#strawhatsufi

[fuego-acero-y-hierro-rebooted]

“ Yanker “ isn’t a slur u minority degenerate subhuman ape-pig the hard r is just a coincidence , now let’s discuss the BlackkkSS complaining too much. Now THAT’s what I call revolutionary Marxism !

[cyberpunkpavlichenko]

What a surprise this asshole wasn’t able to integrate into Latin American society and had to fuck off back to Albania?

I wish it would make them stop whining about an oppressed nationality in a country they aren’t from getting too much support and attention for the 2,000+ public lynchings of unarmed Black people by agents of the state every year. Support that was so widespread that every major city had an “anti-defund the police” backlash despite that never happening and then the number of yearly state lynchings jumped each year after that and police departments actually got more money and every Democrat was clamoring to give the police more funding. Wow such support, much love.

[kosmicpowers]

So like. Even if Sufi isn't an American scammer and they really are an Estonian expat, they're still fucked up for being racist as fuck and trying to literally game the governments of Latin America by faux claiming refugee status. If he's telling the truth that's genuinely worse

[thomasthetankieengine]

Strawhatsufi is proud to be against all settler countries .... unless of course it's Russia. 

Russia should be allowed to keep AND rebuild its colonial empire, because all Ukrainian nationalists (e.g. anyone Ukrainian who won't accept that they're really just Russians) are a bunch of Nazis and Zionists anyway. 

In other news, someone should tell this self-proclaimed "sensitive white boy" that Brazil and the rest of Latin America are also settler colonies and they are unambiguously European settler colonies at that.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2007.00224.x

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03058298231202554

https://www.jstor.org/stable/27733923

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13621025.2021.1984504

https://www.survivalinternational.org/news/12577

[cyberpunkpavlichenko]

@strawhatsufi I’m secular and I’m married to a Salvadoran woman in what was a non religious ceremony and none of that is relevant to your unrepentant racism against Black people that you should kill yourself over.

You can’t even help yourself here - what do I, a working class trade unionist, have to do with Epstein? Are we all the same to you?

Kill yourself.

Oh and you called me a Jewish child molester despite you being an apologist for Miss Pedophile Liberation. Israel is the pedophile colony, I’m just a diaspora Jew. Calling diaspora Jews pedophiles for no reason is a decades old Nazi talking point bruh

And another thing, me being Jewish absolutely gives me a right to complain about European racism especially Eastern European racism.

[cyberpunkpavlichenko]

Fucking insane that some American passport bro is using a faked ALBANIAN identity as the justification to call Black people subhumans and call me an Epstein child molester simply because I’m Jewish. Like that just adds such an extra dimension to everything they say.

You wanted an excuse to play the role of a victim and global southerner and you chose Albania as your false national identity? Girl how the fuck is being fucking Albanian an excuse to be antiblack, anti-indigenous and antisemitic?

[cyberpunkpavlichenko]

How have we built a social environment where a white seattleite from Alabama can falsely present herself as an Albanian in order to gain access to third worldist discourse that gives her an excuse to call Black people subhumans in conversations about Black Lives Matter getting too much undeserved attention compared to other struggles?

And this is a pattern with this woman, she did the same thing with TERFs a decade ago. She falsifies or obfuscates identities so she can spew reactionary discourse amongst a supportive community that allows her to grift for donations while having enough wealth to be an international traveler.

[cyberpunkpavlichenko]

What are your thoughts on landback in relation to Zionism? I see a lot of them claim Zionism is landback as a ‘gotcha’ to pro-landback liberals & leftists.

Of course my instinct is to call bullshit, because obviously landback does not entail mass murder ethnic cleansing and genocide, but I’m also not sure how I feel about the concept of Israel’s Jews having total sovereignty over that land given what they are currently doing to the people who they feel do not deserve that sovereignty.

It’s disingenuous because Native Americans and other indigenous peoples are not seeking to conquer an already settled land that they may have lived in thousands of years ago before migration patterns and diasporas dispersed them, seeking to replace their culture and sense of personhood and totally annihilate their physical existence so they can extract wealth on top of that land. Native Americans aren’t demanding that China and Russia become Turtle Islandia because their ancestors may have lived there many tens of thousands of years ago. That is the claim Israel is making and what they are doing to the pre-existing residents of Palestine. All of that was done TO Native Americans, so to invert the relationship between colonizer and colonized by comparing the colonized’s claims towards liberation to Zionism, is to be intellectually dishonest to such an extent that it implies active malice.

The colonizers of the Americas are not comparable to the Palestinian people in this dishonest landback criticism because it is the Palestinians who are being dispossessed and the American settlers who were the dispossessers in the American context. By comparing landback to Zionism what you’re essentially saying is that Americas settlers are victims of Native Americans who wish to genocide them, an outright Neo Nazi racist fantasy but somehow spoken in the language of “revolutionary politics.”

Zionism has co-opted the language of national liberation (seen Zionists explicitly use that phrase) and decolonization but that’s because national liberation and decolonization rhetoric has primarily been used in this context to support Palestinian claims to self determination and sovereignty over their lands and they want to confuse the debate or undercut their critics, it’s not a genuine embrace of Lenin, Stalin and Mao on the National Question.

If anything that proves the salience of decolonization theories, the enemy, the colonial empires, have to attack the criticism by pretending as if they already embody its traits. This is a common rhetorical tactic the ruling class uses when they are losing a situation. “Oh we’ve always been against slavery!” saving face mentality when forced into a corner.

Zionism cannot be “decolonization” because it itself is a colonial venture that seeks to replace the pre-existing residents and their culture so wealth can be extracted from the lands. And it confuses things - when the Kingdom of Judea fell the majority of the world’s Jews already lived outside of it because of prior expulsions and diasporas. So for the majority of the world’s Jews at that time, the loss of Judea mostly had religious significance and it did not impact their lives much outside of that. But was it the Arabs who conquered Judea and made it a vassal? No that was the Romans whose empire no longer exists.

For something to be decolonized, it must be first colonized. We see popular claims that Arabs colonized Judea but I’m not in the business of getting into land disputes from 700 AD like get a real job at that point that isn’t real and doesn’t matter, they certainly weren’t “colonizing” Jews who continued to live as citizens with better rights and less discrimination and violence than Jews who lived in Europe. There was no colonial relationship there, more the classic relationship of conquering kingdoms who want you to pay taxes to their specific king.