Mutual Enemy
!!CHAPTER 5 SPOILERS!!
Based on this interaction people have noticed with the mannequin:

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from United States
seen from United States
Mutual Enemy
!!CHAPTER 5 SPOILERS!!
Based on this interaction people have noticed with the mannequin:
And now, a comic about experiencing trans joy through creation. Take it away, Mettaton!
Spread the love! Even a spammy long nosed doll deserves a chance to feel like himself.
Edit: I wrote an afterwards in the reblogs. There’s also a silly bonus drawing!
Transgener spamton and spamtenna because I have been suffering from a terrible period and I NEED to project
Something that has bothered me for a while now in the discussion surrounding Spamton's trans coding (or rather, the denial of it) is the idea that the dress mannequin can't represent anything negative because it would sully the meaning of The Dress itself as a symbol of freedom and self-acceptance. However, I think this argument fails to consider the idea that the dress and the dress mannequin are two different objects that represent two different things.
When talking about the meaning of the dress in this instance it's important to recognize that the dress can't be separated from the mannequin, both contextually and literally.
They are a package deal. The dress is permanently attached to the mannequin and must be analyzed with this context in mind. The dress being unobtainable on its own and instead being affixed to the mannequin makes this item inherently different from the dress in Undertale.
In Undertale, the dress is wearable. It's free to be given or taken with nothing to get in the way of that. In Deltarune, the mannequin flips this aspect of freedom on its head. The dress is unable to be taken off the mannequin or given to anyone else. The choice is taken away and the object is rendered useless.
The mannequin represents a lack of choice in the ill-fitting roles imposed upon oneself by others, and I think chapter 5 bolsters this idea even more with Pink's comment about how it "doesn't fit" just like how Spamton won't fit into the mannequin in chapter 2. Conversely, Ralsei likes the dress, but would be unable to wear it because it is instead being forced onto someone who doesn't want it.
Perhaps the dress freed from the mannequin would not evoke these same negative reactions, but as it is right now, the dress mannequin is the opposite of the dress in Undertale and shows how forcing people into roles that don't fit is a detriment to everyone. And, in my opinion, this is extremely fitting for a game like Deltarune, where the statement we are challenging throughout the game is not "In this world, it's kill or be killed," but instead "No one can choose who they are in this world."
Spamton Pre-T
before da story
Human slop of various qualities
Human Tenna's design changes every time i draw him don't mind that. Damn that rectangular creature
Bonus:
Pikachu says "Today is the Yesterday of Tomorrow"
it’s very important to me that these two are trans