"The entire point of the (clone) war(s) was that the jedi should not have been participating"
No, no that's not it
The idea that the Jedi should have never been involved in the war is simplistic (and moralistic), it ignores several key realities
1. The Republic is under attack, the separatists are not merely trying to leave the Republic (because they are not a real secessionist movement), they are attacking itas they go, trying to conquer it, this is an existential threat to the Republic, and the Jedi are sworn to defend it
2. It's not just the Republic being threatened, it's repeatedly shown that the separatists don't respect neutrality and even worse, are slavers (the separatists are literally the confederate states of America IN SPACE, for fucks sake their official name is "Confederacy of Independent Systems", George Lucas was trying to make a very obvious allusion to a very specific evil), they want to conquer the galaxy and impose dictatorship, the Jedi cannot stand aside for that
3. All of the atrocities, the separatists have a staggering number of civilian bodies left in their wake, the Jedi definitely will not do nothing in the face of that
This is why the clone wars is such a perfect trap for the Jedi (the actual point of the war), it's just not something they can sit out, they would have participated and lead the charge even of they weren't specifically serving as Generals
4. Dooku, the separatist leader/dictator was one of the Jedi's own fallen to the dark side, not only is it their responsibility to bring their fallen brother to justice, but they may be the only ones who can (and that's before finding out Dooku isn't just a garden variety fallen Jedi/dark sider, but a sith lord)
5. Dooku and the separatists are out to kill the Jedi, all of them, the Jedi's own lives are in danger here, you can't stay out of a war when one side's stated goal is you being dead
"But what if Dooku wasn't fallen and the separatists weren't committing atrocities/attacking the Republic and neutrals/conquering the galaxy/taking slaves, just trying to leave the Republic"
Well the first problem there is that's not what the situation actually is, its an overly perfect what if scenario, second is that you're not describing the clone wars anymore, you're describing a wholly different war, political situation and background, and the third problem is that it's unrealistic
The entire reason the clone wars happened is the sith engineered it
The sith broke the Republic, causing a desire to leave it
The sith capitalized on those feelings, founding the separatists
The sith-aka the guys leading each side-made sure peaceful negotiations failed, leading to war
In order to have your no fallen Dooku, no atrocities, no attacking neutrals/the Republic, no conquering the galaxy, no slavery separatists scenario, you kinda need the sith to not be there, it's really the only way said scenario can happen
But if there's no sith, then peaceful negotiations are unlikely to fail, so war doesn't happen
No sith means the separatists won't be founded, not as what they are in SW canon (a tool) anyways, so the actual move to leave the Republic may not happen
But most importantly, no sith means the breaking of the Republic that created the want to leave it doesn't happen
You see the problem? In order for that perfect scenario to exist, the sith cannot be around, but the conditions to create that scenario (the want to leave the Republic, the Republic being broken and unable to fix itself, the failure of peaceful resolution) only exist because the sith made them, it's a paradox
















