Misplaced Lens Cap
ellievsbear
No title available
No title available
ojovivo
NASA
pixel skylines
Kiana Khansmith
h
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Show & Tell
#extradirty
Discoholic 🪩
No title available
hello vonnie
roma★
No title available
sheepfilms
noise dept.
Keni
seen from Jordan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Australia
seen from Australia
seen from Morocco
@thatscarfedbrit
If we’re using this logic, the same thing can be said about any celebrity or successful public figure.
Hate Seth MacFarlane? Be honest with yourself, you hate fame. Hate Donald Trump? Be honest, you hate success. Hate Adolf Hitler? Be fucking honest with yourself! You hate hard working people!
Transgender people: 'Down with cis' is just a joke! Cis people are so fragile! Lol!
Transgender people: *Freaked the fuck out over The Danish Girl.*
Is it just me or do women seem more opposed to allowing women to go topless than men?
Just an anecdotal observation and I’m curious what everyone else thinks.
I think it kind of depends on the situation. I’ve heard a lot of people say stuff like ‘It’s not whether women should or shouldn’t be topless, it’s whether they consent to it!’, which I guess pretty much means if a girl wants to be topless, that’s a-ok, but if a man draws a topless woman/distributes the image, then it’s not.
But at the same time, it seems like a pretty shallow defense, as they also prattle on about ‘hyper sexualization’ and will often shame women who do go topless, or even accuse them of ‘internalize misogyny’, which kind of undermines their own argument. And on the other side of the coin, I’ve seen women sexualize male figureheads and celebrities way more than I’ve seen men do the same to female ones (I was raised in a house with two women, for the record).
But yeah, in short, there’s just no pleasing people.
White People: Pray4Paris
Black People: Pray For Kenya / Pray For The World
White People: Paris is the one hurting right now, not Kenya and not anywhere else!111!!!!
Black People: Black Lives Matter
White People: ALL LIVES MATTER, NOT JUST BLACK!
Do you guys get it now? Do you? Or are we still a little foggy on this?
You do realize you’re being a hypocrite yourselves when you say stuff like ‘pray for the world’ but condemn ‘all lives matter’, right?
You’re either in favour of supporting everyone or not. Unless you’re saying this stuff for the specific purpose of showing white people up. In which case, using the deaths of 100+ people for your own political agenda is kind of a shitty thing to do.
The thing about “pray for Paris” and “all lives matter” is that they’re petty retribution. So you have these people pointing out probles across the world, then come conservatives placing priority on France alone, often to justfy racism. Then you have people highlitghing racism, and come assholes that dishonestly try to prevent problem solving by whining that “everyone has it rough, such it”.
You are literally defending hypocritical childish tantrums.
Highlighting the fact that people close to home are dying at the hands of ISIS is a hypocritical childish tantrum? The people who go ‘Pray for the world’ aren’t whining that ‘everyone has it rough’? You assume everyone doing this is conservative? You believe using the deaths of 100+ people to further your political agenda is a respectful thing to do? You dislike it when people try to take away the impact of your voice, but see no problem doing it to others? You believe everyone has a set definition of what constitutes ‘racism’ and that everyone should just agree with you, whether or not the ‘racist’ behaviour in question is questionable, or even subjective? You don’t think people should be allowed to mourn, and if they do, they’re petty?
I come from a working class family in the south-east of England. For the first ten years of my life, we were living just above the poverty line
Exactly what benefits of slavery do I reap?
If feminists don’t care about the opinions of men, then why should men care about the opinions of feminists?
Today in art class me and some girls were talking about being followed. And all of us had a “the first time I got followed was…” story.
Midway through the conversation I realized how fucked up it is that we all had a story like that.
Not all men? Sure. But enough that all women are under threat.
this is my most popular post of all time so thanks for making me famous meninist assholes and thanks for spreading the message to those of you who took it seriously
First off, if you don’t like being called out, you really shouldn’t be posting on a public forum. And what makes you so sure that everyone that opposes you is a ‘meninist asshole’? Sounds like a generalization to me.
I live in an area where pretty much everyone has a story of being mugged/robbed/harassed by a Romanian person. Does this same principle apply to Romanians?
No one likes being called out but yeah it is a consequence of voicing your opinion, I admit that.
What makes me so sure? The fact that I’ve been consistently called “feminazi”, “paranoid”, “retard”, etc. for expressing my beliefs.
Does this same principle apply to Romanians? No. Firstly because women being harassed by men is a documented phenomena and an issue worldwide. Secondly because the reason that the people near you have had bad experiences with Romanian people is likely because in your area Romanians are typically less economically privileged and live in poorer conditions where criminal activity is common. (Correct me if I’m wrong.)
The point is, there’s a pretty good comparison to be drawn in both cases. Are Romanians naturally prone to violence because of the way they were born? No. Are men? No. Can an entire group be held responsible for the actions of some of them? No.
But it’s important to recognize that society teaches certain groups of people that certain behavior which is not okay is okay. So it’s up to members of that group (in this case, men) and those outside of it to be accountable for destroying the mindset that teaches men it’s okay to harass women and protecting women from being victims of harassment.
I don’t see how that’s relevant to them allegedly being meninists. If anything, it makes you a hypocrite as you do not like being amused of things you’re not, and then go ahead and accuse others of being things they might not be. Either way, I’ve been called ‘racist’, ‘sexist’, ‘fragile man’, etc. myself for expressing my own beliefs. People just get hostile when faced with conflicting opinions.
And whilst I could agree that women have it pretty bad in third world countries, I find it hard to believe the same could be said about the first world. Sure, they may face some shit either directly or indirectly because of their sex, but so do men. Everyone has there problems. To be honest, I don’t know what the living conditions are for Romanians around here are, but I’m ready to accept they may have it worse. But on the topic, boys (particularly, white boys) are actually doing worse in school than any other group (x). Sure, this report is based in Britain, so I don’t know what it’s like in the rest of the world; but the Romanian situation we were referring to takes place in Britain as well.
Whilst I agree that there are people out there teaching stuff like misogyny, and that they should be stopped, I find the idea that society as a whole condones this to be quite a ludicrous accusation. There are areas where women have it worse, sure, but there are also areas where men have it worse. Everyone has there struggles. Claiming that one group has it great whilst another doesn’t isn’t going to help anyone, and, if anything, will just further divide people.
White People: Pray4Paris
Black People: Pray For Kenya / Pray For The World
White People: Paris is the one hurting right now, not Kenya and not anywhere else!111!!!!
Black People: Black Lives Matter
White People: ALL LIVES MATTER, NOT JUST BLACK!
Do you guys get it now? Do you? Or are we still a little foggy on this?
You do realize you’re being a hypocrite yourselves when you say stuff like ‘pray for the world’ but condemn ‘all lives matter’, right?
You’re either in favour of supporting everyone or not. Unless you’re saying this stuff for the specific purpose of showing white people up. In which case, using the deaths of 100+ people for your own political agenda is kind of a shitty thing to do.
You ever wonder why SJW types claim everything to be sexist and/or racist?
Because many of them have never faced true ‘oppression’, so they lower the bar of what constitutes being oppressed so that the ideals they spew seem somehow more valid.
Today in art class me and some girls were talking about being followed. And all of us had a “the first time I got followed was…” story.
Midway through the conversation I realized how fucked up it is that we all had a story like that.
Not all men? Sure. But enough that all women are under threat.
this is my most popular post of all time so thanks for making me famous meninist assholes and thanks for spreading the message to those of you who took it seriously
First off, if you don’t like being called out, you really shouldn’t be posting on a public forum. And what makes you so sure that everyone that opposes you is a ‘meninist asshole’? Sounds like a generalization to me.
I live in an area where pretty much everyone has a story of being mugged/robbed/harassed by a Romanian person. Does this same principle apply to Romanians?
“Feminism simply means you believe in equality of the sexes! If you’re against feminism, you don’t believe that men and women should be equal!”
So, does that mean that, if you oppose MRA’s, you’re against the idea that men deserve rights?
First off, ‘appears’ is a weasel word, and you have provided no citations.
Secondly, assuming this is true, it’s pretty unfair to hold all men to these standards. After all, black people are five times more likely to commit a violent crime than white people (x), but I imagine you’d say it was racist to judge all black people just because of this (which I agree with, but I digress).
Now, you could argue that this is because of social and economic factors outside of of race. Well, consider this; boys (specifically, white boys) are reportedly doing worse in schools than any other group (x). Now, this is simply a report based in Britain, so I can’t say if the same goes for countries like America, though they are pretty similar culturally. Feel free to correct me if I;m wrong, though.
No man on the internet can ever scare me. Not really. It’s all just bullshit macho bravado. They try and try, but it’s all very sad and desperate, and ultimately it means nothing. Nothing. Masculinity is nothing but a performance. And all I can do is shrug and not care.
Hey, I took those forensic psychology classes.Men are only scary until the point you can stop and figure them out. And then once you do? The mystery evaporates.
A man prone to violence is honestly about as interesting as a dog turd.
What do you want, a medal? Not being scared of people on the internet is hardly an achievement.
Guys just need to start thinking more with the right head
The girl in question is discussing politics and political ideology, though. The ability to discuss politics doesn’t necessarily mean someone is smart, though, and I’m sure you’re well aware of that fact.
Besides, even if she was ‘smart’, the boy still has the right to disagree with the girl, much like the girl has the right to disagree with the boy. if there political views contrast too much, then naturally, they aren’t going to be drawn to one another. This isn’t a one way street.
Either way, it sounds like the person who wrote this is just upset a boy she liked didn’t want to get with her.
I can’t even with this racist bullshit
Firstly, these are two completely different scenarios in two different environments with different people involved.
Secondly, the girl was arrested and will presumably be convicted; she’s not privileged just because one online paper called her adorable. And the story with the black kids is quite clearly painting the alleged racism against them in a negative light; if the racism was being condoned, they probably wouldn’t feel the need to write the article in the first place.
real talk though
anti sjws like to talk about how sjws get easily defended and shit like that
but anti sjws are the easiest people to offend on this website by far
you literally just need to make a joke about people preparing bland, flavorless food with no spices or seasoning and it’s like you just threatened to unleash a biochemical WMD to kill all white people
it’s almost comical
They get offended because they’re tired of the hypocrisy SJW’s spew. When criticizing anything black people is deemed racist, or even making jokes about them is racist, it’s kind of a slap in the face when they then say shit like ‘Kill all white men’ or ‘Masculinity is so fragile!’ and stuff like that.
SJW’s get offended when they see something they don’t like, anti-SJW’s get offended when SJW’s force these same things on other people.
If I make a post about men needing to be better emotional support systems for women, I don’t want to hear you whine about how women don’t do this or do that. This post ain’t about them, it’s about you. YOU do better. I don’t wanna hear about what women aren’t doing, because we’re talking about what YOU aren’t doing.
So, you only care that the ‘right’ side is receiving support?
