random shit I like

I DON'T DO CHAIN ASKS! Dm me for fursuit pics, always happy to dish those out. Icon made by @soft--dogs queer, they/them, 25, kind and loving person. I may be a furry but I'm not trash. If you actually read this description: Hi, how are you?

[thatgaydemigodnerd]

I did a graffiti workshop for school so I made this

DNI: terfs, truscum, trumeds

[thatgaydemigodnerd]

Bringing this back cause of recent events

[muzzlesbian]

shoving the tardis up my neopussy call that time dilation

[muzzlesbian]

-the doctor telling me that my surgery site is healing well at my 6-month checkup

[paranoidgemsbok]

Stardew valley is problematic because it forces you to have an outside cat in a threatened woodland environment

[ourflagmeansworms]

[guiltfactory]

your boyfriend isn't thematically significant

[cyphir-spacerobot]

Victor Frankenstein after achieving the impossible and building a fucking person from scraps of the dead: Oh god, ew, ew it's ugly! Yucky! Yucky! Gross! Ew! Ew! Yucky! Yucky! Gross! Ew!

[koiagain]

[pukicho]

I’d honestly be scared as fuck if a bunch of basic shapes came floating towards me. Yellow Prism. Red Sphere? Fuck that.

[javascript-official]

You are really gonna freak out when I tell you about the sun

[pukicho]

The Sun's fine as long as it stays over there

[veltroxx]

this made me smile, sending you warm vibes today

[pukicho]

… How warm?

[darkerthandarknesstyle93]

my light yagami quotebot on twitter very conveniently posted this a couple of hours after charlie kirk got domed and i havent stopped laughing since

[3000s]

while you were busy jacking off & cumming hard. it rained outside beautifully

[bunniope]

what do you think i was jacking off to...?

[drowsy-corpsegirl]

Love the asexual tranny too, btw

[clowngirlcreampie]

not every social interaction has to be rooted in sexuality and the second a lot of girls start denying their body to others they lose a lot of opportunities for connection and I think a lot of us pretend it just doesn't happen like that

[goslinggf]

um...exsqueak me ?

[goatstrogen]

you need to listen to your favourite album with your eyes closed NOW

[ttaibhse]

love this can’t believe it only has 1 like

[sonder-moon]

@fearforthestorm

[oneheadtoanother]

[2pen2wildfire]

parents are allowed to straight-up torture their kids with zero consequences. they can withhold food and water, lock you out of shelter, confiscate your belongings, bar you from human contact, attack and harm you and exert complete control over your physical appearance. and this is just the norm. if you speak out against it you're seen as a delinquent or a predator. even otherwise progressive people get uncomfortable with the idea of dismantling the nuclear family unit because they still see it as the best way to keep kids safe when that simply couldn't be further from the truth. it's evil.

[heyftinally]

This is also part of why I'm so loud about homeschool reform, specifically in the USA.

In the US, there is no meaningful legal definition for educational/academic neglect in any of the 50 states or federally. What this means is that a child can be "homeschooled" and exclusively be taught how to cook and clean, reach the age of 18 being unable to read, write, or count, and this alone is not considered neglect. That 18yo, should they even have the knowledge that suing exists, has no legal grounds to sue their parents for denying them an education.

In over 40 US states, a convicted child abuser can homeschool their children. So someone who has done time for child abuse and somehow regains access to their child(ren) can decide upon returning home that they want to "homeschool" their kids. Those children are now locked in a home with their abuser where nobody can see them.

There are no welfare checks.

There are no routine assessments.

There aren't even databases — state or federal — keeping track of how many homeschooled kids there actually are.

Meaning a child can be locked in their home for their entire life with their convicted abuser, learn absolutely nothing, never go to the doctor, and so long as that child is fed, clothed, and the abuse isn't physical or sexual, that child has almost no chance of rescue and no legal ground to seek restitution if/when they escape.

The only way homeschooled children get rescued is if they're beaten, starved, or physically neglected and they're able to get the right person to see that. Otherwise? They have to wait until someone finds out they were murdered as a result of their parents "homeschooling".

And feral homeschool parents love to jump down my throat about this, and then get even more pissed when I tell them I'm a homeschool alumni.

Because I know it's not all homeschoolers. But even one is too many, and the lack of protections should scare everyone. If you're a good homeschool parent, nothing will change. If not, you deserve whatever comes your way as a result of adequate oversight.

Children deserve rights.

[derinthescarletpescatarian]

It's not all homeschoolers... but it's certainly most of the homeschoolers who don't want protections and regulation. The ones who are homeschooling for the right reasons benefit from guidelines and benchmarks being in place.

[hometoursandotherstuff]

[daily-grian]

big ol void eyes