i think romance and sex are constructs. unfortunately, i think that people would use this to deny that aspec people exist. radfem style
seen from Brazil

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from T1

seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Iraq
seen from Sweden
seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Poland
i think romance and sex are constructs. unfortunately, i think that people would use this to deny that aspec people exist. radfem style
My appointment: *starts at 1:30*
Me, at 1:35: where the fUCK-
The love of truth, is the way we get to the love within, and with one another.
Agreed.
When we pass along information we no longer control what people do with it and when folks make an unholy mess of it- it leaves the others implicated.
So it makes sense to stay hidden and only share sensitive information with those can grasp the meaning or the big picture.
If I know you are part of the network, then we are on one accord and I don't have to worry about my association with you.
Low key, this is how I prefer to operate within my own little circles 💯
Agreed.
When we pass along information we no longer control what people do with it and when folks make an unholy mess of it- it leaves the others implicated.
So it makes sense to stay hidden and only share sensitive information with those can grasp the meaning or the big picture.
If I know you are part of the network, then we are on one accord and I don't have to worry about my association with you.
Low key, this is how I prefer to operate within my own little circles 💯
List of fake bullshit that still has a profound (often negative) effect on real people's lives:
Money
Race
Gender
Hierarchy
listen things are only “bad” or “unacceptable” in society because previously we have deemed it to be so. honestly. do what you want, the paper mache laws that we’ve made is just a pinata ready for breaking
A growing and moving human population, as experienced in recent history, has expanding needs, wants, and desires. Such motivations have led to the creation of an amplifying artificial universe of things that is at odds with existing resources. The tension obstructs resource regeneration. How might we ignite futures that alleviate that tension? It seems that the artificial societal constructs established in past centuries, able to harmonise society at other historical crossroads, have not been able to keep up with the society of 2018. Could we ignite regenerative futures by redesigning these artificial societal constructs?
A metaphor to imagine the complexity of natural and artificial constructs in society could be a tree. Imagine the roots of a tree as representing the natural constructs of society, comprised of cultural dynamics and their intertwinement with nature. The trunk of the tree would represent the artificial constructs of society: organization, governance, and civic engagement. The interactions amongst societal organization, governance, and engagement would proliferate as branches, each with a different length. The forms of expressions we desire in society might spring out in the leaves of a tree. They could include our aims for freedom of speech, aspirations for literacy, anchoring our lives in values such as trust, or daily life enjoyments such as healthy eating.
The methods of understanding for how we might achieve those forms of expression would be ingrained within the stem of the tree. The imaginary stem would require the wisdom of sketching the unthinkable coupled with the making of artificial things, including intelligence. A vibrant tree both lives and regenerates. A vibrant society assures daily life in the context of a regenerative paradigm.
Facilitating diverse dialogues that ignite action through societal engagement seems to register some progress though. Although timid, the discussions could gain vigour when supported by societal constructs fitted for 2018 and beyond. Could today’s changemakers get inspired by earlier generations of visionaries who, at times when societal complexities were exacerbated, created innovative policies or treaties that broke down convoluted environments and drove society forward?