can be used for porn. Lol. Normally, I despise porn.)
But Here is a huge counterpoint: the knowledge that stuff will turn out as bad art did not deter people from doing it. Even before AI, the internet was literally a heap of slop.
15 years ago, the most common form of Art on the internet was literally that:
The internet was always a place of bad art where people did not spend effort on. In a way, AI even elevated the Quality of most internet art.
One other counterpoint is surrealism: the point of Surrealism was literally using art as a gateway into the freudian subconscious and to use your subconscious as a driving force of art. Literally art as destroying your own Barriers, your own shame etc. And experimenting with and revealing your Hidden desires, perversions, childishness, stupidity, ridiculousness, shamelessness etc. Art as a way to have limitless freedom without shame or social taboos.
And in that regards, AI allowing higg Quality art without too much conscious thought is actually a good thing. AI becomes the ultimate Surrealist Tool and vessel to your own unconscious.
And sometimes, you want to do art to check if an idea works. For example, I wrote an article where I suggested that we need to combine retrofuturist discsrded styles of Design ans architecture with traditionalism.
What is the right way to check that? Spend Months on Re learning bauhaus theory, googie architecture, feng shui etc. And carefully crafting a drawing just to end up with an idea which did not work in the first place? No. With AI you can check if an idea works and then, you can spend more time in doing something more elaborate and thought out.
Ebola and Evola Chan!!!
I found this personally hilarious to draw, sorry qwq
My site
Whatever is worth saving in the field of conduct needs to be liberated in an interior and simplified form, needing no consensus, and sound enough not to lean on any of the institutions or value systems of yesterday's world. As for the rest, it may as well collapse.
Julius Evola, Ride the Tiger
"Jewish people" is a fiction—religion ≠ ethnicity. The spiritual transcends tribal fetishism. #Evola #Tradition #Metapolitics
The truth is rather that at the heart of feminism lies a "radical pessimism": that is, the tacit premise that woman "as woman" cannot find value in herself, for which she must, as far as possible, transform herself into a man, claiming the same social and intellectual prerogatives as man. In this sense, we call it pessimism: the so-called feminist “claim” of women hides an abdication of modern women, their impotence, or their distrust, to be and have value as what they are. : as a woman, and not as a man. In short, this hides a degeneration, in the most rigorous sense of the term. To which, moreover, modern man is analogously brutalized into a purely physical and animal ideal - at best, a palely intellectual ideal - which represents his own decline in relation to the forms of life at the zenith, which devoted his " "effective virility", to which corresponded in our greatest traditions the two highest castes of the social hierarchy: that of the "Ascetics" and that of the "Warriors".
—Julius Evola