seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Moldova
seen from Singapore
seen from Brazil
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Singapore
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from Singapore
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from T1
I was scrolling through my screenshots deleting them and found a ss of a post that included mpreg fan art and way back then I was like oh! Cringe! And now I couldn’t give a less of a fuck. Anyway. The fan art was of destiel.
I have had destiel mpreg fan art on my phone for years. It was always meant to be for me to become a supernatural fan.
stupid cousin ocs !! orange one belongs to @urbanethos
dumb and dumber
more doodles under the cut
hate when people say aging up the crows in the anniversary editions was the correct decision and necessary. shut upppp u are wrong. for so many reasons.
i hate being autistic
Going to ramble about movies vs books as it pertains to what's shown and not and how this affects the publishing industry...a little.
Jurassic Park, the first one, is absolutely horrifying and tense and stressful. It does a fantastic job of relaying the horror of these prehistoric creatures and how poorly we would manage against them.
How foolish it is to mess with nature.
It's a delightfully unsettling monster movie that holds up better than anything its age. "Spared no expense" indeed.
However, there's no real blood or gore.
There should be. It should be dripping for how the dinosaurs rip people apart. Everyone should be coated head to toe in offal from how the T-Trex eats because it thrashes like a shark.
But there's nothing but a splattered window and some aftermath.
You might think, "well it is not a horror film, it is science fiction and adventure like the book."
Plenty of sci-fi is drenched in blood.
As is the book. It is horrendously bloody, and the author said it is to immerse the reader in the danger of these dinosaurs. He also said film doesn't need that. On film when you get bloody it is distracting.
It's fun to think about that.
There's a lot of writers who think in movies, who view their words as a lense and a camera seeing their world and following cues. Lot of readers do too.
So it's also important to think about.
To know when enough is enough and when to push it more. To know it takes more words to immerse someone in a scene than it does pictures.
You want to show someone how dangerous a beast is in a book you can write them eviscerating someone. The slow and agonizing details of flesh tearing, blood spurting, with a revolting stench of split bowels and everything leaking to soak the earth beneath.
In a movie you can talk about the evisceration but only show your beast violently consuming a cow with careful shots that never actually put the beast in perspective but clearly display its ravenous hunger.
It works. You know that thing is very dangerous and you do not want it near the characters.
More words, the right words, help create vivid images to get sucked into.
The need for less on screen, and so many conflating book and film, has me wondering if that's why submission guidelines have become ridiculously limited. Why more agents are looking for bloodless tales or being overly specific about the horror they'll take.
They're thinking in movies and can't see a need for the violence or gore so often prevalent in written fiction. Even in the genre of horror, where these things nest and breed.
It's too much to imagine and they'd rather watch the sanitized, bloodless film.
Trying to convince myself to finish one of my many in-progress games for Pillars 1 or Deadfire instead of creating another new character...
Hey, uh, quick question, cis women can be drag queens right? Im not crazy?? Cuz this girl in my friend group said that only men and trans women could be drag queens. She brought this up cuz i was yapping about mcr. For some reason she didnt realize i was talking about mcr for about 15 minutes. She asked me who gerard way was, i told her he's the lead singer of mcr, and she said she doesbt care about that band. Anywho, thats besides the point. Cis women can be drag queens right?? Right??
Dude I'm pretty sure half of jumblr are atheists. I've never seen any posts here even implying that only christians can be atheists. Who the heck is telling you that???
@legendarycatlover Man you know I started to write something nice and thoughtful out about this before I just decided I'm done arguing with people about this after like 6 hours. You are literally the 17th person to argue with me about this today. Most of the people who have sent me messages have in fact literally been insisting that 100% no ifs and or buts about it Atheists are all culturally Christian and 4 blocked me when I said nope not true there are Jews who will rip your head off if you even mention anything spiritual around them, diversity of culture is amazing. There has been a very clear and overt effort since around 2015 in liberal/leftist circles to frame full throttled atheism as something that purely exists as a trauma response to cultural Christianity. People decided serious 100% no spiritual beliefs at all Atheism is #cringe as a backlash to the 2011 reddit "checkmate religious people" jerks, and we have never recovered from it. This is not at all particular to Jumblr but Jumblr is certainly not exempt from it at all. If this is so baffling to you maybe just search the terms atheism and jumblr and try to find some posts about atheism that don't mention cultural Christianity? Or just block me like I suggested in an earlier post because I'm really getting sick of this.
