#syscourse?

[cccat-in-a-meat-sack]

By the way, I've seen a lot of discourse on "endogenic" alters, so repeat after me

Your brain splits alters as you need them. That means you can have a completely trauma based alter, and you can also have an alter created to deal with homework, aka an "endogenic" alter. If your system formed from trauma, you are not "traumaendo". You are traumagenic. Full stop.

[onika4discourse]

syscord isnt toxic unless ur an anti endo. MAYBE dont complain about how problematic they are if ur already in a problematic space...

the endogenic spaces wont ever force you to source seperate because their great grandmas 2nd cousin removed didnt like your source

they arent gonna force you to change your pk display name because your name is in relation to media their great x4 granduncles abuser didnt like

they dont host problematic spaces. if anything, pro endo spaces are HELPFUL

[soupsys-art]

I wouldn't say I'm anti tulpa but I'm not pro tulpa and I'm not neutral I have opinions on it.. From my research it seems like a programmed system if we did our correctly.. Now those who use tulpa as a culture appropriation are wrong and I do NOT support that

I also feel that the culture is wrong for traumatizing someone to a point of forming a whole ass disorder

[august-zip]

Throwing a post out,

DID and OSDD are not the presence of more altered state of identity. Its having less than one.

To further deepen this. We're all parts not our own whole selves, like a glass cup that has broken and shattered, all those pieces make up the whole even if its broken :P

If you shatter a plate, you don't have more than one plate. You have little pieces of one plate. Each piece = less than one plate.

[cosmicdisastersys]

Anti-endos are getting pathetic lol

I'm a admin in a very accepting pony town server. I know the owner very well and they are pro endogenic. Recently the server wasn't as active and I tried to chat w people online. There was a guy, let's call him shark ig. So I, shark and a third person were chatting and I said "I really wanna willo [insert character]". The text tone switch so fast. Shark said "You can't create alters?" And i responded "I can tho, I'm willogenic". Bro went silent and started bombing "You can't" "Endos aren't real" "only people with DID are systems" "you can't become a system" etc etc. I was like, laughing so hard over him trying to fight me about how I'm totally not real. I just told him he is breaking the rules, he said "but endos are still aren't real, you need trauma". I told the owner, we laughed about it and then banned the guy for breaking rules of discrimination. It was so goddamn funny dude.

[the-complicity-system]

You didn't make shit

YOU ARE PART OF THE SHIT

THE SYSTEM IS ALL THE FELLAS THE BRAIN PRINTED TO COPE MEANING YOU ARE PART OF THE SHIT

If anything "my brain made me" is so real

If you "made your system" you would be the "core" .... WHICH ISNT A THING (we dont really believe reclaiming the term is a good idea)

Sigh

It feels like when people say "Im therian! I chose- " *facepalms*

[moonbearblue]

Most of you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how the OSDD diagnosis works.

I am starting to get really frustrated with the OSDD arguments stemming from the CDD stuff. This post isn't about that but I feel like most of you are parroting stuff about OSDD from other people online with little understanding of how the OSDD diagnoses actually work.

1. OSDD 1a and OSDD 1b literally do not exist. That is outdated terminology like using DDNOS or MPD. It is fine as a community term but stop acting like it is a real diagnostic term. The only time 1a and 1b were used was back when it was considered DDNOS.

2. Technically the numbered diagnosis doesn't necessarily exist either. A clinician can choose to use a numbered diagnosis like OSDD1 if they want to, to be faster but they don't have to. Also the numbers can be useful for some. But technically they are meant to write the exact reason they are diagnosing OSDD instead of another dissociative disorder all the way out. Like someones records could say : OSDD, mixed dissociative symptomology, alternations of identity, no amnesia reported. (I am not sure if thats exactly how it would be worded as I am not a clinician, I am making this post after talking to my psychologist for a bit about this all.)

4. "Examples," The numbers are only examples of presentations or suggestions for the clinician to use when specifying what OSDD presentation someone has. Technically the clinician could specify a whole different reason or presentation than the ones that are on here.

Just wanted to get this out for now. I would recommend reading the yellow box because it explains what I was talking about. (This is an excerpt specifically from the DSM 5TR)

I am going to come back and add a bunch more stuff tomorrow but I need to go to bed now.

-Z

Here is me adding a little more actually about the CDD thing.

A lot of you have a kind of narrow view of the OSDD category because of using the numbers. OSDD is meant to be an "other" category for literally any number of presentations of dissociative disorders that do not fit into the other diagnoses. The argument of what OSDD diagnosis fit into a CDD and what doesn't is kind of silly because it will vary on a case to case basis. Not every case will fit perfectly into the examples given in the DSM and two people who fit into a single number presentation may vary wildly in symptomology.