#sessionshearing

[odinsblog]

[saenzsigns]

Stop breaking the law, asshole!

[dragoni]

Jeff “I Don’t Recall” Sessions

I don't recall I don't recall I don't recall

I don't know I don't recall I have no recollection I can't say

#SessionsHearing #OtherThingsSessionsCantRecall #RussiaCoverUp

[illusianation]

Jeff "I Can't Recall" Sessions #sessionshearing

[odinsblog]

I hope Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III gets struck by lightning, run over by a bus, and then struck by lightning again

[tyrras]

Ty flips off Dump every day for 4 years #resist #MAGA #bakedalaska #dividedstates #howtrump #trumprussia #altright #nomorenazis #littlemarco #jeffsessions #sessionshearing #nomoore #roymoorechildmolester #dougjonesforsenate #roymoorescreepylawyer #alabama #impeachtrump #trumptrain #proudamerican #guncontrolnow #gunviolence #guncontrolnow #gunculture #trumpisamoron #trumpisawhitesupremacist #banassaultweapons #bansemiautomaticweapons #wednesdaywisdom #somanyfuckingreasons

[darwindawkins]

I often talk about "willful ignorance." Meaning, you can debate the results and outcomes of a fact, but you cannot debate a fact. The greatest crime of this administration thus far, among many, is the misinformation being poured out for the purpose of confusing the willfully ignorant. Narrative control for those they know will never look more than skin deep into a issue. Is it the "deep state" keeping info from you? Or do you refuse to look any deeper into a issue once you believe you found what you needed to make your argument for or against an idea or a fact? An example I submit for your approval, is the idea of a "Justice Department." Should the Justice Department be fighting for liberty and justice for all? If that's not what they are fighting for are they still considered effective and competent enough to hold office? If they are targeting a specific group or culture with no evidence to show a crime has been committed are they not being derelict in their duty? Should they be allowed to continue when we come face to face with this specific dereliction? How many more examples do you need to come to a conclusion even if you disagree with the outcome? You are entitled to your own judgement, but you are not entitled to your own facts. "She began by noting that between 1956 and 1971 the FBI ran a counter intelligence program initiated by former director J. Edgar Hoover that involved abuses of power. She then noted a new Justice Department report into that warned “black identity extremists” were likely targeting law enforcement officers. “Who had the power in your department to order a report like this?” Bass asked. Sessions replied that he wasn’t sure how the report got ordered. “I don’t believe I approved it or directed it,” he said. He also admitted he is familiar with the idea of “black identity extremism.” “Can you tell me what it means to you?” Bass continued. “Do you believe there is a movement of African-Americans that identify themselves as black identity extremists and what does that movement do?” #JeffSessions #SessionsHearing #MSNBC #CNN #CSPAN #RealTime #BlackCaucus #PutinTrump2017 #Trumpland #Wapo #JustSayin #FoxNews #AlJazeera #MAGA #FBI #CIA (at Trumpland aka the Land of Make Believe)

[berlinbrent]

View this post on Instagram

From the red carpet in #Asia to the hot seat in #Washington. This is what awaits the #POTUS. For more watch #TheDay dw.com/theday @dwnews #SessionsHearing #trumpjr #russia (at Berlin, Germany)