The advertisements have been inescapable throughout the entire city for months now: the serene greens and sharp geometrics of Edward Hopper slowly working into your subconscious down every Metro subway and dark alley. Even without the extensive press coverage, it would be impossible to avoid. On a nigh-on daily basis there would be someone talking about it within earshot, more likely than not about how they want to go to, but the tickets are completely sold out until November, December, January. The development this week was that the show had been extended for the weekend, constantly, until Monday evening.
So there we were, at two in the morning, joining the queue outside of the Grand Palais. We'd previously discussed our game plan: if the queue was long but moving, we'd join it. If the queue was short and unmoving, we'd join it. If the queue was long and not moving, we'd go elsewhere. Naturally, it was the latter, but we liked our odds and joined all the same. If we're not at that white plaque over there within half an hour, we ought to leave, we agreed. Indeed, we were at the white plaque within the time frame, so we waited.
And we waited.
And at one point, a Brazilian lady in front of us invited us, and the Parisian beside us, to join in with a game she had brought with her. For the following hour we got to know one another between rounds of playing Doubles (an elaborate version of Snap), when we'd have to breathe on our hands to regain circulation. After over two hours of standing out in the freezing cold with nothing but sunny dispositions warming us, the end was in sight. Throughout the morning, there’d been sporadic cries of glee upon entry to the gallery, or more accurately, exit from the queue. Ours was a chant of chau-ffage, chau-ffage as we climbed the stairs up to the entrance – sadly it didn’t catch on.
Once we’d seen to all the admin – buying a ticket, having a coffee – we were in. You’d have thought it was the opening night for the amount of people inside; as far as an art exhibition goes, it was packed to the rafters. A natural conveyer belt formed on the outer circle of each room, where people would walk as if roped together at a slow and steady pace, with just enough time to examine each work, read the plaque and form an opinion. The freer spirited of us drifted around the centre, wandering from canvas to canvas, peering in between shoulders to get a look.
The execution of the exhibit was phenomenal. Before seeing each phase of Hopper’s oeuvre, we were given a comprehensive guide to the artists from whom he drew his inspirations. The portraits of Robert Henri and the landscapes and live scenes of John Sloan, amongst others,guided us through Hopper’s work processes. The collection held by the Grand Palais surpassed expectations, even with all the hearsay. It contained a shrine of his complete works, everything from early political illustrations to watercolours, to his later, most celebrated oil paintings.
What stood out the most to me through the first half of the show, were the etchings. From afar, they impressed through the level of detail of shading and the intensity of contrast. From up close they held a very unique textural quality. Each stroke of the mark was raised as though it were a fresh, unhealed tattoo, with the same level of permanence and precision. As I continued to wander through, I also noticed more and more the detail to which Hopper would paint shadows. His eye for light is remarkable. The best example of this is Sun in an Empty Room (1963).The mere fact that Hopper had taken the time to paint an image of, exactly as the title would suggest, sun in an empty room is proof in itself that he was a great lover of light composition. Every aspect of the painting was both aesthetically and mathematically breathtaking, from the subtle angle at which the light was flooding in through the window, to the harsh divisions created by the wall, the window and the light itself, right up to the depth of colours in the darkest parts of the shadow and the lightest of the light.
Walking through the various gallery rooms, one saw not only the documentation of Hopper’s work, but of time. As the works developed, it was possible to see historically how each epoch had an effect on the artist. The colours changed, they became deeper and bolder, as well as the subject matters, which became increasingly modern, from countryscapes to gas stations. The most dramatic change of all though was of course the style. As time elapsed, Hopper became sharper and, as mentioned, more focused on the geometry of a painting. The compositions were photographic, with off-centred focal and vanishing points, yet possessed the ‘perfect thirds’ of classic painting.
On the way back down to the Metro, which by this time had re-opened, the line to get in was just as long as when we’d joined it, four or so hours beforehand. One of the most beautiful things about the Edward Hopper exhibition, it has to be said, was not the art. It was the dedication.