RMH
untitled
$LAYYYTER
h
bliss lane
#extradirty
ojovivo
No title available
occasionally subtle
art blog(derogatory)
izzy's playlists!
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”
Sade Olutola
Game Changer & Make Some Noise
No title available
đȘŒ
PR's Tumblrdome
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
official daine visual archive
Noah Kahan
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Germany
seen from France
seen from Italy
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
@the-library-alcove
New policy: No more arguing with Christianists, especially the ones who think that missionizing is a good thing. Autoblock on sight.
EDIT: Addendum: Antisemitic atheists too.
Less a DNI, and more just an exasperated sigh at this point, yes, I vet new followers for my own safety and I will automatically block missionaries, Christian apologists, antisemitic atheists, antizionists, Nazis (WTAF are you following me in the first place?), and TERFs.
So the US miltary got the BIGGEST budget in TRILLIONS of dollars yet look at this?
The Navy is starving and exhausted. So uh...WHERE IS THAT MONEY GOING?!
the disability community is so unsafe for Jews itâs insane. what do you mean I canât talk to other chronically ill people because theyâre all wrapping themselves in keffiyehs and posting from the river to the sea and saying we donât have healthcare because of the zios and Israel. what do you mean
.
Do Left Wing Populists Really Believe In Anything, Or Is It Just Social Contagion?
it really is quite bad for your military to have an image of itself as a warrior class. what you really want is for your soldiers to think of themselves as boring professionals who will fill out a report form if someone gets a little too warrior ethos out there
The lesson of Vietnam for the US military was that if you try to play-act being a warrior class, all those kids forced to play along even though they didn't want to leads to extensive fragging and outright refusal to respond to orders.
The reason the US has never had a draft since Vietnam is because it was a war we never should have been in and the death rate was absolutely horrifying and never led to long-term wins, and the drafted soldiers were pissed they were there, were pissed they were ordered to put their lives on the line for literally nothing (North Vietnam had no interest in coming for the US*), and were pissed by either being white and integrated with black troops or being black and having to deal with racist fucking assholes.
The military did a study of fragging in Vietnam and came to the conclusion that the best way to keep a military that actually follows military discipline in 99.99% of cases** is to make it wholly voluntary***. People who CHOOSE to go into the military will treat it as the career it is, not the rage-inducing draft they never wanted.
(Source: Fragging: Why U.S. Soldiers Assaulted Their Officers in Vietnam By George Lepre)
*North Korea also did not have plans to move on the US, but the WW2 veterans who made up the draft had seen what the Nazis did, then saw Russia show its true colors and then had instant Cold War paranoia after WW2, so that was an easy sell. Plus all the little brothers who couldn't go to war for WW2 were ready to be heroes like their brothers.
**To see what happens when you use 'noble warrior class' horseshit to get a bunch of people to sign up for the military, look up what happened to Pat Tillman.
***Feel like this should be unending asterisks because of all the ways the modern military lies and cajoles people into joining. It should NEVER be "jail or military service" at the absolute least. But also, "We'll pay you (in five years), and we'll pay for your college (after four to six years of service)" is additional bullshit.)
Douglas Murray wrote a book that delves deeply into the âdeath cultâ that is Israelâs adversary. Its snubbing speaks volumes about the leftâ
#this was a good read#spoiler alert: it goes on to explain where it thinks the book itself goes astray#but the fundamental point is that there should still be engagement#which I think is correct - we canât even have the CONVERSATION and thatâs deeply troubling
excerpts:
A terrible mutation afflicts American politics. What began as fury over Israelâs conduct of the Gaza war has evolved, in significant parts of the progressive left, into a pathological hostility toward Israel that has become a driver of political identity and debate. The genocide accusation is increasingly treated not as a contested claim but as settled truth; opposition to Zionism as evidence of virtue; and even Hamas and âarmed resistanceâ can be romanticized or excused.
[...]
 Israel is being cast as such a singular evil that opposing it can seem almost a prerequisite for occupying the moral high ground.
[...]
Douglas Murray has never lacked critics. That is the inevitable consequence of writing about immigration, identity politics and the Westâs growing loss of confidence in itself. His earlier books, The Strange Death of Europe and The War on the West, provoked fierce disagreement, but they were treated as books that demanded engagement â reviewed, debated and rebutted.
On Democracies and Death Cults, published last year, received something different.
I believe the reason is plain. This was the first Murray book whose principal purpose was not simply to criticize fashionable ideas in the West but to defend Israel during the most contentious conflict of our time.
Had he written 250 pages arguing that Israelâs campaign in Gaza was criminal, reviews would almost certainly have followed. Instead, he argued that Hamas is a death cult, that Israel is confronting an enemy unlike any conventional military adversary, and that much of the Western left has become morally incapable of distinguishing between a liberal democracy from an organization that celebrates the murder of civilians, including on its own side.
[...]
The most remarkable thing about this book is that it exists at all. Its central proposition ought to be among the least controversial statements in modern politics: Hamas is evil. The fact that an accomplished writer felt compelled to devote an entire book to persuading educated Western readers of that proposition â and that this is controversial â says volumes about what our society has mutated into.
Murrayâs achievement is not merely to condemn Hamas but to explain it. He rejects the comforting fiction that it is simply another national liberation movement employing regrettable tactics. Barbarism, he argues, is not incidental to Hamas. It is intrinsic to its worldview.
Hamas does not merely accept death as the price of war. It glorifies death, sanctifies martyrdom and exploits the deaths of its own people as readily as those of its enemies. Its objective is not a negotiated peace or a two-state solution. It has repeatedly opposed such outcomes because it does not seek coexistence with Israel but Israelâs destruction. Unless one regards Israelâs very existence as an occupation to be liberated, Hamasâs own stated aims are impossible to misunderstand.
[...]
The distinction is visible not merely in military conduct but in culture. When General Gadi Eisenkot, now running for prime minister, lost his son fighting in Gaza, Israel mourned with him. When Ismail Haniyehâs sons were killed, Haniyeh publicly celebrated their martyrdom. One response grieved the loss of life. The other glorified it. That is not merely a political distinction. It is a civilizational one.
[...]
Yet the most unsettling chapters are not really about Hamas or Hezbollah.
They are about us. Murray argues that large parts of the contemporary Western left have become incapable of recognizing jihadist movements for what they are because they increasingly interpret every conflict through a single moral framework: oppressor and oppressed. Once Israelis are cast as oppressors and Palestinians as oppressed, every other moral consideration recedes. Terrorism becomes âresistance,â massacres become contextual, and universal moral standards give way to political tribalism.
That, he argues, explains not only why so much of the world glosses over Hamasâs obvious evil, but why so many people seemed incapable of extending even the most basic sympathy to the victims of Oct. 7. Why were posters of kidnapped children, elderly civilians and Holocaust survivors torn down on Western campuses? Why was the instinct not to mourn, but to explain away, relativize or even celebrate?
He also asks why the outrage is so selective.
Do those denouncing Israel know that while more than half a million Arabs were displaced during the 1948-49 war, an even greater number of Jews were driven from or compelled to flee Arab countries, most of them finding refuge in Israel as citizens? Do they know that Palestinian refugee status â in neighboring Arab countries culturally and ethnically practically indistinguishable from the Palestinians! â has been uniquely preserved and inherited across generations, while other refugee crises have generally been resolved through resettlement and integration?
Do they know how many Muslims are dying today in Sudan and elsewhere in Africa with scarcely a fraction of the attention devoted to Israel? Do they know that, at roughly the same time as the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, the Partition of India uprooted many millions of people â Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs â in one of historyâs largest and bloodiest population exchanges?
Why does none of this provoke anything resembling the same moral fervor?
Israel is a tiny country, scarcely larger than New Jersey even including the Negev Desert, and closer in populated area to Rhode Island. It is fighting organizations openly committed to its destruction. Yet it has become the singular obsession of the activist left.
Is this extraordinary fixation simply the product of ignorance? Do many of those chanting Hamas slogans know little of the history they claim to invoke? Or is something darker at work? Is Israel judged by standards applied to no other nation because it is the worldâs only Jewish state? Is it actually antisemitism??
One need not answer that question categorically to recognize that it cannot simply be dismissed. The sheer selectivity of the outrage demands an explanation. Pretending it does not is no answer at all. And yet the worldâs media has ignored the main and probably only book written by an outsider that tries to set the record straight, despite his status as a celebrity public intellectual.
[...]
Many of us now occupy an uncomfortable place. We believe Hamas is evil and that Israel has every right to defend itself against organizations committed to its destruction. We believe Western civilization, for all its undeniable failures, deserves defending because it produced constitutional government, scientific inquiry, individual liberty and the very tradition of self-criticism that allows us to acknowledge its mistakes.
At the same time, we believe in climate science, vaccination, expertise, the rule of law, sensible gun regulation and a robust social safety net. We reject identity politics that reduces history to oppression, but we reject populism that dismisses knowledge, institutions and liberal norms just as firmly.
And we know Netanyahu is a vile and venal schemer who cannot be trusted. We also know the West Bank occupation is not sustainable and plain wrong â even if the Palestinians twice rejected fair offers for a partition and a state.
Twenty years ago, those views would have described a fairly conventional liberal. Today they seem to describe almost no political constituency at all.
You do not have to agree with everything Murray says or believes or does to understand that On Democracies and Death Cults deserves engagement.
The lack of engagement with On Democracies and Death Cults is almost more revealing than the book itself. Murrayâs central claim, that Hamas is a murderous, nihilistic organization whose ideology glorifies death, and which helps the Palestinians not at all, ought not to require elaborate demonstration. It should be self-evident to anyone with any information and minimal intelligence.
Yet much of the mainstream intellectual and media establishment simply chose not to grapple with the argument. That silence reflects a profound unseriousness. Institutions that pride themselves on intellectual openness inadvertently reinforced Murrayâs broader thesis: that important parts of the Western intellectual establishment have become unable â or unwilling â to make moral distinctions that once lay at the heart of liberal civilization.
[...]
I am not prepared to believe that this battle for liberalism has already been lost. Perhaps liberals can beat back the progressive challenge. But it is a battle that must be fought. If the political right continues its descent into populist illiberalism while important parts of the left continue to abandon the moral clarity that once defined liberal democracy, then we are in very deep trouble indeed.
---
Real talk: I hate that there are so few writers who fall into this niche:
non-Jewish
politically progressive (or, at least, not right-wing)
able to unequivocally condemn Hamas and October 7 and able to say that Israel's basic and fundamental reason for fighting in Gaza, even if not necessarily its conduct, was undeniably reasonable.
I do not want to be in the same circles as Douglas Murray, a man who has declared that " 'Gender affirming surgery' puts a feel-good phrase on child butchery" and that "there is no such thing as 'non-binary'", which is evidently "a recent invention by people who want to identify as 'Look at me.'", wondered why asexual people might dress in revealing clothing, misgendered a nonbinary person, et cetera.
But the fact is that I do not think that Douglas Murray wants me dead for being nonbinary. I think that if Douglas Murray got his wish, things would be bad. But I do not think that Douglas Murray wishes trans and nonbinary people dead.
I cannot say the same of Hamasniks and Jews ("Zionists"). As such, I will very reluctantly be in the same circles as Douglas Murray.
Considering how much goyim complain about what they see as outsized focus on Holocaust education, so many goyim know absolutely jackshit about the Holocaust
Because the Holocaust was meant to be some sort of self-improvement lesson about man's inhumanity to man or something universal like that, not specifically about us pesky, whiny Jews.
Is the UN antisemitic for insisting that refugees should be allowed to right of return?
No, they are antisemitic for decades of ignoring attacks on Israeli civilians , being extremely biased and literally supporting terrorists . And i think you know that⊠do a google search or I donât know, listen to Jews.
Anyways, Here are a few reasons:
-calling out Israel more than any other country, while there are countries in their board that are actual dictatorships with apartheid & genocide .
Theyâre fixated on Israel.
-only holding Israel for agreements made while ignoring the fact that other parties have been violating the terms (aka harming Israeli civilians, amassing an army& weapons , moving past certain borders, etc).
*Aka whatâs happening with Hezbollah& Hamas over the last 20 years ,,,
-ignoring the events of October 7th for almost a year: kidnapping of civilians, mass murder and torture , women being raped as a weapon of war , etc.
The UN has a long history of being antisemitic and anti- Israel.
â
Instead of actually helping Palestinian refugees, the UN donated money and resources to literal terrorists. It perpetuates the narrative that they are refugees instead of actually resolving the issue.
Hell they let a terrorist organisation control the Gaza Strip for years. Said terrorists are higher ups in UNWRAâŠ
Some reading:
...
It is taken as fact by the overwhelming number of global Jewish organizations that the United Nations suffers from an antisemitic rot - Clic
Also for having a different definition of "refugee" for Palestinians. Like, by consistent definitions, either a tiny minority of Palestinians are still refugees and the rest are (second class) citizens of where they were born elsewhere across the MENA region... or the majority of Israelis are equally still refugees awaiting return of citizenship and homes. The problem is the double standard.
There's also the fact that they don't insist on a "right of return" for any other group of refugees.
For every other refugee population, the priority is finding them a stable place to live, not sending them back to the place they fled from or were driven out of.
Having a separate standard for Palestinians is both blatantly designed to harm Israel and extremely cruel to the Palestinian refugees, some of whom have been trapped in limbo for the better part of a century instead of having the option to have actual lives anywhere.
Furthermore, even if we ignore the fact that no other refugee population has a "right of return" the UN doesn't even recognize the Palestinian refugees who have or can return as non refugees
(Palestinian refugees claim to be refugees from, well, Palestine, but Palestinians living under the Palestinian authority are still refugees despite claiming to be living in Palestine, the place they were supposedly refugees from and wanted to return to. Even more decisively, Palestinians living in east Jerusalem when it was annexed were granted residency permits in Israel, if they wanted to they could go anywhere in Israel, including their old homes, these people are still however viewed as refugees.) by marking these individuals as refugees the UN effectively says that Israel has to be destroyed first before any return is valid.
And the UN puts ZERO pressure on the countries that deny Palestinians citizenship. There are the descendants of Palestinians who left in the 40s and 50s, living in Egypt and Jordan, who are not citizens of any country. They're living in the same country their parents were born in and they're still not citizens.
And instead of trying to get these people citizenship and the right to vote and engage with their governments, the UN instead says that they're refugees and should eventually be returned.
No one is trying to deport all Rwandan Americans back to Rwanda, or Bosnian Americans back to Bosnia. We understand that people left for a reason and yes, it would be great if people could return, but they need the legal protection of asylum and citizenship NOW.
I call my dog "Better Business Bureau" because it started as calling her Baby, then Baby Bee, which devolved into BeeBeeBee, thus BBB, which as we all know helps consumers and businesses in the United States and Canada and is a very good girl
Or CFPB bevause she's neutered?
How does it feel to disrupt a household. This is sticking
TUMBLR ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED!
"He said on the podcast with Alistair Campbell and Rory Stewart that while Mr Farage was likely to win ânumericallyâ, he would not win âmorallyâ.
âIf he strikes me down, I will become more powerful than he can possibly imagine. Imagine that all he can say is that he defeated a bin.""
I would dearly love to see the good Count win, and hope that Clacton voters will turn out for him.
But yeah, the beauty of this is that even if he loses, Farage still loses. He, who aspires to lead (or rather, let's be honest, rob and ruin) the UK, had to run a serious race against a gag candidate wearing a bin.
nyishaloraine:
A few housekeeping notes before the comments arrive:
No need to announce your departure. This isnât an airport. âđŸ
An insult in place of an argument is an ad hominem. Look that up while youâre looking up actual history.
Being gullible isnât a flex.
Ghislaine Maxwellâs father acquired a textbook publisher in 1988. Holocaust evidence was presented at Nuremberg more than 40 years earlier. Chronology matters.
Israel is criticized every day. Stop saying itâs not allowed đđ€ŠđŸââïž
Research requires testing your belief against contradictory evidence. Automatically declaring every document, witness, historian, and institution part of the conspiracy creates a closed loop where your belief can never be disproven. Thatâs called intellectual insulation.
And please retire âEnjoy your $7K, goy.â Itâs played out. I wish someone would pay me $7K to share basic common sense.
Jewish people are human beings. Turning them into a shadowy explanation for everything you dislike is ancient scapegoating repackaged as independent thought. We can do better.
I said what I said. #thinkclearly
posts like this always receive hundreds of comments with an outpouring of love from grateful Jews (as they should!), and then, like clockwork:
(sorry that somehow these didnât come out uniform in size!)
whatâs really remarkable is her combatting it. most donât do that, which is entirely understandable. Jews on social media arenât even expending the energy to respond to hate like this anymore (also understandable, I donât either, you really canât reason with people like this), it is exhausting, but it still means a lot to see someone be brave and try. đ€
like im not pro-censorship but i think if the internet archive is going to host holocaust denial and antisemitic propaganda they should at least put a warning with resources on it
I need yâall to realize that itâs on there because of their anti censorship policies, not because theyâre unable to to monitor. It comes up at the top of the page when you search âJewsâ. You donât have to look hard for it.
This was literally the 8th result:
this was the 13th result:
you only have to scroll to page 3 to get this:
this justin chatter guy has uploaded tons of unabashed holocaust denial and neonazi propaganda.
i should not have to say this but this is obviously dangerous and hateful content that could lead to radicalization.
Compare this to rateyourmusic, a website I have been using regularly for years. They are also very anti-censorship and include Nazi material on the site as it is meant to be an encyclopedia of all the music of all time. However, they put warnings on any page that contains Nazi material with a disclaimer that the site does not support that content and that itâs simply there for their mission of cataloging music. RYM also is made up of user input. If a user uploads something that isnât tagged properly as containing Nazi material, their upload will be rejected. Other users vote on whether a submission is adequate.
Here's what RYM puts as a warning on their site:
I like the internet archive. I use it regularly. Itâs an incredible resource and a fantastic organization. I just wish they would do more to keep Jewish people safe.
Gotta love how the gay rights, womenâs rights, anti racism, anti classism, labour rights, islamophobia of this entire website go to hell when countries like China are concerned.
Is communism really all that important to you that you can ignore all the horrors these people are doing?
Is it that your propaganda of âcommunism good capitalism badâ really needs to be the only one heard, so the condition of workers in Shein and other companies is hindering you as you protest why communism gives labours rights?
Is your idea of every communist nation being utter utopia so fragile that the reality of horrors in that country really need to be muted?
I donât know man, it feels to me that you guys are âputting your worldviews over peopleâs livesâ.
That sound familiar?
The âleftâ in the USA has been breathtakingly hypocritical about the plight of Uighurs in particular, but you can see this elsewhere too (cough Ukraine cough), for years at this point. Itâs giving âbut the Soviets had good schools and womenâs rights!â Tell me you are a braindead zealot without telling me you are a braindead zealot.
People need to start thinking critically for a change, and they also need to take a step back from their ideologiesâwhatever those may beâand start thinking in terms of actual principles, like human rights and justice and fairness.ïżŒ
The Leftâs callousness when it comes to the Uyghur genocide still shocks me. There were 12 million Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang. Their only âcrimeâ was existing as a racial and religious minority group. We donât know how many have been murdered because China is trying to hide any evidence of wrongdoing and so the information we do have is limited and often outdated, and probably does not show the full extent of the horrors going on.
But even what is confirmed is awful. Theyâve put people in camps. Itâs the largest mass in internment of its type since the holocaust. They are subjected to systemic rape, not as random acts of violence (which would be bad enough) but as a planned policy. They are also subjected to Forced sterilizations, mass surveillance, and slavery. Where are the protests? Where are the boycotts? Where is the outrage? Where is the basic human decency that should make anyone care about the suffering of these people - men, women, and children?!
Actual liberals and progressives who value human rights would care about this. But the far left is neither liberal nor progressive. They are a pro-authoritarian hate movement fueled by Russian and Chinese propaganda. Thatâs why theyâre against Ukraine and donât care about the genocide in Xinjiang, and why they constantly prop up MAGA and undermine Democrats.
The thing is a lot of internet communism isnât about how to utilize the philosophy of Marx or whatever, itâs an edge lordâs attempt at filling a how void. Many of these people are ex-alt righters, and instead of deconstructing, they just kinda replaced the old radicalization with the new one.
And the new radicalization is not that different. Far left and far right or both fascism with only very tiny differences. Thereâs a reason the Soviet Union and the Nazi Third Reich were natural allies and worked well together to invade and divide up Eastern Europe while committing horrific war crimes and wouldâve continued to work together if Hitler hadnât betrayed Stalin.
#from what i've seen most self-described internet leftists#are just social conservatives that aren't christian-enough to hang with maga#they still want misogyny and racism and authoritarianism -- they just want it to be based on marx instead of the bible via @sick-sad-little-world
I'm still of the opinion that Identity Politics massively fucked over the Left, because you had a whole bunch of people whose intrinsic personal outlook was socially conservative get shoved into progressive spaces because they happened to be queer or other minority... and then, once there, started to redecorate the place to be more to their liking.
See, the more I research on this, the more I'm certain that political affiliation/perspective follows a bell curve in the human population, and cultural and environmental factors are what make the bell curve skew right or left in a given electorate/population at a given time.
But it's still a bell curve, meaning that any sub-population will still means you have people who are essentially biologically predisposed to a conservative or a progressive outlook and can only be shifted so far by that skew from where their own attitudes naturally fall.
And this isn't biological determinism or a "conservative/progressive gene" or any of that shit--this is how, across populations, people who tend to experience a stronger fear response or disgust response are more likely to identify with authoritarian or conservative ideologies... and it's so easily messed with that you can get people to shift more conservative on a questionaire by having a prominent reminder to wash their dirty hands in the testing room!
But the Identity Politics/"Queers/Minorities are Innately Progressive!" outlook meant that a massive number of socially conservative and socially authoritarian queer folks and minorities have been pushed into a progressive space that they are innately uncomfortable with, and have, as a result, been working to reduce their discomfort.
Biology isn't destiny, but it sure puts a thumb on the scale, and a massive chunk of propaganda methods are trying to figure out how to make the scales as lopsided as possible, by appealing to people's senses of fear and/or disgust in order to artificially inflame them.
IMO the issues aren't with THEORIES or concepts like the Crenshaw definition of Intersectionality in an academic setting. The issue is with treating it like some kind of gospel or D&D Character sheet to map privilege, because it gets incredibly weird and bigoted real fucking fast. (IIRC the most popular "Privilege Checker" sheet on here ADDED to your 'privilege points' if you were Jewish, and was treated as gospel and a performance of virtue and guilt) When anything becomes a faith/fandom/cult, especially all three, people will be marginalized and hurt and killed and a bunch of ostensibly empathic progressives will be cheering it along if they're the 'wrong sorts' just like their conservative or radical parents.
oh god are you thinking about this?
welp someone tell ace people they don't face anything. someone tell bi people and trans people who are "passable" that things are great. apparently being a bi american jew makes you equivalent to a billionaire. everyone gets social autism. that's a freebie. i genuinely can't. i think i dug into this once but like. it's so fucking awful.
That's it, that's the one. Honestly would not be surprised if it was some kind of 4Chan op or satire.
On the one hand, while I've run into "progressive" people who use the R slur, it's not as common and they tend to shy from doing it where just anyone could see.
On the other hand, thinking that anyone from the Middle East is automatically The Disprivilegedest is very much a "progressive" thing. So, I don't know.
Messianic or some kind of weird philosemite; block and move on.
It's pretty obvious that Israel's "pro LGBT" thing is just propaganda to make them look modern and progressive (not like the evil, backwards Arab countries, you see?), but they can't help but be hypocritical in everything they do because gay marriage isn't even legal in Israel. This is pink money at its worse, most vicious form - queer people being used as leverage to help justify a genocide
This may sound wild to you, but not everything is a calculated nefarious evil plot.
Israel is relatively queer friendly, because it is relatively queer friendly. The reason there is no gay marriage is because of a larger issue with how marriage law works in Israel.
Couples married abroad, including gay couples, have equal rights to couples married within Israel. Gay couples are eligible to adopt children.
Is Israel perfect about queer rights? No. But no country is. Every country has their bigots and their naysayers about various groups, including queer people.
Just look at how quick you are to call anything positive related to Israel a deliberate viscious propaganda, rather than normal every day people living their normal every day lives.
I guess Jon Strewart can still get offended âas a Jewâ about one thing. Nope, itâs not the skyrocketing hate crimes in NYC, where he lived
I donât like Fetterman either, this isnât about him - Jon explicitly says in this clip that heâs doesnât consider Israeli Jews part of or âthe same thingâ as the Jewish community. half the worldâs Jews live there, Jon. if theyâre not a part of us, then what even are we?
suddenly his utter lack of concern about 10/7 nor the hostages makes much more sense.
fucking sick of how when i like or reblog something criticising the IDFâs ongoing genocide then tumblr starts showing me the most outrageous antisemitic content âbecause of your likesâ.
like no being against the indiscriminate murder of hundreds of thousands of people in gaza and the expropriation of land in the name of a terrorist ethnostate doesnt mean i think âracemixingâ is a thing or an abomination or that âthe jewsâ are coordinating some kind of population replacement in the US empire actually.
See, when you use dogwhistles, the dogs hear it and start barking. You're agreeing with Nazis--down to using "ethnostate", coined by Richard Spencer--so they find you as a fellow traveler.
But I know better than to try to make you realize that, so I'm mostly just reblogging this so other Jews can block your Nazi-sympathizing ass.
