Frankenstein (2025) dir. Guillermo del Toro + paintings




#interview with the vampire#iwtv#the vampire armand#assad zaman

seen from India

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Slovakia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Netherlands
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Slovakia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from United States
Frankenstein (2025) dir. Guillermo del Toro + paintings
i had to
The Creature calling itself Viktor and following Viktor around is so much more tragic when you know how babies develop and how newborns don't yet realise they and their mothers are two separate people. And one of the first things babies realise about themselves is that they're a whole separate person. And one of the first things they do when they start developing as a person is find out they have hands and play with them and with textures and start exploring. And when they want to start talking, they put their hands and fingers on their parents lips and throats to figure out how that sound is coming out of there and then they start imitating. Guillermo Del Toro nailed every single step of human development in such a beautiful celebration of life.
And Viktor abused the crap out of the poor creature for not being smart enough when it was only following natural developmental milestones. Because, like most men, like his own father, he wanted to create life but he wasn't interested in raising it beyond that and instead wanted it to be born a doctor ready to show the world how smart Viktor is for creating a carbon copy of his brain except in a stronger immortal body. Elizabeth gave him five minutes of love and let him explore how sounds come out of her mouth and he started talking.
Idk why some people are complaining about the movie being different from the book when the essence is literally the same, Viktor created life as if it were a godly feat and not something women have been doing since the dawn of humanity, and then he abandoned that life as deadbeat dads do. And that abandonment is what created a monster out of an innocent souls who could have become a beautiful being had it been nurtured. That's literally what Mary Shelley wrote. She would have been proud of this story. On top of being an incredibly gorgeous visual story, the narrative is very loyal to the point Shelley wanted to make.
"To be lost and to be found, that is the lifespan of love"
to simply exist
“To be lost and to be found, that is the life span of love.”
I’m just so in love with these two worms so much, look at them
Guillermo del Toro on the Creature