It's been a while since I had an unhinged comment... as always, happy to share.
Dear Reader,
If you clicked on a fic that very clearly stated was an explicitly sexual story involving a Master and a Slave they owned as property, I'd say you had to know what you signed up for.
You still decided you had to tell me that clearly the slave owner was "in the wrong" while the freedom fighters were "in the right", so how disappointed you are that I am vilifying the good guys despite that.
Oh my dearest reader, you are reading the story from the POV of the slave who is fucked up in the head and fell for the first owner who was nice to him. You don't need to tell me he was "misguided", the text is pretty fucking clear on that.
Then you read the POV of the master who cares more about the slave than they should yet unsure whether he should burn the world down and plunge them all into war just cause they can and he's being told it would be "the right thing". Again, slave owner, not exactly the hero of the narrative.
You really did not need me to point out even more explicitly that it's a fucked up relationship. Yet the "villified" characters do it all the same multiple times in a variety of ways, even when the POV characters do not want to hear it... or not ready to.
Also, I reckon you did not finish the story.
But hey, I'm not sure I trust you would understand the nuance in a bittersweet ending anyway.
No, I will not add an extra "Stockholm syndrome" tag, cause it's not what the relationship is. Also, Stockholm Syndrome doesn't exist.
I think the master/slave and non-con tags warned you about what you were getting yourself into well enough.
Oh, how could a slave ever think being enslaved is fine and they have everything they need? An idea to explore in fiction.
Recommended reading: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html










