That_Silly_SCP

just a goofy bunch of anomalies ✌️ OSDD system :3

[proendo-adammrray]

I don't fw "endo neutral" mfs btw. You can't be neutral on someone's existence. How the fuck are you neutral on if someone exists or not. That's not how that works. You either think they exist or you don't it's really fucking simple.

[that-silly-scp]

endo neutral i think is more like they don't care/aren't bothered/don't have an opinion

[that-silly-scp]

psttt.....

anyone wanna be moots on art fight??? 👀

our username is ThatSillySCP :3

-Halo

[wulfmutt]

if you believe yourself to be plural without trauma, i don't care.

if you believe yourself to be plural without having a CDD, i don't care.

however, the terms "endogenic" and "willogenic" are fundamentally claiming to be a part of a group that they simply are not. there is no traumaless "version" of being a system. if you don't have a CDD, stop calling yourself a system. your parts are not "alters". these terms describe symptoms of a clinical condition. if you do not have said condition, you do not get to claim those terms for yourself.

make new terms to describe your experiences. a lot of endos seem to be a part of the MOGAI/LIOM community, which makes it baffling to me that some of them want to cling to the system label so badly.

i think there is a future where all forms of plurality can be accepted and we can all hold hands. it is not my (or anyone else's) place to dictate others' experiences. however, it is 100% my place as a pwDID to say that we cannot be using the same terms to describe our vastly different experiences. because no, being a non-traumagenic plural is nothing like having a CDD and it never will be.

edit; changed OSDDID to CDD to refer to all disordered, traumagenic plurality, as i believe anyone who falls under this label can call themself a system if they so choose

[sillyskinwalker]

reblog this to scare away r*dqueers and x*nosatanists

kids can not consent

animals can not consent

dead bodies can not consent

[that-silly-scp]

*sips tea* ahh. wonderful day to be here.

[that-silly-scp]

sup

yo, wassup? i'm dean, one of the alters that fronts the most here. i use he/him pronouns, and my job is to socialize with others because over half this system would have a heart attack approaching a human being-

anyways, i got a question for other systems: do y'all have that one alter who randomly spams memes via passive influence whenever someone's fronting?

...

well we do..

i am that alter 😈 *inser evil laugh*

anyways, have a nice day folks 😎

-Dean

[strangerconnection]

you know, i don't remember

[that-silly-scp]

Hello!!!

greeting, fellow anomalies, i'm Halo, the host of the Containment Failure System! i decided to start posting in here because i kind of wanted to reach out to some community, figured tumblr could be a good choice :D

so, we'll be mainly posting things like opinions/rants, questions, art and memes :p

we're an OSDD-1 (b) system, and i'll let the others introduce themselves later if they want (i don't wanna step on any boundaries or anything ahah)

so, i wanted to start this first post by setting my opinion on non traumagenic systems. so, our opinion is pretty complicated, and it changes from alter to alter, but the most shared opinion is the following:

i don't think 'system' is the right word for endogenic plurality — BUT i absolutely believe endogenic plurals exist. now, before you throw your tomatoes at me, let me explain:

so, for starters, if you consider yourself an endogenic system, i'm not here to fight you. you can interact if you want, i usually don't block but prefer to discuss like logical people. before you say anything, please read until the end.

in short terms, we don't believe all plurals are systems. and i have a very simple explanation.

plurality is an umbrella term. it comes in various forms and shapes. it can be caused by conditions such as BPD, bipolar disorder, PTSD/C-PTSD, neurodivergence and DID/OSDD/CDDs.

after all, as we know for dissociative disorders, we have 3 levels of dissociation, like shown in this chart:

see how there's also BPD and C/PTSD?

so, back on track, the term "system" is made for traumagenic plurals. and i have a good explanation for it too:

let's look at the term "system" for a moment. in CDDs, in which a person goes trough repeated unescapable trauma trough early childhood and past, and based on their brain's ability to dissociate, can split ego states in separate headmates.

the splitting is also, never random, and always serves a purpose, for the system's functioning: a part can hold trauma, a part can have the purpose of communicating, a part can hold the job of soothing during breakdowns.. you get what i mean.

however this specific structure isn't necessarily always present in all forms of plurality. also, for traumagenic systems, they often experience other symptoms such as dissociation, amnesia, distressing experiences with their system, and such.

now, if an 'endogenic' system presents those kind of symptoms and structure? it's likely you ARE traumagenic. now, it is very common that you don't remember your trauma, or don't realize an experience was traumatic.

but if you don't, then i personally wouldn't use the term system for that experience — but i'm not the label police. you do you. i don't want to say endos don't exist or that they are faking for attention, i am not that kind of person. i genuinely want to understand you guys.

if you have anything to say, you can comment, and we discuss like civil people. i am open to discussing this and seeing others opinions.

TL;DR:

i believe plural ≠ always DID/OSDD system = traumagenic (DID/OSDD specifically)

anyways, love yall! xoxo :3

-Halo and Victor