Sometimes, reading stuff about particle physics and quarks feels like reading about a magic system or smth. Anti-strange kaons? Charm? Up quark? Antimatter neutrino? Syncrotron? The God particle?? Abracadabra to you, too. Damn.
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Norway
seen from Macao SAR China

seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from Jamaica
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Russia
seen from Poland
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
Sometimes, reading stuff about particle physics and quarks feels like reading about a magic system or smth. Anti-strange kaons? Charm? Up quark? Antimatter neutrino? Syncrotron? The God particle?? Abracadabra to you, too. Damn.
hey min!! technically-speaking, i passed my particles class last year (physics undergrad) but i feel like i've forgotten just about everything (wtf is a CKM matrix again!?) :( as the resident particles guy (gender neutral) (tm), do you have any recs on recs on ressources/textbooks/particular funky overview/seminal papers i should read to remember? (we got from rutherford to roughly all the way up to QCD and higgs mechanism if that helps with the scope)
wtf is a CKM Matrix indeed...
i mainly relied on my lecture notes for particle physics ngl. i didnt even know we had a prescribed textbook until p late into the class oops. BUT, as the resident particle guy of course i have plenty of resources on particle physics.
I'm going to start with general undergrad level resources:
G.L. Kane, Modern Elementary Particle Physics: this was the nominal textbook for my undergrad particle physics class
D.J. Griffiths, Introduction to Elementary Particles: not the biggest fan of this one but it does the job for a lot of people so ill put it in
buttttt if you're interested in learning QFT, a lot more stuff becomes accessible. i would say the following textbooks are more suited for a standard model class than an intro to particle physics, but i can't tell the difference these days... getting too qftpilled i fear
QFT-Pilled Standard-Model-Maxxing:
T.P. Cheng and L.F. Li, Gauge Theories of Elementary Particle Physics: by the recommendation of a prof i have at my masters institution
D. Bailin and A. Love, Introduction to Gauge Theories: ive been introduced to these guys from their susy/string theory book but i think this one is p good too!
M. Schwartz, QFT & The Standard Model: i think this is such a great modern textbook for qft and the such. however, i am a traditionalist…
M. Peskin & D. Schroeder, Introduction to Quantum Field Theory: emotional support qft textbook
there are many online resources i rely on heavily for research and review. i cannot finish this post without giving them a shout out!
When you feel like clicking stuff and keep clicking stuff:
Particle Data Group: navigating the site is such a nightmare, but this is where the latest measurements of every particle physics ever. also includes great reviews for specific particle physics topics!
TASI Lectures: now these are more advanced topics, but a great resource if you have something specific you want to go into more detail
David Tong's Lecture Notes: how can i be a theoretical physics student without mentioning these!
CERN Document Server: there’s just so much to say about this so I’m just linking the whole thing so you can look around and see what’s useful (so many lectures, tutorials, papers)
i might have gone overboard with the resources! idk how technical we wanna get. so here's a peace offering:
And for the iPad kid, perhaps a video with their lunch?
PBS Spacetime, The Fundamental Forces & The Standard Model: comfort vids when i feel like throttling my subfield, but really well put together
Fermilab's Don Lincoln: can't finish a particle physics post without mentioning fermilab!
Veritasium, Your Mass is NOT from the Higgs Boson: oldie but goodie
im working on a separate post for the seminal papers in particle physics, so keep an eye out for that! sorry for not including that in this :// but i needed to split this up bc it was taking longer than expected to compile the papers (i keep thinking of new ones to add!)
of course, if there's a specific topic you're curious about, im happy to answer your questions to the best of my ability and point you in the direction of more resources!
apologies for taking so long to get to ur ask! finals have been going on forever :((( i just had my standard model final so writing this up was a great treat for me!
a little thing inspired by some of @oberorka 's and @acespace-spaceplace 's stuff. My little particulates
i actually don't know how to properly represent the neutral pion so if any physicist sees this Help me !
CERN Releases 300 Terabytes of Particle Collision Data [04.22.16]
TV show that personifies the four fundamental forces of the Standard Model as cute anime girls and allegorises the various difficulties that arise from the unified field hypothesis as forms of relationship drama.
Maisie's Galaxy
380 million years after the big bang, lies the furthest confirmed galaxy so far found amongst JWST data, now confirmed in it's age.
The galaxy of course defies many of the assumptions we had prior to JWST, and was not visible to Hubble, but now we find many examples that are redrawing our future model of how the universe was created.
The galaxy itself is named after a 10 year old little girl, the daughter of the Astronomer who picked it out. He found it on her 9th birthday, and just called it Maisie's galaxy between the researchers. The name made its way into the paper, and 10 year old Maisie joins only a handful of people who have galaxies named after them.
During the 1960s and 1970s, particle physicists made great strides in understanding the quantum structure of matter and the nongravitational forces that govern its behavior. The framework to which they were finally led by experimental results and theoretical insights is called the standard model of particle physics and is based on quantum mechanics, the matter particles in Table 12.1, and the force particles in Table 12.2 (ignoring the graviton, since the standard model does not incorporate gravity, and including the Higgs particle, which is not listed in the tables), all viewed as point particles.
The standard model failed to explain why the forces are transmitted by the precise list of particles in Table 12.2 and why the matter is composed of the precise list of particles in Table 12.1.
"The Fabric of the Cosmos" - Brian Greene
Standard Model - Tridgeon