#transgressive art

[victoriaangel101]

Weekend vibe: no pants, just panties

[sassytyphoonqueen]

Would you get a little horny if I was walking around the house like this? 😈

[aubreykatexxxxx]

[kateasthing]

A lil dress is a trans girl's best friend 💝

[unspeakablearchives]

What your opinion on how writer use topic like sa and other tabbo

My interpretation of what you're asking is: “What is your opinion on writers discussing topics like sexual assault and other taboo subjects?”

Well, it's obviously possible to depict taboo subjects without endorsing them... but that's kind of the cowardly answer lol.

So let's go deeper. What about works that actively defend or promote or revel in things like sexual assault, abuse, exploitation, etc?

I don't even want those to be banned. Here are just a few reasons why:

It is better to study darkness than to pretend it doesn't exist.

Suppressed material doesn't disappear - it just goes underground.

And bad ideas are easier to fight when they are visible to the public.

Censorship destroys evidence that scholars and investigators need.

Even monstrous writing can be useful as evidence, for instance if it documents crimes or other harm the author may have committed.

No authority can be trusted to "correctly" limit human imagination.

The people most eager to ban the worst material are rarely content to stop there. History shows that censorship always expands.

Few works are uniformly ugly. Even the most repulsive writings may contain moments of insight or reflection we can learn from.

Democracy is built on the idea that we must trust people, as a whole, to decide what's best for themselves, and to make their own personal decisions.

We can never predict how writings may affect strangers. If there is no single, specific individual target who is tangibly harmed, then we cannot say with any confidence that any work is innately "harmful."

Minority voices almost never control the censorship machine. This means works by minority groups end up policed much more harshly.

Rules regarding any censorship are necessarily vague and open to interpretation.

When people fear punishment for certain speech, they try to stay well within the law for their own safety. That leads people to self-censor perfectly legal speech just to be safe (a "chilling effect")

Access to more viewpoints - even shocking and vile ones ones - is a good thing. More information is good. Ignorance is NOT a virtue.

[jaileensworld]

Small enough for me to throw you around ??

🥵🍆🔥🫵

Hit me up on telegram if you think I can’t make you hard

Telegram link: https://t.me/lovelyjaileen

Telegram Username: @lovelyjaileen

Lovely Jaileen

You can contact @lovelyjaileen right away.

[ninaisherefr]

Natural 😍

[wake-snakes]